On Jul 9, 9:45*pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...



On Jul 9, 4:10 pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

....

On Jul 8, 7:18 pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...

On Jul 8, 4:46 am, "Scout"

wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...

On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote:
usual delusional racist blather

Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate to
be
fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by very
definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT.

Case closed.

That's an interesting position.

And a correct and dispositive one.

I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was
entering
improper data into the birth certificate records database, then
illegal
aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate" which
the
clerk
would check the records, find the data entered, and happily issue a
certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except in
the
computer on fraudulent data.

Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record
filed in 1961.

Cite.

Hey stoopid, check the White House web site.

Really? The White House web site is controlled by the Hawaiian
government?

Hey stoopid, didn't you CHECK it out? snicker

Widdle Cub Scout is afwaid. He's bit off more than he can chew here
and is running away!

Obama gave it out at a
press conference.

Oh, so now Obama is Hawaii?

BWAHAAAHAHAAHAHAAA!!! Keep tap dancing, kook!! LUV IT!!!

It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you
sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid.

I accept you can't back up your BS, and since they haven't released it
there
is no verification for what Obama has produced which has some
questionable
issues concerning it.

There is not one single questionable thing about Obama's birth
certificate.

Actually there are a number of things, like:

1) Why does his registration number come after someone who's birth was
registered several days after Obama's?

Cite.

Not questionable. It's Hawaii's system, the state have authenticated
it. Case is closed.

2) Why does his scan have a white halo around the lettering rather than
showing the security document features as it should?

False premise. Lack of cite to support your claims is duly noted.
There is nothing about the scan that is questionable to anyone who
knows anything about pdf files.

3) Why are the pixel sizes irregular, and why do some of those pixels not
line up with the other pixels?

Lack of cite noted. Lack of cite that anything of the sort would be
questionable is also noted. Your stupidity is noted.

There, 3 questionable things about his BC, and ones which I bet you don't
have a valid answer for.

You have not yet raised a valid and supportable question. DISMISSED.

Hint: Bone up on pdfs, kooker.