On Jul 8, 4:46*am, "Scout"
wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...

On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote:
usual delusional racist blather

Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate to be
fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by very
definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT.

Case closed.

That's an interesting position.

And a correct and dispositive one.

I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was entering
improper data into the birth certificate records database, then illegal
aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate" which the clerk
would check the records, find the data entered, and happily issue a
certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except in the
computer on fraudulent data.

Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record
filed in 1961.

So tell me, NJ issued those birth certificates, where they True and Correct?

No because unlike Obama's they did not reflect the original record.

Why is it Hawaii can't seem to find the original?

Umm, who said it couldn't find it? It did and released it. Case is
closed, fuzznuts.

Why is it there is a serious question about the registration number that
shows up on the document Obama has produced?

There is no such question.

Seems to me given the irregularities that further investigation is warranted
if only due to his security clearances.

Seems to me you're full of **** as usual. Your denial does not create
a real doubt about the document, but about your sanity,

Certainly such would occur with
anyone else obtaining or holding a TS clearance should such irregularities
arise.

No, it would do no such thing. The state certification would be
accepted.

So why is he "special"?

He is "special" in the historical sense that he made history by being
the first and only presidential candidate in US history ever to
actually document through his birth certificate that he meets the
natural born citizen requirement. Case closed.

"Iarnrod" wrote in message
...
On Jul 8, 4:46 am, "Scout"
wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...

On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote:
usual delusional racist blather

Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate to be
fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by very
definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT.

Case closed.

That's an interesting position.

And a correct and dispositive one.

I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was entering
improper data into the birth certificate records database, then illegal
aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate" which the
clerk
would check the records, find the data entered, and happily issue a
certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except in the
computer on fraudulent data.

Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record
filed in 1961.

Cite.

So tell me, NJ issued those birth certificates, where they True and
Correct?

No because unlike Obama's they did not reflect the original record.

Yep, no one has validated Obama's, indeed there are reports they can't even
find it. So how you do validate a copy when you can't find the original?


Why is it Hawaii can't seem to find the original?

Umm, who said it couldn't find it? It did and released it. Case is
closed, fuzznuts.

Then you will have no problems producing a cite of it.

On Jul 8, 7:18*pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...



On Jul 8, 4:46 am, "Scout"
wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

....

On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote:
usual delusional racist blather

Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate to be
fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by very
definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT.

Case closed.

That's an interesting position.

And a correct and dispositive one.

I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was entering
improper data into the birth certificate records database, then illegal
aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate" which the
clerk
would check the records, find the data entered, and happily issue a
certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except in the
computer on fraudulent data.

Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record
filed in 1961.

Cite.

Hey stoopid, check the White House web site. Obama gave it out at a
press conference. It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you
sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid.

So tell me, NJ issued those birth certificates, where they True and
Correct?

No because unlike Obama's they did not reflect the original record.

Yep, no one has validated Obama's,

Hawaii has.

indeed there are reports they can't even
find it.

No, there are in fact so such reports, stoopid. You're just lying.
Making **** up doesn't constitute what we smart people like to call
"evidence," dope.

So how you do validate a copy when you can't find the original?

False premise. DISMISSED. The original in fact is now public,

Why is it Hawaii can't seem to find the original?

Umm, who said it couldn't find it? It did and released it. Case is
closed, fuzznuts.

Then you will have no problems producing a cite of it.

Hey stoopid, check the White House web site. Obama gave it out at a
press conference. It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you
sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid.

On Jul 10, 7:15*am, Iarnrod wrote:

Hey stoopid, check the White House web site. Obama gave it out at a
press conference. It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you
sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid.

You know how it is with racists like him.
Anything claimed by his fellow racist nutters is seized upon as fact
by him and propagated in spite of it being wrong and proven so.

"Iarnrod" wrote in message
...
On Jul 8, 7:18 pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...



On Jul 8, 4:46 am, "Scout"
wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...

On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote:
usual delusional racist blather

Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate to be
fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by very
definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT.

Case closed.

That's an interesting position.

And a correct and dispositive one.

I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was
entering
improper data into the birth certificate records database, then
illegal
aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate" which the
clerk
would check the records, find the data entered, and happily issue a
certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except in
the
computer on fraudulent data.

Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record
filed in 1961.

Cite.

Hey stoopid, check the White House web site.

Really? The White House web site is controlled by the Hawaiian government?

Obama gave it out at a
press conference.

Oh, so now Obama is Hawaii?

It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you
sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid.

I accept you can't back up your BS, and since they haven't released it there
is no verification for what Obama has produced which has some questionable
issues concerning it.

