| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:15:04 +0100, "Andy"
wrote: Thanks all, for your input. I'll stick it up on the mast this weekend and try it without any ground plain legs to start with. It will look a lot tidier without legs on and I won't have the problem of having to put up a longer stub mast to accommodate the ground plain legs. 73 Hi Andy, While the question of radials hinged on the match, sloping radials raising the resistance; what you propose may raise it further yet. The radials serve a purpose. If you remove them, you need to replace their function by some other means. This isn't bad, but it needs to be recognized and anticipated. Basically you are moving towards a vertical dipole (albeit with one leg at 5/8ths length). Even more, the lower leg will probably be driven into ground (not the normal convention for vertical dipoles). Even more, more, there is the drive line. It will contribute its own variation to the drivepoint impedance unless you have it properly choked. The long and short of it, is that it may take some experimentation for the right length of the supporting mast if you tie off the drive point to it (instead of simply using if for support). If you don't choke the feedpoint, then your coax will become part of the tuned system. This is not bad (unless it gets back into your equipment in the shack, or in the house in general), but it will introduced a hard to control variability. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Solarcon A99 | Antenna | |||
| Solarcon A-99 antenna | Antenna | |||
| Solarcon I-Max 2000 | Antenna | |||
| SOLARCON ANTRON 99 | CB | |||