Harris wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Arthur Harris wrote:

But, back to the original statement by DX Ace. He says I've been away too
long, and I need to get up to speed on this. So please elaborate. What WMD
finds have I missed since the invasion started?

You also need to get your meds adjusted.

Perhaps you might like to take a bit of a break, get that taken care of, then
wander back here when you might actually begin to think properly.

Get a clue Harris!

I'm beginning to see a pattern here. I give a detailed, well thought out
argument, and you respond with personal insults and statements like "you
need to do more research." I see few if any relevant responses from you to
the issues I've raised.

Perhaps it is because, unbeknownst to you, that your arguments are not really well
thought out, and they require only a passing comment?

Something for you to think about.

We've all been down your old, tired arguements about WMD's. When a Liberal 'tard is
in trouble, what does he reach for? Yes, that old stuff about WMD's.

dxAce

dxAce wrote:

Harris wrote:

I'm beginning to see a pattern here. I give a detailed, well thought out
argument, and you respond with personal insults and statements like "you
need to do more research." I see few if any relevant responses from you to
the issues I've raised.

Perhaps it is because, unbeknownst to you, that your arguments are not really well
thought out, and they require only a passing comment?

At least I'm arguing issues, and not just making personal insults. If my
arguments are so weak, why can't you rebut them with logic instead of
name calling?

We've all been down your old, tired arguements about WMD's. When a Liberal 'tard is
in trouble, what does he reach for? Yes, that old stuff about WMD's.

WMD is not just some tangential issue; it's the primary reason we got
ourselves into this mess.

Art H.

Harris wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Harris wrote:

I'm beginning to see a pattern here. I give a detailed, well thought out
argument, and you respond with personal insults and statements like "you
need to do more research." I see few if any relevant responses from you to
the issues I've raised.

Perhaps it is because, unbeknownst to you, that your arguments are not really well
thought out, and they require only a passing comment?

At least I'm arguing issues, and not just making personal insults.

No you're not. You're talking typical Liberal bull****.

Someday, (maybe) you'll learn the difference.

dxAce

dxAce wrote:

Harris wrote:

At least I'm arguing issues, and not just making personal insults.

No you're not. You're talking typical Liberal bull****.

Then at least reply with your typical conservative bull****.


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

In article et,
Harris wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Harris wrote:

I'm beginning to see a pattern here. I give a detailed, well thought out
argument, and you respond with personal insults and statements like "you
need to do more research." I see few if any relevant responses from you
to
the issues I've raised.

Perhaps it is because, unbeknownst to you, that your arguments are not
really well
thought out, and they require only a passing comment?

At least I'm arguing issues, and not just making personal insults.

Snip

Yes but your "issues" are personal and nobody else cares.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

dxAce wrote:

Harris wrote:

I'm beginning to see a pattern here. I give a detailed, well thought out
argument, and you respond with personal insults and statements like "you
need to do more research." I see few if any relevant responses from you to
the issues I've raised.

Perhaps it is because, unbeknownst to you, that your arguments are not really well
thought out, and they require only a passing comment?

Something for you to think about.

More likely that you can't offer a well thought out rebuttal to his
arguments.


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

In article ,
longwave wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Harris wrote:

I'm beginning to see a pattern here. I give a detailed, well thought out
argument, and you respond with personal insults and statements like "you
need to do more research." I see few if any relevant responses from you
to
the issues I've raised.

Perhaps it is because, unbeknownst to you, that your arguments are not
really well
thought out, and they require only a passing comment?

Something for you to think about.

More likely that you can't offer a well thought out rebuttal to his
arguments.

No it's more like if a person is to dense to understand then nothing you
can post will make a difference.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California