LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12   Report Post  
Old March 20th 04, 03:59 PM
John Jenkins
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Because of the cost of satellites, and the fact that they must be overhead,
they will not take the place of shortwave for a long time. Satellite receivers,
even though they are very small, are costly. But, here in north america you
can try XM or Sirrius. They have lots of channels. Not exactly the variety
of shortwave radio though.

"S R" wrote in message ...
I was wondering because of all of the trouble picking up signals with the
natural environment were in, could it be possible that satellites shortwave
satellites solved this problem? While still being a wireless radio signal?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC refuses to censor satellite radio Mike Terry Broadcasting 1 December 18th 04 06:00 PM
Satellite radio's new gadgets? Mike Terry Broadcasting 0 December 17th 04 01:44 AM
US satellite radio - defection to satellite radio may elevate medium Mike Terry Broadcasting 0 October 12th 04 03:29 AM
US satellite radio pins hopes on women, cars Mike Terry Broadcasting 0 October 12th 04 03:29 AM
Sirius satellite gets NFL football David Shortwave 0 December 17th 03 01:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017