On 7/10/2011 12:04 AM, george wrote:

Well Donald Trump changed his claim about the birth certificate
declaring that his questioning made Obama get his birth certificate
released to the media.
And guess what, Obama was born a US citizen....

Speaking of Trump (the Republican's answer to Bozo the Clown)*, whatever
happened to the 'bombshell' Trump was going to drop about the startling
information his hired detectives "discovered"? Sort of interesting as to
how that conveniently died on the vine.


* At least Bozo is honest about admitting he is a clown, more than you
can say about Trump.

On 7/9/2011 11:45 PM, Scout wrote:

Actually there are a number of things, like:

1) Why does his registration number come after someone who's birth was
registered several days after Obama's?
2) Why does his scan have a white halo around the lettering rather than
showing the security document features as it should?
3) Why are the pixel sizes irregular, and why do some of those pixels
not line up with the other pixels?


There, 3 questionable things about his BC, and ones which I bet you
don't have a valid answer for.

None of the other birthtard kookers here have been able to answer this,
so let me give you a shot at providing a valid answer...

Why hasn't the R-E-P-U-B-L-I-C-A-N, C-O-N-S-E-R-V-A-T-I-V-E, anti-Obama
Wall Street Journal, with its fleet of investigative reporters and deep
pockets not found anything like you mention above, hmmm?

Why does the Wall Street Journal say Obama *IS* a legitimate US citizen???

Maybe you could make a few bucks selling your phony "facts" above to the
WSJ. On second thought, they probably aren't as gullible as the birthtards.

On Jul 9, 9:45*pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...



On Jul 9, 4:10 pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

....

On Jul 8, 7:18 pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...

On Jul 8, 4:46 am, "Scout"

wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...

On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote:
usual delusional racist blather

Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate to
be
fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by very
definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT.

Case closed.

That's an interesting position.

And a correct and dispositive one.

I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was
entering
improper data into the birth certificate records database, then
illegal
aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate" which
the
clerk
would check the records, find the data entered, and happily issue a
certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except in
the
computer on fraudulent data.

Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record
filed in 1961.

Cite.

Hey stoopid, check the White House web site.

Really? The White House web site is controlled by the Hawaiian
government?

Hey stoopid, didn't you CHECK it out? snicker

Widdle Cub Scout is afwaid. He's bit off more than he can chew here
and is running away!

Obama gave it out at a
press conference.

Oh, so now Obama is Hawaii?

BWAHAAAHAHAAHAHAAA!!! Keep tap dancing, kook!! LUV IT!!!

It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you
sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid.

I accept you can't back up your BS, and since they haven't released it
there
is no verification for what Obama has produced which has some
questionable
issues concerning it.

There is not one single questionable thing about Obama's birth
certificate.

Actually there are a number of things, like:

1) Why does his registration number come after someone who's birth was
registered several days after Obama's?

Cite.

Not questionable. It's Hawaii's system, the state have authenticated
it. Case is closed.

2) Why does his scan have a white halo around the lettering rather than
showing the security document features as it should?

False premise. Lack of cite to support your claims is duly noted.
There is nothing about the scan that is questionable to anyone who
knows anything about pdf files.

3) Why are the pixel sizes irregular, and why do some of those pixels not
line up with the other pixels?

Lack of cite noted. Lack of cite that anything of the sort would be
questionable is also noted. Your stupidity is noted.

There, 3 questionable things about his BC, and ones which I bet you don't
have a valid answer for.

You have not yet raised a valid and supportable question. DISMISSED.

Hint: Bone up on pdfs, kooker.

"Iarnrod" wrote in message
...
On Jul 9, 9:45 pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...



On Jul 9, 4:10 pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...

On Jul 8, 7:18 pm, "Scout"

wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...

On Jul 8, 4:46 am, "Scout"

wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...

On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote:
usual delusional racist blather

Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate
to
be
fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by
very
definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT.

Case closed.

That's an interesting position.

And a correct and dispositive one.

I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was
entering
improper data into the birth certificate records database, then
illegal
aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate"
which
the
clerk
would check the records, find the data entered, and happily
issue a
certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except
in
the
computer on fraudulent data.

Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record
filed in 1961.

Cite.

Hey stoopid, check the White House web site.

Really? The White House web site is controlled by the Hawaiian
government?

Hey stoopid, didn't you CHECK it out? snicker

Widdle Cub Scout is afwaid. He's bit off more than he can chew here
and is running away!

Obama gave it out at a
press conference.

Oh, so now Obama is Hawaii?

BWAHAAAHAHAAHAHAAA!!! Keep tap dancing, kook!! LUV IT!!!

It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you
sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid.

