Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because of the cost of satellites, and the fact that they must be overhead,
they will not take the place of shortwave for a long time. Satellite receivers, even though they are very small, are costly. But, here in north america you can try XM or Sirrius. They have lots of channels. Not exactly the variety of shortwave radio though. "S R" wrote in message ... I was wondering because of all of the trouble picking up signals with the natural environment were in, could it be possible that satellites shortwave satellites solved this problem? While still being a wireless radio signal? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC refuses to censor satellite radio | Broadcasting | |||
Satellite radio's new gadgets? | Broadcasting | |||
US satellite radio - defection to satellite radio may elevate medium | Broadcasting | |||
US satellite radio pins hopes on women, cars | Broadcasting | |||
Sirius satellite gets NFL football | Shortwave |