Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message So who do you think "Slow Code" is? Coslo? Miccolis? Roll? Deignan? Dan, Dan the CB Radio Man? Haven't a clue on Slow Code. The style doesn't sound like Coslo or Miccolis. Obviously it's someone who's been here awhile. Don't really know the style of the other fellows writing. Troll was the racist poster ("My favorite black on the bus...," and "Welfare mothers of Color with their hands out..."). I delete such without reading them and generally delete all the resulting posts. Yep. That's a helluva thing for a 20 year veteran to be saying. I'm sure he had to spend a fair amount of time in the "Social Actions" office with them trying to reeducate him. And the totally laughable part of all that was that he said he had a degree in human resources and was trying to land a position in that field. Deignan was the vanity callsign collector and the original "RF Commando." He called me a liar when I said he had collected 12 callsigns, but I was wrong - one of the callsigns actually belonged to his wife at the same address. So I guess I was a liar after all. I should have known that he had a Ham Wife that collected vanity callsigns, too. There are way too many people that confuse honest mistakes with lying. Don't be one of them. I'm not, though I do throw it in Robesin's face when he call an opinion that differes from his "A LIE!" The FCC has been getting on people for doing that and making them justify the calls or give them up. They got on Deignan, too. Deignan's buddy in Hawaii loaned him his PO Box number so he could scam some Hawaiin calls, meanwhile, the Hawaiin PO Box owner was scamming a Guam callsign. Never been to Guam and could have operated /KH2 like I did for two years. I guess a Hawaiin Call Stroke Guam Call is a pretty cool thing... Don't see why. But again the FCC is getting wise to such antics. With some of these guys they think it adds to their credential. It's like the JA's using a JA owned hotel address on Guam to get the Guam 1x2 calls. But collecting 11 different call and then turning some of them into Hawaiin calls is just another form of megalomania that we see on RRAP. In QRZ.com, in the name search, type in "RF Commando" or something like that. Nevermind, I'll do it... There are 1 records matching +rf* +commando* KB1CCE RF COMMANDOS RHODE ISLAND CHAPTER There are 3 records matching +Deignan* KH6HZ DEIGNAN MICHAEL P (This one is a Hawaiin call with a MA addy) WE1RD MICHAEL P DEIGNAN REPEATER ASSOCIATION (This one in Rhode Island, weird) The 3rd is a yl in Canada, so I'm not posting that. Anyway, all three of the above calls are at different addresses. Anyway, these are the guys who pass judgement on me because I am too fat, lazy, and stupid to buy into the whole Morse Exam stuff at 5, and then 13, and then 20 WPM. Depends on how bad you want the privileges. Just don't ask for something for nothing. Originally I had no interest in ham radio but my husband at the time dragged me to a class as something we could do together. As I got involved, I found it interesting. I deduced very early on that what I wanted to get out of ham radio would best be served by going all the way to Extra. Since I wanted the privileges, I met the requirements including the 20 wpm. So if he dragged you to a class, how did you end up presiding over the class that took him to Extra? Not everyone wants those privileges. Kim is a case in point. She is a Tech Plus and could have gotten her General with just a written test and no further code testing as of April 2000. She chose not to because she did not really like HF operations. The typical background static of HF bothers her. Her interests lie in VHF and up. Since she has full privileges there, the General does not serve her goals. Yep. Technician is a whole lot of priveleges. That's the beauty of anon postings, they don't have to follow their own "style." Very true. But it takes a lot of discipline to consistently write in a different style and not make tell tale slips. When Len Anderson was posting as Avery Fineman, it was quite obvious they were the same person. When I post as Hot-Ham, there's no intent to deceive. There is an intent to have a throw-away email address that I've checked the mailbox content about twice. It can fill up with all that spam that the spammers desire. I Am What I Am. That a famous quote of Popeye. I began posting as hot-ham when I gave up Billy Beeper at Hans request. I'd prefer to not post with my name and/or call as I used to, as I seem to get lots and lots of spam when I do. Meanwhile, Robesin has posted my name, call and address much more than I have. That's so swell of him. I guess when Mark posts Robesin's address and phone number, it's just tit for tat. No? Doesn't really matter as with the internet this information is findable one way or another if one cares to go after it. Posting it here only shows that you have the internet search skills of any average user and get some kind of juvenile thrill out of posting it. Dee, N8UZE The intent is to intimidate. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Slow Code wrote: Larry, Dee and Me are the only pro 'Keep the code test' people in the group anymore. SC Then the presentation of sound reasoning has been successful. No most of them have left due to the spam created by Mark Morgan, I see Mark Morgan as the necessary balance in the vicious postings by Robesin. He doesn't need to create dozens of posts to refute each one. You don't get to decide that. Has Robesin accused you of lesbian encounters or pedophilia? When he does, I'll be sure to keep track of the ratio of Robesin postings to Dee postings. Well if such an odd thing should ever happen, I'll killfile him. I refuse to get sucked into such stupidity. And one day when your job depends on a security background investigation and accusations of homosexuality, pedophilia, and rape... Many of Mark's posts are and were quite vicious. Um, yeh. It's really awful, isn't it? Almost as bad as accusing people of rape. I killfiled Morgan the day he made unacceptable comments about Steve's deceased daughter. Did you know that his daughter was severly retarded, and he makes jokes about "the short bus" on RRAP? I doubt that his daughter was well off enough to ride the short bus that Robesin pokes fun at.. I don't particularly care for either one's tactics and stay out of that mess. Fair enough. We actually have very little in common. We both claim to be amateur radio operator and military veterans. I got chopped to the US Army twice, so I know a little bit about the Army. I also got chopped to the US Navy once, and there and at service schools, and in Somalia, was fairly close to the USMC. As far as amateur radio goes, the only one of these bozos I've ever QSO'd was Heil when I was DX on Guam. the interminable pontification of Len Anderson, Yeh, well, we have Jim who served in other ways. I'm sure he has something to be proud of, too, but so far he hasn't mentioned it in other ways. I happen to remember the post. He said that one can serve in other ways. He did not say whether he himself served in the military or in other ways. Even worse. Yet based on that comment, Len Anderson and others have made ASSumptions. Jim's had YEARS to clarify, and he's been questioned SPECIFICALLY about that comment. the compulsive responses that some seem to feel that they must post to the spam, the vulgarity of people like Opus, I guess you conveniently forgot Dan and Bruce's postings to Kim.... Long time ago, but I think I mentioned it was stupid of them. Stupid? It was sexual harassment. That's illegal isn't it? Hard to say. One would have to weigh it against the specific wording of the law and adjudicated cases to determine if it was or was not illegal. Good side-step. Are Bruce and Dan in your killfile? Are "thier" anonymous characters in your killfile? However, she's an adult and is capable of dealing with these people on her own. Yeh, right. You didn't like her politics, so she's on her own. How do you come to that conclusion? I know very little about her politics and it wouldn't matter if I did. As I recall, she defended her choice far better than I or anyone else could have done it for her. I supported her right to choose a legally available call sign even though I thought her choice a little strange. It's not within my power to make others accept it. Talk about not just sexist, but bonifide sexual harassment (and Jim never once chimed in to say boo).... As tasteless and tacky as it was, it may not have actually meet the legal definition of sexual harassment. She was not threatened with a job loss or with an overall loss in her quality of life. Discussion groups are not for the faint of heart, especially ones like these newsgroups. Participation in these news groups does not contribute to quality of life in any significant way. It is an idle and insignificant form of recreation. She chose the call sign. I believe she did. Yup. A simple check of the call sign database shows that it is a vanity call. So it was hers by choice. I don't recall for sure but didn't she say she did it on a dare? Never filled out a Form 610 while drunk? Me either. It's not up to him or me or any one else to defend her other than to say it was her right. I believe that I commented that I thought it was a poor choice but it was up to her. I believe you did just that. So when a YL wearing a slit skirt and a push-up bra gets raped...? Not the same thing at all and you very well know it. True, by magnitudes. But it's still abuse. Her overall quality of life is seriously affected and her life could even be in danger. Besides rapists don't care what the victim is wearing. They are looking for some one they can successfully dominate and terrorize. The shy school girl in the dowdy clothes hurrying home with her books clutched to her chest is just as likely or even more likely to be raped than the brazen hookers down on Eight Mile (that's a Detroit reference). Dee from Deetroit? I like Michigan but Detroit isn't my favorite place. Was she asking for it and is she on her own? See my comment above. If I saw some one being threatened with violence and it were within my power to do something about it, I would. It wouldn't matter if it were that shy school girl or that brazen hooker. Today, I'd have to limit myself to calling for help but in my younger, more fit days, I'd also have taken an active (i.e. physical) part in her defense. Fair enough. the slamming that people like Slow Code do to those who licensed or will license under the current system and so on. He's only saying what the PCTA Extras would like to say without their callsigns attached to it. I'm a pro code test advocate