Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks gents
Great, thanks for all your thoughts. I wanted to stay away from the battery bank thing, I have enough trouble with keeping 4 or 5 deep cycles alive for more than 5 or 6 years. But I may introduce them to a PV system. But all my Deep Cycles are different sizes, so sure would like some of those Tesla by Elon. I believe that person is developing a huge PV manufacturing facility in Buffalo NY but I talked to SolarCity reps and they will not deal with Canadian market. My program is with Ontario Hydro and up north our local providers are shaky and unreliable. In Ontario Canada the provincial govt is recently (last decade or more) really screwed things up, they started a Gas Power Plant and cancelled that after about a billion, they have had other programs that they started and abruptly ended after loosing a few billion and now they are in a 50 year debt and trying to sell off to private (fire sale) and they are offering this program to me for a 20 year contract. So I must install 40 panels on my roof and tie it all into the grid and they want 100% of it and paying a pretty nice penny per KWh. But the initial investment by me is substantial up front so if they pull out of the deal in one year then I have a very big expensive inverters that are good for nothing. A lot of people in Ontario Canada don't think that the local Ontary Hydro will be long for this world, so we don't want to get stuck on this program and left hanging. I can see them keeping me (and all home owners or cottage owners) as providers because we aren't unionized and costing more to produce it than selling it, I think they are trying to eliminate the nuclear (60% of our power in Ontario) because it is costing too much debt. So their goal may be to get all that can to provide it because I maintain the house structure and panel system and no union or salary or coffee breaks. But they could cancel that tomorrow leaving me a $30,000 system I can do nothing with. I like what they are offering, it seems too good to be true. I will take a chance, role the dice and jump in. For the program. Without the program it isn't worth it at this time. Thanks very much for all the food for thought, I will implement a small charge controller and small battery bank system. I like your Diesel Generator idea for if ever the power does go out, which it does. But it is small to worry about. Thanks again for all the ideas. For my primary reason for this system, I will buy the 40 panels and do you folks have any reasons why you would select the Solaredge technology with the new optimizers for efficiencies (about $3000.00) for their product, or using Enphase microinverters (about $7000.00). Other than costs difference, which would you folks prefer? Both become useless if the power grid goes off, but both are looking pretty equal for efficiences and installation is easy enough. All the surfing and reading I see is everyone has installed the Solaredge and it seems to have improved nicely, while the Enphase is the lastest and not really had many years of use to compare, but they apparently to some are the better device. Do you folks have any comments on either of these devices? Have good day, thanks "Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message ... On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:14:46 -0400, "Tom" wrote: Can you comment on the fact that these Enphase converters need 240ac volts (grid connection) to run? This means that if ever the power supplier locally ever shuts down for more than a long period of time that these Enphase units become useless. Around my neck of the woods we are getting more and more power outages lasting longer and longer. These inverters require being connected to the grid to function. Yep, been there. Almost everyone that has a grid tied solar system wants to know what it will take to make it run when the power is down. Home Power Magazine had a nice article on the topic in the current issue (168): http://www.homepower.com/articles/solar-electricity/design-installation/adding-battery-backup-your-pv-system-ac-coupling The magic buzzword for Googling is "AC-Coupled Battery Backup PV System" (or something like that). Note that there are both DC and AC coupled approaches to the problem, each with their own advantages and problems. Note that Elon Musk wants to do much the same thing but not to backup your solar PV system. He wants to store excess power in a battery bank, and return it during times of peak loads to save money using time of use billing. http://www.wired.com/2015/05/teslas-batteries-will-power-home/ I understand the safety requirement and it needing to do this to be certified but it really limits the home owner (or cottage owner in my case). Yep. All of the stuff in the article is probably approved, but I would be careful and check, especially with made in China hardware purchased on eBay. Have you ever worked on a system that was more practical? More practical than what? I've done nothing with AC coupled backup systems for grid tied PV systems, mostly because none of my customers will tolerate the cost. It's often cheaper to just buy a big generator and let it sit around until it's needed. Diesel seems to be the favorite. That qualified for the grid program but was useful when detached from the grid? Seems to me if ever the power company decides to cancel the program you may be stuck with 40 inverters that are useless and are 200 dollars each. You're mixing up a bunch of programs. First, your power company is unlikely to pull the plug except for non-payment. It might decide to cancel subsidies or refuse to offer net metering payments, as happens in many states. In California, if the power is lost for extended periods, there is some fixed amount that the power companies are required to refund the customer on their next bill. That too might be terminated. At this time, power generation and distribution is mostly a "best effort" exercise, with little in the way of guarantees covering extended outages. If you're dependent on a sole source of power, such as utility *OR* PV, then you'll have the same problem with outages. My best suggestions is to have more than one source of power. Utility and PV are the most common. There's also wind and micro-hydro generation. Batteries don't generate electricity so they're not considered an alternative power source. Once you have your power source in place, then you can think about storage options. Any comments are thankful, If you wanted to be off the grid, then kindly plan your system for off grid use. That mostly eliminates grid tied systems and always requires batteries or other forms of energy storage (maybe flywheel). Instead of micro-inverters, you're back to the big charger/controller boxes, and banks of batteries. Batteries are always a problem. They require constant care. They tend to die rather quickly. They're expensive. They're big, ugly, and dangerous. They're far too easy to kill. Before dealing with batteries, make sure you know what you're getting into. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Need Info: Pure Sine Wave Inverters and Radio Noise | Equipment | |||
micro--waves | Antenna | |||
Inverters | Swap | |||
New micro TNC, anyone got one? | Digital | |||
New micro TNC, anyone got one? | Digital |