Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark wrote:
"Is this practical?" Trees near an antenna cause some loss. It`s hard to quantify in advance, but in ww-2, the signal corps estimated that hf loss is usually negligible if horizontal polarization is used (page 241 of 'electrical communications engineering'). I`ve found that horizontal HF dipoles, directly fed by coax in various Bolivian Chaco Jungle sites, below the the tree canopy, but not too close to the trees, communicated well with Cochabamba and La Paz, Bolivia. So, the dipoles didn`t suffer too much from the trees. The Signal Corps was right. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
FS: Larsen KD150HW 2 meter half wave for handheld | Antenna | |||
vertical dipole? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |