Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
Dr.Ace wrote: "john" wrote in message ... Slow Code is a disgrace to Amateur Radio! I doubt that SC even has a call sign . Ace - WH2T you may be right But honestly I don't think so I beleive that SC is a older hams who moved to some retirement village, did not read the fine print, and so can't go on the air anymore and having put his saving in it is just plain screwed andf unable to move and not driving much can't go HF mobile even and he come on here and takes it out on us |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
"john" wrote in message ... Slow Code is a disgrace to Amateur Radio! I doubt that SC even has a call sign . Ace - WH2T |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
"Thats Right_ 20wpm" wrote in message ... Slow Code is the kind of guy that everybodys hates on the air. He is the Jammer because no one listens to him. Probably because he doesn't have an amateur radio license . Ace - WH2T |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
"Dr.Ace" wrote in
: "Thats Right_ 20wpm" wrote in message ... Slow Code is the kind of guy that everybodys hates on the air. He is the Jammer because no one listens to him. Probably because he doesn't have an amateur radio license . Ace - WH2T Tnx, 73, good luck in the contest. SC |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
"Dr.Ace" wrote in
: "john" wrote in message ... Slow Code is a disgrace to Amateur Radio! I doubt that SC even has a call sign . Ace - WH2T Tnx, 73, Good luck in the contest. SC |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
Slow Code wrote: Improving your skills doesn't make you a better operator? Sheeesh. Mike, skill. Singular. There is no skill test for any other mode. You can still have your microphone, but you should have to pass a code test before you're allowed to use it. I like 5 WPM for Tech, 13 for General, and 20wpm for Extra, but then, I'm not lazy. SC You may not be lazy, but you're fully prepared to kill off amateur radio with archaic requirements. I guess if you can't have the amateur radio the way you want it, to hell with it all. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
" wrote in
oups.com: From: on Sat, Oct 21 2006 4:01pm wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: according to him anyone not devoted to cw is a lowlfie That's really sad. ...and pathetic. No one should have to go through life as a lowlfie. (extraneous groups deleted) So who do you think Slow Code is? Kelly? Coslo? Deignan? I haven't the slightest idea. Well, I know "Slow Code" is not me. Beyond that, he could be anybody with a computer and an internet connection. "Slow Code" could be Len Anderson, who has used at least seven different screen names here - that we know of. How many screen names have you used here - that you know of? Jimmie will NEVER admit to using any pseudonyms. :-) Jimmie is a proud amateur "serving his country in other ways" such as playing with his radio hobby, spreading "international good will" by working DX on HF with CW. :-) "Slow Code" could be Brian Burke, N0IMD, Slow Code could be Jim/N2EY, despite protests that it isn't him. Not in Miccolis' petty prissy manner of "always being correct." [i.e., thinking as Miccolis thinks...all else is "wrong"] Miccolis already tried at least one pseudonym. That pesudo STOPPED when confronted. [that's in the Google archives] But, but, but...Miccolis (who never swears) swears "it wasn't him!" AS IF. :-) Ditto Robesin, Coslo, Bruce, Dan, Larry Roll, or anyone else who "appears" to be absent from RRAP. Maybe it is Val Germann, frustrated that he can't get his (code speed) up? :-) Could even be KH2D after starting the Alzheimer's route...who knows? Maybe it is Lamont Cranston? "Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of No-Coders?" :-) who has used a wide variety of screen names here, ("billy beeper", "hot ham and cheese", to name just a few) usually without including his name or callsign. I understand that Brian Burke has received a whole lot less spam email on his regular user account than when he posted here under his name and call. I also understand that he let go of "Billy Beeper" at Han's Brakob's request, as "Billy Beeper" was an invention of Hans, a fictitious boy who feared evil No-Coders. There's lots of fictitious BOYS in here fearing evil No-Coders. Most of them use pseudonyms. No guts. No courage. No brains. They hide behind their BFO-enabled beeping, afraid to stray beyond the anonymity of their monotonic dots and dashes...and dreams of glory and honor via morsemanship..."serving their country in 'other' ways." :-) Wheeew! Thank god you expelled most of your gas in your last post you didn't have a lot left over for this one. No Len. Most RRAPers aren't pro-CW, but you think they're pro code because they're willing to learn it for a license. Larry, Dee and Me are the only pro 'Keep the code test' people in the group anymore. SC |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
Slow Code wrote: wrote in ps.com: Slow Code wrote: Improving your skills doesn't make you a better operator? Sheeesh. Mike, skill. Singular. There is no skill test for any other mode. You can still have your microphone, but you should have to pass a code test before you're allowed to use it. I like 5 WPM for Tech, 13 for General, and 20wpm for Extra, but then, I'm not lazy. SC You may not be lazy, but you're fully prepared to kill off amateur radio with archaic requirements. I guess if you can't have the amateur radio the way you want it, to hell with it all. We have to dumb it down to keep it from dying? SC We have to remove unnecessary and superfluous licensing requirements. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GRAYLAND 2004 FALL DXPEDITION: Compiled Logs for Oct 15-17 (Part 1) | Shortwave | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Rare Books on Radio and Electronics | Shortwave |