"Honus" wrote in message
news3VSd.54648$uc.23474@trnddc04...

"Brian Oakley" wrote in message
...

"Honus" wrote in message


Your failure is duly noted.

And certainly not unexpected.

So just because someone doesn't do exactly as you dictate, its failure.

Boy, you -are- a theist, aren't you? Classic, in fact. Twist and shout.

I know you mean that as a derogatory remark, but its far from that. If you
knew what theist meant, you would find a different word to use.


see. Lets all bow down to the person that screams the loudest. That's a
good
way to win an argument. Just call them a failure for lack of anything
YOU
could post to the contrary?

sigh Patrick made the positive assertion. Therefore, it's up to him to
provide support for his assertion. What are you, twelve? This stuff is all
so basic.

No not up to him. He can say and do what he wants. He doesnt have to prove
anything. This is a free country. If youre that concerned with proof, go
find it yourself. You wouldnt ask your employer to prove something to you
when he makes a statements. Because hed fire you. You would go look it up
yourself, hipocryte. So basic huh?

Now lets put the shoe on the other foot. You
asked him for proof.

Are you willing to back up your allegation that there
are NOT any on the ng that would rejoice at the death of a real
Christian?

I made no such allegation, theist. Show me where I did, or retract the
statement. You think you know where I was headed with Al; you're wrong.
Hell, boy...there are probably Christians around here that rejoice at the
death of a real Christian. By the way...your use of that term frightens
me.
People that think like that are dangerous. "Real" Christians? You ought to
know the dangers of that kind of thinking.

Sure you did. You did so in a reverse manner in asking Al to prove that
there were folks here that felt that way. Your wanting proof only shows a
wanting to silence anyone anytime you want them to be silenced. Thats
hogwash. Its obvious you dont know what Im talking about when I say real
Christians so I wouldnt pretend if I were you.

Statistics show that through the centuries, there are more that do
rejoice
at the death of Christians than there are of those that don't. That is
an
obvious historical fact, no one even has to look that up.

That's a good thing, because it -can't- be looked up. Statistics? Please.

Go read a history book. Go read the Sudanese newspapers. Do it yourself you
lazy lout.


There are plenty that rejoice at the deaths of Christians, and there
always
has been. They're are plenty that rejoice at the deaths of atheists, and
there always has been. There are always going to be people that rejoice at
the death of someone that they see as being on the other side. Your
assertion that more people rejoice at the deaths of Christians than don't
is
hyperbole. It's not an obvious historical fact, and you need to take a
long
hard look at the history of your faith before you start making remarks
like
that.

Again, go read a history book. Christians are the most persecuted people in
the world.

And seek some help with persecution complex of yours.

Dont have a complex sir. I see adhominim attacks are all you know how to do.
Go to debate school. Might learn something about free speech while youre
there as well.
B