Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Latest from the BBC: US to require passenger lists for flights NOT going to the US!
Yep, the latest antiterror rule from the Bushies will force all airlines
to give passenger lists to Washington for all flights just PASSING OVER US airspace. That's right, if the flight is NOT going to or from a US airport, but is merely passing over US airspace, the airline must give a passenger list to the US govt and it will be checked against the no fly list. This means that if a flight is going from Vancouver to Montreal, IOW a Canadian DOMESTIC flight, and the flight passes over US airspace (something that happens fairly often with Canadian domestic flights), the Canadian airline will have to check with Homeland Security first to see that no forbidden passengers are on it. This wacko rule was apparently prompted by a KLM flight from Amsterdam to Mexico City that had two Saudis on it that were on the no fly list, and the US govt found out about it and ordered the plane to return to Amsterdam or be shot down once it entered US airspace. Halfway through the flight the pilot had to turn around and go back. The airlines have two options: reroute flights around the US (impossible) or bow down to Bush and the idiots at Homeland Security (also impossible, since it would cost too much to clear every single flight passing over US airspace with DHS). The BBC interviewed some guy from AeroMexico (the Mexican national airline) who was NOT happy. He noted that the airline cannot afford to route flights around the US, but it would also be a severe strain on the airline to clear flights with DHS. He noted that this new rule violates international aviation law, but that the airline has no choice but to try to comply. Folks, when the US (Bush) can force something like this on foreign governments, it has too much power, and is misusing it. I wonder why this latest antiterror rule was NOT reported by US domestic media, maybe because this is a bridge too far? Yet another example of the power of shortwave. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Greetings Running Dog!
I understand the concern for what is going to be the inevitable loss of some of our "freedoms", but I can see the logic in this. I know it is easy to blame this person or that person for these changes, but the world is not the same as what we were brought up in. Who would have thought that people would have used planes filled with good people of all nationalities as weapons until 2001? That is the rational here. Most of the people on shortwave I would think probably find that the major networks are fairly liberal by most standards, yet they didn't report much of this except that the plane had to be turned around in mid flight. If they wanted to make Bush look bad they could have. The topic of terrorism and public safety is too sensitive to anyone, liberal or conservative. The preamble to the constitution sets the protection of the people as of the highest concern. I do know that one day it is going to go too far regarding our personal rights, but the argument will be that the rights of the many ourway the rights of the few. I hate slippery slopes and I believe we are on one, but sometimes someone comes up to you and pushes you down one and there is not much to do except to try not to get hurt. I wish we could turn the clock back to a safer time when the world made more sence, but alas. Have a great week! Jon. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
This is very hackable.
One simply takes a small plane into the US. US small airports, and especially private airports don't have YVR level security. All in all -- a bureaucratic solution to foreign aid and failed foreign policy problem. Not a single terrorist cell will be stopped from forming. There are plenty of flights going to South America from Africa. South America can be reached by Pacific Islands using routing that does not place one into US Pacific Islands Territories airspace. This policy will take many months to fully implement, and by then the groups in question will have adapted to the new transport conditions. Best solution: Get US birth certificates from children that died -- in order to get US passports. The US has no national "Births and Deaths" registry, like Iceland. Note: Small planes can land at remote airstrips, and take off with enough reserve fuel to return to Mexico. I suspect that Canadian domestic flights will have to be rerouted into Canadian airspace, a move long overdue. Yep, the latest antiterror rule from the Bushies will force all airlines to give passenger lists to Washington for all flights just PASSING OVER US airspace. That's right, if the flight is NOT going to or from a US airport, but is merely passing over US airspace, the airline must give a passenger list to the US govt and it will be checked against the no fly list. This means that if a flight is going from Vancouver to Montreal, IOW a Canadian DOMESTIC flight, and the flight passes over US airspace (something that happens fairly often with Canadian domestic flights), the Canadian airline will have to check with Homeland Security first to see that no forbidden passengers are on it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
