![]() |
OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
MnMikew wrote:
This probably does happen on Potlatch owned land though they dont leave a few trees to reseed, the replant millions of new trees. ....and do you think they would re-plant "millions of trees" if they weren't forced to by the "eco-nazi" laws you love to hate? |
OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
|
OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
You don't know the First thing about "General Sherman" in the War Of
Northern Aggression.You go to the rear of the class and take a seat. cuhulin |
OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
dxAce is doing very well,,, in my opinion.
cuhulin |
OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
www.devilfinder.com Mississippi Logging Industry
We have more Forest here in Mississippi than any other State in U.S.A. www.devilfinder.com Mississippi Trivia y'all ever hear of any wildfires here in Mississippi before? Of Course NOT!,, We know how to manage our Mississippi Forest areas.(now,watch them gay queer freaks tree huggers go crazy) My old buddy's Uncle was a Train driver on the Fernwood,Gulf Logging Railroad wayyyyyyy down South (South is always best) in South Mississippi many,many years ago. cuhulin (Paladinnnnn,,,,,, Paladinnnn,,,,,, where do you roammmmm,,,,,,,) |
OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
y'all ever hear of any wildfires here in Mississippi before? Of Course
NOT!,, We know how to manage our Mississippi Forest areas.(now,watch them gay queer freaks tree huggers go crazy) Wildfires are quite a bit less common in areas where relative humidity is fairly high, like in Mississippi. New England also has very few. Here in the arid west, grassfires and forest fires seem to almost pop up spontaneously (they don't of course, but a single spark here can ignite a conflagration that will be very hard to quell. The air is too dry.). Bruce Jensen |
OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
Carter-K8VT wrote:
Well, you are right. Logging a "few" trees won't damage the forest. However, what logging company is going to set up an operation for only a "few" trees? Let's try and be a little more realistic here... Forests, left to their own devices, end up with trees far too close together for good root growth and effective nutrient absorption. Lots die. The dead ones end up fueling forest fires that take all the trees. Most logging companies today would take trees in such a way as to let the remaining trees have room to grow, so they can come back in a dozen years and harvest again. -- If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination, my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin. |
OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
Carter-K8VT wrote:
...and do you think they would re-plant "millions of trees" if they weren't forced to by the "eco-nazi" laws you love to hate? Yes. Unlike you, they think a few years ahead and realize that planting trees now makes trees to harvest years from now. -- If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination, my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin. |
OT Score One For The Tree Huggers
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:49:24 -0500, clifto wrote:
Carter-K8VT wrote: Well, you are right. Logging a "few" trees won't damage the forest. However, what logging company is going to set up an operation for only a "few" trees? Let's try and be a little more realistic here... Forests, left to their own devices, end up with trees far too close together for good root growth and effective nutrient absorption. Lots die. The dead ones end up fueling forest fires that take all the trees. Most logging companies today would take trees in such a way as to let the remaining trees have room to grow, so they can come back in a dozen years and harvest again. That's the craziest thing I've read in a long time. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com