OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
 

Let me see if one of them girls next door to me is home over there from
work yet.I hope it's Julie because she cusses just like I cuss.I think I
heard her pickup truck just now.Vanessa is prettier than Julie and
Vanessa doesn't use filthy dirty language either.
cuhulin

OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
 

Raining like a Cow peein on a brown flat rock.It isn't actually raining
here though.I know you will go to www.srh.noaa.gov (or sompin like
that) and see I am not lieing.
cuhulin

OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
 

U.S.fed govts and AWOL GAY BISEXUAL MORON GAY FAGGOT GAY bush LOVES
'''Bald Heads"" JIHAD TERRORIST BUDDY!!!!!.
www.homelandsecurityus.com
cuhulin

OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
 

On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 04:47:51 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



wrote:

On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 23:12:44 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



wrote:

On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:09:31 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



David "I don't know a damn thing about shortwave" Rickets wrote:

On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:47:22 -0400, dxAce
wrote:




Yep, at least three more years without some brain stem liberal in the Presidency...

You prefer a Nationalist Socialist? Why?

Did I mention anything at all about a National Socialist, brain stem?

Jeez, some parrot taught dzArse a new insult -- now he has
four to use in each posting.


Please try to pay attention, at least once in your life. I know it's difficult, but with
some medication and some therapy, things might actually work out for you.

Why? It did nothing for you, brainless stem.

'Brainless stem' is an oxymoron, 'tard.

Not when the brain has withered off the stem, as has yours.


You'll have to do better than that to beat the 'ol dxAce in most any endeavour.

Easily done, with one brain tied behind my back.

You must have stolen it as you certainly never had one of your own.

Keep trying 'tard boy.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


Lamer, lamer.

OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
 

On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:49:24 -0500, clifto wrote:

Carter-K8VT wrote:
Well, you are right. Logging a "few" trees won't damage the forest.
However, what logging company is going to set up an operation for only a
"few" trees? Let's try and be a little more realistic here...

Forests, left to their own devices, end up with trees far too close
together for good root growth and effective nutrient absorption. Lots
die. The dead ones end up fueling forest fires that take all the trees.
Most logging companies today would take trees in such a way as to let
the remaining trees have room to grow, so they can come back in a dozen
years and harvest again.

Actually they scream rape when told to do that -- they'd rther
clearcut, re-seed and move on. They constantly bitch about the cost of
low-impact logging like removal by helicopter. All they want is huge
gravel roads fed from the side by skid roads.

OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
 

Carter - 'decimate' means 1 in 10 [.]

OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
 

On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:12:23 GMT, Carter-K8VT
wrote:

MnMikew wrote:

This probably does happen on Potlatch owned land though they dont
leave a few trees to reseed, the replant millions of new trees.


...and do you think they would re-plant "millions of trees" if they
weren't forced to by the "eco-nazi" laws you love to hate?

Millions of monoculture trees, for their own future benefit,
nothing like what was destroyed.

OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
 

On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:40:38 -0500, "MnMikew"
wrote:


"Carter-K8VT" wrote in message
. ..
MnMikew wrote:

This probably does happen on Potlatch owned land though they dont
leave a few trees to reseed, the replant millions of new trees.


...and do you think they would re-plant "millions of trees" if they
weren't forced to by the "eco-nazi" laws you love to hate?

Forced? What happens to a farmer is he dosent replant?


Farmers don't move on. The lumber companies do. They'd not
replant if they could get away wih it. What they do replant is only
what they can come back to take again.

OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
 

CLIFTO,

OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
 

RHF wrote:

Carter - 'decimate' means 1 in 10 [.]

Yup, technically you are right, but yours is the third definition of
three listed in the Yahoo dictionary. The first two were what I had in
mind...[emphasis added]:

1. To destroy or kill a *large part of* (a group).

2. Usage Problem
1. To inflict *great* destruction or damage on
2. To *reduce markedly* in amount

3. To select by lot and kill one in every ten of.