On Dec 28, 1:42*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Art Unwin" wrote in message

...

you are building an auguement on sand like "have you stopped beating
your wife?"

well, have you?

You can traverse the world with a steel antenna using less than a watt
with the same message
as a Kw from a huge antenna. The only difference is that one system
provides less samples
of communication for the ear bone requires to decifer.

now this i must hear... how do you get from steel antennas to samples in the
ear bone? *is my ear bone a digital sampler now? *does it somehow sample
your magical levitating diamagnetic neutrinos straight out of the aether?
There must be more to this radio stuff than meets the eye if the ear is
involved now! *how does that work for transmitting video, does it change how
the eye bone works also?

I have never disliked the Yagi antenna but I refuse to belief that the
gains enjoyed are absolute because they ignore
the implications of the weak force or eddy currents.

you better believe they ignore the weak farce, that is all in your head.

As a talking head there is no need for you to understand the nuances
of science.
You, like Richard have survived most of your life on unproven data so
I can understand your need to question
whether there is a need for the corrected data that science provides.
This echoes the statement for removing the patent office as "all
possible discoveries have been realized"
Remember what I told you in the past. Free speech is O.K. but the
downside is that it also shows who and what manner of man you actually
are.
From my viewpoint what you have stated so far has only reduced your
credability with respect to radiation and increased the assumption
that you are nothing but a talking head, a trail you started years ago
when denying the feasability of introducing static law with those of
Maxwell where your basis was again just words without scientific
backing.
Art