Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Highland Ham wrote in
: Try transmitting up and down the band to see where your lowest swr is. Then you can shorten or lengthen the antenna a bit to get a low swr in the 28.4 mhz range. If you can't quite get it to 1:1, coiling the coax at the feedpoint, 4 or 5 turns about 6 inches in diameter can get you pretty close to 1:1. 2:1 isn't bad, but you're probably not getting full power output if your rig is solid state. ================================= When SWR is 2:1 the reflected power is only 11% of the tx output power, which will hardly be noticeable at the receiving end . Even when SWR would be 3:1 only 25% of the transmitter power would be reflected , still resulting in only a fraction of an S-point at the receiving end. But a low SWR will make the solid state PA of your radio feel happier ! Frank, your analysis ignores the fact that the PA may deliver other than its rated power into the actual load, it could be higher or lower power, but in radios that incorporate VSWR protection of the PA, it is most likely to be lower, and at 3:1, substantially lower. VSWR protection helps protect radios operated by operators with the view that 'anything works'. To me, 2:1 seems a bit poor for such a simple antenna and probably readily capable of improvement to 1.5:1 or better. More importantly, the OP might expand their knowledge in the process. The original description was scant on information about the configuration, and I guess that sometimes, knowing how to describe the configuration / problem is the first step of knowing how to solve it. Others have identified missing elements of the description, the use or otherwise of a balun is relevant in indicating the extent to which common mode feed line current plays a part in determining the load presented to the feedline. Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
who is that guy reading at 476 MHZ ?? | Scanner | |||
Reading SWR with low power | Antenna | |||
Interesting reading from NCI | Policy | |||
Good reading: | CB |