running dogg wrote: Yep, the latest antiterror rule from the Bushies will force all airlines to give passenger lists to Washington for all flights just PASSING OVER US airspace. That's right, if the flight is NOT going to or from a US airport, but is merely passing over US airspace, the airline must give a passenger list to the US govt and it will be checked against the no fly list. This means that if a flight is going from Vancouver to Montreal, IOW a Canadian DOMESTIC flight, and the flight passes over US airspace (something that happens fairly often with Canadian domestic flights), the Canadian airline will have to check with Homeland Security first to see that no forbidden passengers are on it. This wacko rule was apparently prompted by a KLM flight from Amsterdam to Mexico City that had two Saudis on it that were on the no fly list, and the US govt found out about it and ordered the plane to return to Amsterdam or be shot down once it entered US airspace. Halfway through the flight the pilot had to turn around and go back. The airlines have two options: reroute flights around the US (impossible) or bow down to Bush and the idiots at Homeland Security (also impossible, since it would cost too much to clear every single flight passing over US airspace with DHS). The BBC interviewed some guy from AeroMexico (the Mexican national airline) who was NOT happy. He noted that the airline cannot afford to route flights around the US, but it would also be a severe strain on the airline to clear flights with DHS. He noted that this new rule violates international aviation law, but that the airline has no choice but to try to comply. Folks, when the US (Bush) can force something like this on foreign governments, it has too much power, and is misusing it. I wonder why this latest antiterror rule was NOT reported by US domestic media, maybe because this is a bridge too far? Yet another example of the power of shortwave. NOT reported? You really need to learn how to pay attention. dxAce Michigan USA |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I understand the concern for what is going to be the inevitable loss
of some of our "freedoms", but I can see the logic in this. Those who would trade freedom for security deserve neither... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
jon wrote: Greetings Running Dog! I understand the concern for what is going to be the inevitable loss of some of our "freedoms", but I can see the logic in this. How is requiring a foreign airline to provide a passenger list a loss of 'our freedoms'? Continue to tote. dxAce Michigan USA |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Finally some solid common sense security measures are being taken.
Be thankful Canadian flights are even allowed over US air space. "running dogg" wrote in message ... Yep, the latest antiterror rule from the Bushies will force all airlines to give passenger lists to Washington for all flights just PASSING OVER US airspace. That's right, if the flight is NOT going to or from a US airport, but is merely passing over US airspace, the airline must give a passenger list to the US govt and it will be checked against the no fly list. This means that if a flight is going from Vancouver to Montreal, IOW a Canadian DOMESTIC flight, and the flight passes over US airspace (something that happens fairly often with Canadian domestic flights), the Canadian airline will have to check with Homeland Security first to see that no forbidden passengers are on it. This wacko rule was apparently prompted by a KLM flight from Amsterdam to Mexico City that had two Saudis on it that were on the no fly list, and the US govt found out about it and ordered the plane to return to Amsterdam or be shot down once it entered US airspace. Halfway through the flight the pilot had to turn around and go back. The airlines have two options: reroute flights around the US (impossible) or bow down to Bush and the idiots at Homeland Security (also impossible, since it would cost too much to clear every single flight passing over US airspace with DHS). The BBC interviewed some guy from AeroMexico (the Mexican national airline) who was NOT happy. He noted that the airline cannot afford to route flights around the US, but it would also be a severe strain on the airline to clear flights with DHS. He noted that this new rule violates international aviation law, but that the airline has no choice but to try to comply. Folks, when the US (Bush) can force something like this on foreign governments, it has too much power, and is misusing it. I wonder why this latest antiterror rule was NOT reported by US domestic media, maybe because this is a bridge too far? Yet another example of the power of shortwave. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah,GOOD.I want the list too.I wonder if I am on the NO FLY **** List!?
(actually,I hope so) It doesn't make a **** to me one way or the other,I never did like flying anyway.I did some flying in some Helicopters in Vietnam,I didn't like it then either.****!!! flying! cuhulin |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Les the Loser,report Max Power to the authorities.
cuhulin |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Latest Online Oldies shows on Rock-it Radio | Broadcasting | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Importing Latest ILG Files Into RLDB (Radio Listeners Database [Mark Fine's]): How, Please ? | Shortwave | |||
Latest 50's Rock and Roll Shows Online | Broadcasting | |||
WANTED: Latest CPS For Astro Saber -- WILL TRADE | Swap |