| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dwight Stewart wrote:
Look, I'm not trying to defend the BPL industry here, so don't jump on me about it. Instead, I'm simply explaining the realities of the situation. I limited my prior comments to ham operators because that was the discussion. Yes, others have expressed concerns about BPL. But, again, without some very specific problem for the FCC to hang it's hat on, it has no justification whatsoever to stop BPL. Concerns expressed without substance simply isn't enough if that industry can shown it has taken reasonable steps to minimize problems where those concerns exist. When it comes specifically to the relatively small number of ham operators, even superficial steps to minimize problems is probably enough. If a BPL system started operating in your area and you could no longer use your amateur HF equipment because of the noise, would you be willing to give it up for the sake of better Internet access for more people? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
| Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
| Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | Policy | |||
| Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | CB | |||