Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Twinlead has less signal loss than coax so it's
preferred in reception areas where signal strengths are low. Should I be worried about this? Currently the twinlead only runs from the top of the antenna to where it enters my house. About 40 ft. Then I have coax in my crawl space for another 80 feet or so. 30 ft of which is just coiled and wasted. Reception for local (Sacramento) stations is pretty good. Reception for San Francisco stations is too grainy to watch at times. My zip code is 95682. (So I should not expect too much from San Francisco.) If need be I can replace the existing twinlead with new twinlead. Should I look into this? jg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Confused & Annoyed - My new Antenna does not work - What To Do Next ? | Shortwave | |||
FS: RG-213/U Coax Cable | Antenna | |||
FS: RG-213/U Coax Cable | CB | |||
FS: RG-58C/U Coax Cable, Military quality at very low cost | CB | |||
Coax cable interferance? | Antenna |