LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
Old September 20th 04, 06:52 AM
Richard Harrison
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark wrote:
"Is this practical?"

Trees near an antenna cause some loss. It`s hard to quantify in advance,
but in ww-2, the signal corps estimated that hf loss is usually
negligible if horizontal polarization is used (page 241 of 'electrical
communications engineering').

I`ve found that horizontal HF dipoles, directly fed by coax in various
Bolivian Chaco Jungle sites, below the the tree canopy, but not too
close to the trees, communicated well with Cochabamba and La Paz,
Bolivia. So, the dipoles didn`t suffer too much from the trees. The
Signal Corps was right.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
FS: Larsen KD150HW 2 meter half wave for handheld Homer Antenna 0 April 7th 04 01:06 AM
vertical dipole? Desmoface Antenna 25 January 16th 04 12:20 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017