On Friday, October 17, 2014 6:20:46 AM UTC-5, gareth wrote:
What was that you were saying, about starting threads as an excuse

to become abusive?

Why are you trashing up r.r.a.a. with this silly Peyton Place crap?
No one on r.r.a.a. is interested in your silly social issues.

For many years this group has been fairly free of usenet silliness,
and has only been used for antenna related discussion.
Keep that silly UK crap over there, and don't cross post it here,
if you please. I think I can speak for many who will tell you,
we don't want it here. At all.

Talk about obtuse antenna theories is OK, even if irregular. :/
This whiny UK Peyton Place crap most certainly is not.

wrote in message
...
Why are you trashing up r.r.a.a. with this silly Peyton Place crap?
No one on r.r.a.a. is interested in your silly social issues.
For many years this group has been fairly free of usenet silliness,
and has only been used for antenna related discussion.
Keep that silly UK crap over there, and don't cross post it here,
if you please. I think I can speak for many who will tell you,
we don't want it here. At all.
Talk about obtuse antenna theories is OK, even if irregular. :/
This whiny UK Peyton Place crap most certainly is not.

Physician, heal thyself, and in so doing, please address your remarks
to the originators of abusive material, yourself included, as above.

wrote in news:0508d35c-4701-45fe-a005-
:

Keep that silly UK crap over there

I hope you don't think it's representative of the UK. Well, I certainly
hope it isn't. I live here...

Brian Reay wrote in news:1923299660435308016.369759no.sp-
:

If everyone ignores him

You too? I wrote yesterday, of a problem with a neighbour, a problem not too
disimilar to your own with Gareth. Why not draw a firebreak and leave it at
that. He'll try to cross it, but so long as you don't, he can't do a lot. I
understand you have a particular greivance, but I think you're making a
mistake in allowing it to maintain its shape. Let it go. It might takes
years, but it will break up, somehow. Life abhors a vacuum, so make one and
let life fill it with what it will. Most things are better than prolonging
what looks to me like a feud. I'll tell you one thing mo That neighbour of
mine seemes releived every time we meet, that the bad past does NOT have to
recur! He lives next door, so I don't have the luxury of easily escaping him,
or repeatedly pointing out his state from a distance protected by a court's
restraining order. Sometimes we have to try to fox these things ourselves,
and just doing nothing is as good a way as any, we soon think of other things
to do.

Just trying to stop this as best I can. This IS my best shot. If it fails
I'll say no more. If it works, I'll say no more. I won't take any credit
either way, that would be due to you both if you make it work.

"Lostgallifreyan" wrote in message
. ..
Brian Reay wrote in news:1923299660435308016.369759no.sp-
:

If everyone ignores him

You too? I wrote yesterday, of a problem with a neighbour, a problem not
too
disimilar to your own with Gareth.

You know nothing about me, a Mongolian Horde of abusive ne'er-do-wells being
a bad source of evidence.

"gareth" wrote in news:m1ta9i$9lq$1@dont-
email.me:

You know nothing about me...

I know this: you're both in a prolonged feud that has had officially recorded
consequences. Ask yourselves, how long do you have left? Do you want to end
your days like this?

"Lostgallifreyan" wrote in message
. ..
"gareth" wrote in news:m1ta9i$9lq$1@dont-
email.me:

You know nothing about me...

I know this: you're both in a prolonged feud that has had officially
recorded
consequences. Ask yourselves, how long do you have left? Do you want to
end
your days like this?

I am not in a feud. The assault by reay is an on-going indication of his
social
dysfunction to which I have only ever responded in indignant defence.

It was Reay who out-of- the-blue originated abusive remarks in this NG

As always, whether it is reay, or whether it is you, or whether John S or
jimp, I take to task those
who disrupt amateur radio discussions by infantile outbursts of personal
remarks.

On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 03:00:46 -0500, Lostgallifreyan wrote:

Why not draw a firebreak and leave it at that. He'll try to cross it,
but so long as you don't, he can't do a lot.

It's been suggested countless times to both of them. The Trouble is that
they, and a few others in ukra, are negatively obsessed with each other.
I assume that at some point there will b a natural ending, although I
expect the last man standing will start trolling himself!

In the meantime, they are best ignored.



Charlie.


--
M0WYM
Sales @ radiowymsey
http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Sales-At-Radio-Wymsey/

On 18/10/14 12:35, Wymsey wrote:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 03:00:46 -0500, Lostgallifreyan wrote:

Why not draw a firebreak and leave it at that. He'll try to cross it,
but so long as you don't, he can't do a lot.

It's been suggested countless times to both of them. The Trouble is that
they, and a few others in ukra, are negatively obsessed with each other.
I assume that at some point there will b a natural ending, although I
expect the last man standing will start trolling himself!

In the meantime, they are best ignored.



Charlie.



Ah, Charlie, one of the chief stirrers joins in. How strange.

No wonder Evans continues with you supporting him.

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
Ah, Charlie, one of the chief stirrers joins in. How strange.
No wonder Evans continues with you supporting him.

Once again, Brian, it is you and you alone who origininates
completely unnecessary personal abuse, and by doing so,
continue your one-sided vendetta against me.