Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
DING DONG THE CFL BULB WITCH IS DEAD
On 12/18/2011 6:26 PM, Ernie wrote:
You guys really bought it hook, line and sinker. Well, maybe so... ....but you DID dodge the question. Please try again to tell us which of the easily provable true statements below you believe is incorrect. 1) They use one quarter the energy of incandescent bulbs, thus reducing YOUR lighting bill to one quarter of what it was. 2) At the generating station end, CFL usage causes the power plants to emit one quarter of the mercury into the atmosphere compared to incandescent usage. 3) The CFLs use less electricity compared to incandescent, thus significantly reducing our dependence on foreign oil (if most lighting was switched over to CFLs). |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
shamma lamma ding-dong | Policy | |||
shamma lamma ding-dong | Antenna | |||
shamma lamma ding-dong | Policy | |||
Ding Dong the Ugly Old Witch... | Shortwave | |||
"DING! DONG! The Loon is DEAD!" | Shortwave |