On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:21:50 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:


Ok, Mr. "Goldwater Republican"! Perhaps you can explain your understanding
of what control(s) and/or influence(s) the "founding documents" have on
today's free-market economy? Please be kind enough to advise which specific
"founding document(s)" you base your personal understanding on. Something
in your own words would be nice, though I will understand if you want to
try and sneak in a bit of copy you lifted off some web site. After all, I
rather doubt you have even a general understanding of the subject. Don't
wear yourself out -- Two or three knowledgable paragraphs would be
sufficient.

It would be appreciated if everyone else would be patient and allow rickets
to demonstrate he has a solid grasp of the subject matter. Let's see what
he comes up with, eh? Perhaps this is his strongest subject!

-=jd=-
You are way too hostile. Cool off a little bit and maybe we can talk.

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 02:34:54 GMT, "Jeff"
wrote:


What does the founding documents have to do with the price of
eggs??? The government does not, should not be involved in private
industry. ????????????????????????????????????


Our Revolution was started because of predatory pricing by
multinational corporations, in cahoots with the government, forcing
local entenpreneurs out of business.

The government's tax structure should benefit domestic companies and
punish those who use slave labor in Third World countries.

Fair Trade = Good

Free Trade = Bad

Seems to me =jd= is a pretty cool guy and he is very paitent and he sums
things up very well.I am not kissing up,I am only saying it like it is.
cuhulin

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 08:56:51 -0500, wrote:

Seems to me =jd= is a pretty cool guy and he is very paitent and he sums
things up very well.I am not kissing up,I am only saying it like it is.
cuhulin

He's a typical ''in the bubble'' hot-head. He thinks if he gets mad
it makes his arguments more logical.

Faith-based politics is a one-way ticket to Hell.

I do NOT agree with raiseing other "nations" standards of anything!
cuhulin

You're selfish *******, ain't yeh?

Bruce Jensen

rickets,,,,,, awwww,ferget it!
cuhulin

Yep.Mr.Jensen.What do you think about those bush third worlders in Long
Island,New York (I love New York) running their sewage down the streets?
Yeah,I am selfish.Sue Me!
cuhulin

Yep.Mr.Jensen.What do you think about those bush third worlders in Long
Island,New York (I love New York) running their sewage down the
streets?
Yeah,I am selfish.Sue Me!
cuhulin

Well, that exactly makes my point. If, assuming we in the US are on a
stable footing economically, can afford to help third world nations get
a leg up, we *might* accomplish a couple of things:

(1) Make their lives better - we're good guys;
(2) Help them take pride in their own living conditions - less sewage
in the streets;
(3) Make it palatable for them to stay in their own countries,
*helping* to solve both our own border security problems and homeland
overpopulation potential.

Once they reach a higher standard, we can then begin to deal with them
like the humans they are instead of as a scary potential plague.

This approach has been tried in some coastal desert African nations,
and so far the results have been quite positive - formerly starving
people now have enough food grown by ecologically benign means, plus
enough to sell or barter to others, AND they have, for the first time
in their lives, free time to enjoy life a little bit instead of
groveling for every cockroach every minute of the day. Cost to
civilized nations footing the bill - minimal. Potential benefits in
long term to entire region - enormous.

I'm not saying it will work everywhere - but every mouth fed with
healthy food today is another stomach that won't be desperate tomorrow,
and that can't be all bad.

Bruce Jensen

Mr.Jensen,respectably,I say NUKE them a..holes.Is there sewage runnin
down the streets here in Jackson,Mississippi? You come show me!
cuhulin

They hate our guts.
cuhulin