"David" wrote in message
...
It doesn't matter if they are the ''same''. They are dangerous
items
20 miles from Baghdad, easily used by the insurgency, and they were
unguarded. And Bush was moving the Army so quickly they left lots
of
these sites unguarded and these materials are now being used against
us.

Incompetence.

Yes, it was highly incompetent of you to the title your post with
reference to the "controversial" explosives at Al Qaaqaa, and now try
to backpeddle furiously to cover the fact you were distorting the
whole issue with phony "proof"-----just like your candidate.

Of course you're equally wrong about who was "moving the Army" (as if
Bush makes the battle plan), but comapred to the first gaffe that's
pretty minor. I doubt he's an armchair general like those
complaining about moving fast.


On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:04:49 -0400, "T. Early"
wrote:


"David" wrote in message
. ..
TV film of explosive material on 18 April 2003

http://www.kstp.com/article/stories/S3723.html?cat=1

Nice try, but factually deficient as usual. Next time you might
actually try reading.

"5 EYEWITNESS NEWS e-mailed pictures of the material we found to
experts in Washington Wednesday to see if it is the same kind of
high
explosives that went missing in Al Qaqaa. They could not make that
determination. "

Now why would they do this if what they found was "proof of
explosives
at Al Qaqaa."?