Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MnMikew:
When I got my first amateur license (1969) I had an old karr cb radio driving a 100 watt amp which drove a final amp of 1200 watts. From there did couriers, johnsons, cobras, unidens, browning eagles, trams, etc on CB... Now I run an old russian 5KW linear. Thing is a battleship (100% keydown time at 3.5KW in), and 1 to 75MHz bandcoverage. At 1KW with reduced input voltage and drive it purrs, same russian tubes have been running in it for over two decades and constant usage, tubes still check out great. I have a newer 3.5KW unit but the old 5KW is my favorite. There is a lot to like about old equipment. I have ran newer amps but none finer than this old timer... australia is only a quick CQ away, anyday the band conditions are barely alive... CB has always been one hell of a lot more fun than amateur radio. I will always be a CB'er at heart, and an amateur second... John "MnMikew" wrote in message ... "beerbarrel" wrote in message ... On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:51:10 -0500, "MnMikew" wrote: "beerbarrel" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:21:35 -0400, dxAce wrote: The written test probably does as well. Should that also be dropped. If one can't learn even a minimum 5 WPM then they have no business in amateur radio. 5 WPM is incredibly easy, heck, even the 'tards should be able to master that. dxAce Michigan USA CW is not going to go away just because they drop the requirement. Like Steve says, It's not that hard. Most anyone can learn 5 wpm in as little as a month or less. I think that something worth having is worth earning. I say give techs a piece of HF and if they like HF, they can take the test to get access to the rest of it. I'm half-heartedly studying for the tech test and only really have interest in 2m right now. I guess I would never agree to that because I worked to pass the test. It's just like the older guys doing 18 wpm. They don't see 5 wpm as a test. If they gave Tech's a small piece of the HF band can you imagine the crowd on that band? I think that you would wind up hating HF because you would be fighting pile ups all the time. Bottom line, I think that it would make you feel better to earn it rather than have it given to you. It makes you appreciate it more. It's not going to help at all to cut CW. It won't bring more folks into ham radio. It will only serve to create more traffic on the HF bands. As far as 2m goes, It's great for a little while, but it gets boring pretty quick. HF is they way to go. You will see. THATS MY POINT! Sure it might get crowded, I doubt it but it could happen. Seems the more the merrier? So people get bored on 2 and 6m and eventually drop out of ham radio. Perhaps if their interest was peaked with some HF they'd get motivated to get the code. Or if they dont like HF, no biggie. Guess I could always get an amp and a modded Galaxy. :-) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC proposes to drop CW requirement on HF | CB | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FCC to Drop HF Code Requirement | Boatanchors | |||
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |