Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 23 Jan, 18:54, John Smith I wrote: art wrote: Odldy enough Jim I found out all about this by accident some years ago and tho I proved what I was seeing was correct the hardest part was why snip We may be two of the three blind men who went to see the elephant. I know for a fact the spinning of the earth (time) has no place it our equation on radio frequency vibrations. Why would you say that? Lets look at a rain drop accellerating towards ground until it comes to a sudden stop. Now look at this senario in terms of the big picture and we note that relatively speaking the droplet does not follow a straight line relative to a particular point on the face on the earth because of the earths rotation. So with the accellaration towards earth by gravity is a relative change in time it needs an accompanaying vector to qualify as curl which is supplied by the earths rotation. Thus I would contend that a droplet in free fall is statically loaded and provided with a time varying change at the same time. Thus the noise I heard with the antenna inside the car while in the rain forest was actually something that was transmitted as opposed to a static discharge on impact!. If you read about space transmissions you will note that they always place the word static within " ".. Why do you think they do that? An answer to that would be very interesting in light of what I infere early in this post would it not? Art However, I do accept the possibility of a "universal time frame" which does--but, someone SHOW it to me first!--universal time frame. I do accept that the "mysterious 377 ohms" seems to "work" in our equations. However, I do NOT believe it is "real", but I do believe it is acting as a "mysterious placeholder" for something unknown, unseen and undiscovered by us ... and, I do not know what this is. Well the 377 represents ether the impedance in space or ether the relative impedance in space. Ether way it works out O.K. and the math is made to prove it afrter the fact. it is ether that or something else Art So, in the end, I am viewed as a kook--just like you. I have a clone? But, with what you have described, it only leaves me with me with more questions--at least at the present time ... I am patient, perhaps one day you find the right words and I will have a revelation ... Did you try changing the angle of a vertical dipole to obtain some observables? How can you sleep? Art Regards, JS- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|