and an Extra. I would never have guessed. I would never hide behind anonymity. Jim does. And I do not hold the candidates responsible for the quality or extent of the tests. They have no choice in the matter. What the new ham does have a choice in is to either stagnate or progress. He can gain the experience to then join in discussions and contribute or he can put his foot in his mouth with such inexperienced statements as "you need an amplifier to work DX" or "you can't work Texas from Michigan on VHF". However even then, I try to avoid anything that could be taken as a put down because I want them to stay in ham radio and grow and develop. I'll invite them over to work a contest with my measly 100 watts or I'll introduce them to one of the QRP enthusiasts. I'll invite them to work the VHF station at Field Day and pair them up with one of our VHF experts. It's called being a good ham and an Elmer. No "shack on a belt" quips? Nope. Why should I? It accomplishes nothing. I want people to enjoy ham radio. I want their motivation to develop to be based on the joy they get out of it and the joy they see others get out of it. Sarcasm does not serve that objective. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE I think amateur radio is one of the best hobbies ever, and it can also serve in an emergency communications roll. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: [snip] Depends on how bad you want the privileges. Just don't ask for something for nothing. Originally I had no interest in ham radio but my husband at the time dragged me to a class as something we could do together. As I got involved, I found it interesting. I deduced very early on that what I wanted to get out of ham radio would best be served by going all the way to Extra. Since I wanted the privileges, I met the requirements including the 20 wpm. So if he dragged you to a class, how did you end up presiding over the class that took him to Extra? Different husband. My previous husband dragged me to the Tech class. We split up a few years later. Then after that I met the man who was to become my current husband. It is my current husband who took the Extra class that I was teaching. Sorry for the confusion there. Although it would have been possible for me to have taught my previous husband since I reached Extra a couple of months before he did. Not everyone wants those privileges. Kim is a case in point. She is a Tech Plus and could have gotten her General with just a written test and no further code testing as of April 2000. She chose not to because she did not really like HF operations. The typical background static of HF bothers her. Her interests lie in VHF and up. Since she has full privileges there, the General does not serve her goals. Yep. Technician is a whole lot of priveleges. That's the beauty of anon postings, they don't have to follow their own "style." Very true. But it takes a lot of discipline to consistently write in a different style and not make tell tale slips. When Len Anderson was posting as Avery Fineman, it was quite obvious they were the same person. When I post as Hot-Ham, there's no intent to deceive. There is an intent to have a throw-away email address that I've checked the mailbox content about twice. It can fill up with all that spam that the spammers desire. I Am What I Am. That a famous quote of Popeye. And I don't criticize some one who does that. It is only when there is the apparent intent to deceive (Len Anderson) or the appaerent intent to violate their ISPs TOS (Mark Morgan), that it is unreasonable. I began posting as hot-ham when I gave up Billy Beeper at Hans request. I'd prefer to not post with my name and/or call as I used to, as I seem to get lots and lots of spam when I do. Meanwhile, Robesin has posted my name, call and address much more than I have. That's so swell of him. I guess when Mark posts Robesin's address and phone number, it's just tit for tat. No? Doesn't really matter as with the internet this information is findable one way or another if one cares to go after it. Posting it here only shows that you have the internet search skills of any average user and get some kind of juvenile thrill out of posting it. Dee, N8UZE The intent is to intimidate. Such an attempt is foolish. Anyone who is intimidated by that must not be aware how easy that information is to find these days. Dee, N8UZE |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
wrote in message ups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Slow Code wrote: Larry, Dee and Me are the only pro 'Keep the code test' people in the group anymore. SC Then the presentation of sound reasoning has been successful. No most of them have left due to the spam created by Mark Morgan, I see Mark Morgan as the necessary balance in the vicious postings by Robesin. He doesn't need to create dozens of posts to refute each one. You don't get to decide that. Has Robesin accused you of lesbian encounters or pedophilia? When he does, I'll be sure to keep track of the ratio of Robesin postings to Dee postings. Well if such an odd thing should ever happen, I'll killfile him. I refuse to get sucked into such stupidity. And one day when your job depends on a security background investigation and accusations of homosexuality, pedophilia, and rape... Whether or not I were to respond to such accusations