Mike Coslo wrote:
I won't say that global warming is happening or not.

Of course, global warming is happening. It has been
going on for tens of thousands of years and happens
every time the earth cyclically emerges from an ice
age as it is doing now.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

Cecil Moore wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote:

I won't say that global warming is happening or not.


Of course, global warming is happening. It has been
going on for tens of thousands of years and happens
every time the earth cyclically emerges from an ice
age as it is doing now.


I'm speaking of CO2 based global warming, whether as the results of say
volcanic activity, or as a result of the amount of CO2 added to the
atmosphere as a result of combustion release.


May I assume that you believe that glacial cycles are the sole source
of global warming or cooling?

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -

Mike Coslo wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote:

I won't say that global warming is happening or not.



Of course, global warming is happening. It has been
going on for tens of thousands of years and happens
every time the earth cyclically emerges from an ice
age as it is doing now.



I'm speaking of CO2 based global warming, whether as the results of
say volcanic activity, or as a result of the amount of CO2 added to the
atmosphere as a result of combustion release.


May I assume that you believe that glacial cycles are the sole
source of global warming or cooling?

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -



Hey, Mike. The truth is inconvenient for Cecil.

John

On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 17:15:53 GMT, John - KD5YI
wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote:

I won't say that global warming is happening or not.



Of course, global warming is happening. It has been
going on for tens of thousands of years and happens
every time the earth cyclically emerges from an ice
age as it is doing now.



I'm speaking of CO2 based global warming, whether as the results of
say volcanic activity, or as a result of the amount of CO2 added to the
atmosphere as a result of combustion release.


May I assume that you believe that glacial cycles are the sole
source of global warming or cooling?

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -



Hey, Mike. The truth is inconvenient for Cecil.

Hi John,

Cecil's answer, like those of so many politicians, embraces a faulty
premise to dismiss discussion. Imagine those same administration
savants on the upcoming 5th anniversary asking for yet another board
of enquiry for a study into the possibility of WMD in Iraq. That
didn't happen, and yet we get this interminable "Global Warming isn't
so, and it isn't from ____" (fill in the blank with any of a number of
their favorite red herrings).

What's the difference between WMD and Global Warming? What caused the
rush to Iraq, but not to the melting glaciers? Wrap a side of bacon
around Global Warming and it would be covered with Republicans like
flies on their favorite nourishment. ...perhaps if the Eskimos had
gotten to Jack Abramoff first instead of the casino Indians....

Hmmm, a thought occurred, and a little research reveals some
interesting metrics. Oil at Nymex Crude Future is at $69.19/barrel
and Evian (Mineral water from the Alps) is running for $1.69/pint.
Simple conversion reveals Evian outdistances Oil at $743.60/barrel.
Obviously I was wrong about the bacon, Global Warming has
Chateâubriand wrapped around it. I'm surprised the Pentagon hasn't
got F-35's backed up to the glaciers with their after-burners going
24/7/365. Oil-for-water! And a conversion rate that beats taking
graft for a living.

Next week, how Creation Science will have our cars running on water to
wean us from terrorist oil.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 17:15:53 GMT, John - KD5YI
wrote:


Mike Coslo wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:


Mike Coslo wrote:


I won't say that global warming is happening or not.



Of course, global warming is happening. It has been
going on for tens of thousands of years and happens
every time the earth cyclically emerges from an ice
age as it is doing now.



I'm speaking of CO2 based global warming, whether as the results of
say volcanic activity, or as a result of the amount of CO2 added to the
atmosphere as a result of combustion release.


May I assume that you believe that glacial cycles are the sole
source of global warming or cooling?

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -



Hey, Mike. The truth is inconvenient for Cecil.


Hi John,

Cecil's answer, like those of so many politicians, embraces a faulty
premise to dismiss discussion. Imagine those same administration
savants on the upcoming 5th anniversary asking for yet another board
of enquiry for a study into the possibility of WMD in Iraq. That
didn't happen, and yet we get this interminable "Global Warming isn't
so, and it isn't from ____" (fill in the blank with any of a number of
their favorite red herrings).

And when it is finally incontrovertible, we'll have moans of
"we just didn't know at the time!"

I only hope I live long enough to see how they figure out a way to
blame it on the leeburulls!


Next week, how Creation Science will have our cars running on water to
wean us from terrorist oil.


If you have enough faith, manna, oops.. I mean fuel, will appear each
morning in your Escalade... ;^)


- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -

On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 22:08:58 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:

I only hope I live long enough to see how they figure out a way to
blame it on the leeburulls!

Hi Mike,

You only have to wait a couple of years for the Republicans to blame
Clinton (her or him, take your pick) for W.

It'll take them a lot longer to come to terms that the Neocon agenda
was an eagerly embraced legacy of Trotskyite commies from New York. If
Republicans can't understand politics, they certainly can't be expect
to understand science.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 22:08:58 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:


I only hope I live long enough to see how they figure out a way to
blame it on the leeburulls!


Hi Mike,

You only have to wait a couple of years for the Republicans to blame
Clinton (her or him, take your pick) for W.

It'll take them a lot longer to come to terms that the Neocon agenda
was an eagerly embraced legacy of Trotskyite commies from New York.

As a woman acquaintance who refuses to recycle anything because "It
will just encourage the liberals", inadvertently pointed out to me,
they'll be against anything the Demoncrats are for. Kinda fell into a
trap they did... Have to find out what the leeburullls believe so that
they can not believe it.


If
Republicans can't understand politics, they certainly can't be expect
to understand science.

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -

John - KD5YI wrote:
Hey, Mike. The truth is inconvenient for Cecil.

Here's the inconvenient truth:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_age

The same thing has happened five times in the past
500,000 years including a few hundred thousand years
before man ever walked the earth. Who caused the
last four global warming cycles?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 18:04:39 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Who caused the last four global warming cycles?

Who is on first, What's on second, I Don't Know's on third.

Cecil Moore wrote:
Here's the inconvenient truth:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_age

Here more from "21st Century Science and Technology"

http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.co...al_warming.pdf
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp