Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Al, where can I get that piece here in Europe??
How about the different Frequency range for our Region? 144-146 and 430 - 440? 73 de OE8SOQ Helmut "Arrow146" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... | Subject: To those that said it would not work | From: | Date: 17, Thursday June, 2004 8:22 PM | Message-id: | Hi Al, | | I have two. They do work and their performance is no different than | and other end fed halfwave, as expected and as modeled. Also side by | side with monoband plumber specials(1/2 cu pipe designs) it is a | match, as in no difference. One I use for semiportable ops as it's | dual band and easy to mount up on a portable tripod and 15ft of | masting. | | Allison KB1gmx | | On 17 Jun 2004 16:43:05 GMT, (Arrow146) wrote: | As long a the copper pipe one is made correctly and has a choke | to cut down on common mode currents. And if the connections are | good, etc. And you don't mind the narrow band width. | | Your right, a 1/2 wave is a 1/2 is a 1/2 wave. All have 0 dBd. | | 73 Al Lowe N0IMW | ArrowAntenna.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Al -
Your antenna is excellent in every way. I have two of them that I'm thrilled with. And after our local ARES/RACES group saw mine, they ordered ten more for other members of the group. I confess to smiling a bit when I found out that my J146/440 at 20 feet is about 6 dB stronger into the local repeater than our EOC station's Comet "gain" antenna at 50 feet. (Obviously, this cannot be a direct A/B comparison; but both stations have a clear shot to the repeater, and they are closer to it than I am.) Don't let the nattering nabobs of negativism in this NG get you down. Many of them are so stuck in their ways, I'm surprised they haven't reprised their stock answer of "use ladder line and a tuner to feed a 135 foot dipole" as the hot ticket for 146/440 coverage. ;-) 73, Ed "Arrow146" wrote in message ... Remember back when some said my Open Stub J-pole (OSJ) design Would not work very well. Just take a look at 25 reviews at A HREF="http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/1613"eHam.net Reviews - OSJ Model J146/440/A or http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/1613 See if you can find the ONE review that did not give it a 5 out of 5 rating. Changing the way J-Poles are made, "Simply the Best" 73 Al Lowe N0IMW ArrowAntenna.com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My only problem with J antennas is WHY. I can more easily build a 5/8.
What your really asking is why a half wave vs a 5/8ths? The best answer I can give is a 5/8ths REQUIRES a groundplane to work at all correctly and that makes it more metal and complication. Yes the 5/8ths offers _some_ additional gain but for simplicity the end fed dipoles (all the J varients) do not require a ground plane and are more compact in general shape making them a better candiate for steath or portable ops. Seriously if I were going for more gain than the OSJ the antenna would be a 4 bay dipole for the same reasons. Rugged, simple, excellent gain and good radiation pattern. The 5/8ths does not offer enough gain increase to make it worth the effort when a 5.6db colinear or 4 bay dipole offers significantly more. Allison KB!GMX Wow, Good Answer, I totally agree. I tested several different 5/8 wave antenna, I even made a prototype that worked as well or better than any of them, and looked better. But comparing them to the OSJ it was hard to tell the difference, maybe a 1/2 "S" Unit in favor of the 5/8 wave. With the difference in cost to make, (Labor & Material) it just did not see worth the effort to me. 73 Al Lowe N0IMW A HREF="http://ArrowAntennas.com"ArrowAntenna.com/A |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Should this design work? | Antenna | |||
How do aluminum pipe sizes work? | Antenna | |||
R/S Solderless BNC Connectors: How Can They Possibly Work Well ? | Antenna | |||
How does the rainbow tuner work? | Antenna | |||
Will my G5RV work in a this V shape | Antenna |