would make no difference as the postings would still be in the archive. If it did cause a problem in that area, I'd certainly take legal action against the poster and the company who accepted such unfounded accusations. [snip] Stupid? It was sexual harassment. That's illegal isn't it? Hard to say. One would have to weigh it against the specific wording of the law and adjudicated cases to determine if it was or was not illegal. Good side-step. No not a side step. I'm not a lawyer, judge, legal expert, or a juror weighing evidence in such a case. So I don't have sufficient data to make such a judgement. Are Bruce and Dan in your killfile? Are "thier" anonymous characters in your killfile? They've been gone so long, I don't know. I clean out the file and start it over about once or twice a year. [snip] Dee from Deetroit? I like Michigan but Detroit isn't my favorite place. Actually I live in one of the suburbs not Detroit itself. However, there are some good things in Detroit. They have a full slate of pro sports teams and an absolutely wonderful opera company. [snip] I think amateur radio is one of the best hobbies ever, and it can also serve in an emergency communications roll. On that we agree. So on that upbeat note, let's conclude this extensive discussion (it was fun but we've kind of beaten it to death) and go work some radio. Dee, N8UZE |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
Mark in the Dark, wrote in
: On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 00:07:22 GMT, Slow Code wrote: "A. G. Bell" anon@anon wrote in : you sure do post your crap fast Your **** pile is higher Markie. It's so large, you dug a hole in it and live in it like it was a cave. Learn CW! SC |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: [snip] Depends on how bad you want the privileges. Just don't ask for something for nothing. Originally I had no interest in ham radio but my husband at the time dragged me to a class as something we could do together. As I got involved, I found it interesting. I deduced very early on that what I wanted to get out of ham radio would best be served by going all the way to Extra. Since I wanted the privileges, I met the requirements including the 20 wpm. So if he dragged you to a class, how did you end up presiding over the class that took him to Extra? Different husband. My previous husband dragged me to the Tech class. We split up a few years later. Then after that I met the man who was to become my current husband. It is my current husband who took the Extra class that I was teaching. Sorry for the confusion there. No problem. Although it would have been possible for me to have taught my previous husband since I reached Extra a couple of months before he did. Anyone can teach a class licensed or not, but an Extra (actually 3 Extras) must proctor the Extra exam. Not everyone wants those privileges. Kim is a case in point. She is a Tech Plus and could have gotten her General with just a written test and no further code testing as of April 2000. She chose not to because she did not really like HF operations. The typical background static of HF bothers her. Her interests lie in VHF and up. Since she has full privileges there, the General does not serve her goals. Yep. Technician is a whole lot of priveleges. That's the beauty of anon postings, they don't have to follow their own "style." Very true. But it takes a lot of discipline to consistently write in a different style and not make tell tale slips. When Len Anderson was posting as Avery Fineman, it was quite obvious they were the same person. When I post as Hot-Ham, there's no intent to deceive. There is an intent to have a throw-away email address that I've checked the mailbox content about twice. It can fill up with all that spam that the spammers desire. I Am What I Am. That a famous quote of Popeye. And I don't criticize some one who does that. It is only when there is the apparent intent to deceive (Len Anderson) or the appaerent intent to violate their ISPs TOS (Mark Morgan), that it is unreasonable. Welp, good breeding keeps me from doing what Robesin does. And Robesin wasn't stopped until someone out-assholed him. All Mark asked for was an apology for being called a rapist. Robesin couldn't do that. I began posting as hot-ham when I gave up Billy Beeper at Hans request. I'd prefer to not post with my name and/or call as I used to, as I seem to get lots and lots of spam when I do. Meanwhile, Robesin has posted my name, call and address much more than I have. That's so swell of him. I guess when Mark posts Robesin's address and phone number, it's just tit for tat. No? Doesn't really matter as with the internet this information is findable one way or another if one cares to go after it. Posting it here only shows that you have the internet search skills of any average user and get some kind of juvenile thrill out of posting it. Dee, N8UZE The intent is to intimidate. Such an attempt is foolish. Anyone who is intimidated by that must not be aware how easy that information is to find these days. Dee, N8UZE Information coupled with action is called stalking. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GRAYLAND 2004 FALL DXPEDITION: Compiled Logs for Oct 15-17 (Part 1) | Shortwave | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Rare Books on Radio and Electronics | Shortwave |