I accept you can't back up your BS, and since they haven't released it
there
is no verification for what Obama has produced which has some
questionable
issues concerning it.

There is not one single questionable thing about Obama's birth
certificate.

Actually there are a number of things, like:

1) Why does his registration number come after someone who's birth was
registered several days after Obama's?

Cite.

http://www.sodahead.com/united-state...estion-525043/

Not questionable. It's Hawaii's system, the state have authenticated
it. Case is closed.

Which does not address the issues, or proves anything since independent
verification can not be obtained.


2) Why does his scan have a white halo around the lettering rather than
showing the security document features as it should?

False premise. Lack of cite to support your claims is duly noted.

http://www.decodedscience.com/presid...anomalies/1784

There is nothing about the scan that is questionable to anyone who
knows anything about pdf files.

So it is your contention that in a scan of a document the PDF software would
put a white halo around the lettering and remove the security document
features?

Cite.


3) Why are the pixel sizes irregular, and why do some of those pixels not
line up with the other pixels?

Lack of cite noted. Lack of cite that anything of the sort would be
questionable is also noted. Your stupidity is noted.

http://www.decodedscience.com/presid...anomalies/1784

There, 3 questionable things about his BC, and ones which I bet you don't
have a valid answer for.

You have not yet raised a valid and supportable question. DISMISSED.

Hint: Bone up on pdfs, kooker.

Cites provided, and I await your counter cites showing that pdf files act in
this manner.

On Jul 10, 9:41*am, "Scout"
wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...



On Jul 9, 9:45 pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

....

On Jul 9, 4:10 pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...

On Jul 8, 7:18 pm, "Scout"

wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...

On Jul 8, 4:46 am, "Scout"

wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...

On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote:
usual delusional racist blather

Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate
to
be
fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by
very
definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT.

Case closed.

That's an interesting position.

And a correct and dispositive one.

I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was
entering
improper data into the birth certificate records database, then
illegal
aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate"
which
the
clerk
would check the records, find the data entered, and happily
issue a
certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except
in
the
computer on fraudulent data.

Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record
filed in 1961.

Cite.

Hey stoopid, check the White House web site.

Really? The White House web site is controlled by the Hawaiian
government?

Hey stoopid, didn't you CHECK it out? snicker

Widdle Cub Scout is afwaid. He's bit off more than he can chew here
and is running away!

Obama gave it out at a
press conference.

Oh, so now Obama is Hawaii?

BWAHAAAHAHAAHAHAAA!!! Keep tap dancing, kook!! LUV IT!!!

It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you
sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid.

I accept you can't back up your BS, and since they haven't released it
there
is no verification for what Obama has produced which has some
questionable
issues concerning it.

There is not one single questionable thing about Obama's birth
certificate.

Actually there are a number of things, like:

1) Why does his registration number come after someone who's birth was
registered several days after Obama's?

Cite.

http://www.sodahead.com/united-state...crepancy-in-ob...

Not questionable. It's Hawaii's system, the state have authenticated
it. Case is closed.

Which does not address the issues, or proves anything since independent
verification can not be obtained.

What is the issue? You have yet to establish that there is an issue
here. Your mystification over Hawaii's numbering system does not
create a crisis for actual people with actual brains, kook.

2) Why does his scan have a white halo around the lettering rather than
showing the security document features as it should?

False premise. Lack of cite to support your claims is duly noted.

http://www.decodedscience.com/presid...rtificate-pixe...

DISMISSED. Failure to state a claim. Your claim is not established.

There is nothing about the scan that is questionable to anyone who
knows anything about pdf files.

So it is your contention that in a scan of a document the PDF software would
put a white halo around the lettering and remove the security document
features?

Cite.

Cite what? YOU are the one who needs to cite, You cannot.


3) Why are the pixel sizes irregular, and why do some of those pixels not
line up with the other pixels?

Lack of cite noted. Lack of cite that anything of the sort would be
questionable is also noted. Your stupidity is noted.

http://www.decodedscience.com/presid...rtificate-pixe...

DISMISSED. Ignorance of simple PDF methods doesn't create an actual
issue for people with actual brains.

There, 3 questionable things about his BC, and ones which I bet you don't
have a valid answer for.

You have not yet raised a valid and supportable question. DISMISSED.

Hint: Bone up on pdfs, kooker.

Cites provided,

All irrelevant to your stated claims. You have yet to show that any of
this is unusual.

and I await your counter cites showing that pdf files act in
this manner.

I await your cites to support your ludicrous brainless and ignorant
claims.

Hint: We both know you will fail since the birth certificate is of
course the real McCoy as Hawaii has certified. Case is closed, moran.