Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In , (Twistedhed) wrote: snip Using the "F" word is not taking the lord's name in vain. _ Interesting topic, this "taking the lord's name in vain" issue. I have heard lots of holy-rollers whine and cry when someone says "god damn". But what really is god's name? Doesn't the bible say that god's name is unknowable? Like, when Moses asked god for his name, all he got was, "I am". So if nobody knows the name of god, how can anybody use it in vain? _ By intentionally referring to the almighty..the term a mortal applies is irrelevant. _ You're a bible-thumper, Twist -- what do you think? I think some are in a sad state concerning God. Those who obviously are in dire need of spiritual direction and refer to one who believes in the God of Abraham as a "Bible-thumper",,,continue to produce the most inaccurate posts regarding anything to date. _ -----=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =3D----- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Frank*Gilliland) In , (Twistedhed) wrote: snip Using the "F" word is not taking the lord's name in vain. _ Interesting topic, this "taking the lord's name in vain" issue. I have heard lots of holy-rollers whine and cry when someone says "god damn". But what really is god's name? Doesn't the bible say that god's name is unknowable? Like, when Moses asked god for his name, all he got was, "I am". So if nobody knows the name of god, how can anybody use it in vain? _ By intentionally referring to the almighty..the term a mortal applies is irrelevant. Your statement presupposes monotheism. _ You're a bible-thumper, Twist -- what do you think? I think some are in a sad state concerning God. Your response was just like I would expect from a bible-thumper.... you can't accept the reality that the religious and/or spiritual 'state' of anyone else is none of your concern. Nor is it your place to judge others based on the precepts of your own personal beliefs, especially when you fail to live according to those precepts...... remember your version of the "Golden Rule", Twist? Those who obviously are in dire need of spiritual direction and refer to one who believes in the God of Abraham as a "Bible-thumper",,,continue to produce the most inaccurate posts regarding anything to date. Those who are overwhelmed by the realities of science and logic usually abandon them in favor of the simplicity of religion. Those who are incapable of accepting the responsibilities of their own actions seek adjudication from a 'higher power'. And, according to my visiting grand-nephew, "You go to church when nobody likes you because the Bible says people who go to church -have- to like you," which mirrors the observations made throughout history that religions thrive on social rejects. Pretty god damn sharp for a 6 year old! -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In , (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Frank=A0Gilliland) In , (Twistedhed) wrote: snip Using the "F" word is not taking the lord's name in vain. _ Interesting topic, this "taking the lord's name in vain" issue. I have heard lots of holy-rollers whine and cry when someone says "god damn". But what really is god's name? Doesn't the bible say that god's name is unknowable? Like, when Moses asked god for his name, all he got was, "I am". So if nobody knows the name of god, how can anybody use it in vain? _ =A0=A0By intentionally referring to the almighty..the term a mortal applies is irrelevant. _ Your statement presupposes monotheism. How so? Your interpretive skills are acting up again. You are reading what isn't there. _ You're a bible-thumper, Twist -- what do you think? I think some are in a sad state concerning God. Your response was just like I would expect from a bible-thumper.... you can't accept the reality that the religious and/or spiritual 'state' of anyone else is none of your concern. _ Agreed, You inquired of my "state", and opinion, which makes it your overt concern. _ Nor is it your place to judge others based on the precepts of your own personal beliefs, I don't judge upon my belief. In fact, google "benefit of the doubt" and you will find in many of my posts, that I alway give the benefit of doubt to folks. I am too trusting. _ especially when you fail to live according to those precepts..... Any "precepts" are of *your* inclusion and always manufactured, just like your inquiry of my beliefs and opinions concerning religion, your communication deficits have you misinterpreting the reality of the situation. _ . remember your version of the "Golden Rule", Twist? Yes, I do, Frank, however, I do not believe that cursing and making you my topic will resolve your misfortune and maladies. Of course, telling anyone who will listen about your multi-year obsessions concerning an internet personality gives me much satisfaction. I'm not the one who needs return your awkward, abusive, angry, childlike behaviors in order to feel a temporary betterment of myself. You have the corner and patent on such behaviors, Frank. _ Those who obviously are in dire need of spiritual direction and refer to one who believes in the God of Abraham as a "Bible-thumper",,,continue to produce the most inaccurate posts regarding anything to date. Those who are overwhelmed by the realities of science and logic usually abandon them in favor of the simplicity of religion. _ Those who suffer comprehension and interpretive problems are unaware that evolution is not an exact science, but a theory...provide the missing link, something that has been tried repeatedly and met with accute failure (something you are quite familiar with), and then you can destroy religion. Until then, you are no more educated than the religious observer..as we both have "blind faith" in our beliefs. You, despite the lack of hard evidence, assume enough is present to sustain your non-deity (except myself) belief. Religious observers believe your lack of evidence concerning evolution, coupled with their own personal dogmas, backgrounds, experiences and beliefs, is enough to believe the opposite of you. Until you understand that slamming another for their beliefs, such as you are attempting now with your personal insult falsely accusing moi of "accepting reality" when in fact, you offer nothing more than anohter spectacular belief. Minds are like books and function only when open. _ Those who are incapable of accepting the responsibilities of their own actions seek adjudication from a 'higher power'. _ Adjudication? Do you mean "abdication", as in abdication of sins? Your brush is getting wide again, and your canine teeth are showing your discontent and contempt for christianity. _ And, according to my visiting grand-nephew, "You go to church when nobody likes you because the Bible says people who go to church -have- to like you," _ I'm not surprised. If he is related to you, it is of little wonder that he is already Twisted. I didn't think you would pass me down through your generations, Frank. _ which mirrors the observations made throughout history that religions thrive on social rejects. Pretty god damn sharp for a 6 year old! The rejects are the ones that need attack others beliefs, as you so adepty illustrated your willingness to do such. And to correct your bull****, the bible says " Build not churches to worship me, but come to me directly through the Son." Church is a frame of mind, not a physical structure. You will never comprehend such things, Frank,,one needs faith,,all you have is darkness, dilemmas, and unhealthy obsessions. -----=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =3D----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----=3D=3D |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Frank*Gilliland) In , (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Frank*Gilliland) In , (Twistedhed) wrote: snip Using the "F" word is not taking the lord's name in vain. _ Interesting topic, this "taking the lord's name in vain" issue. I have heard lots of holy-rollers whine and cry when someone says "god damn". But what really is god's name? Doesn't the bible say that god's name is unknowable? Like, when Moses asked god for his name, all he got was, "I am". So if nobody knows the name of god, how can anybody use it in vain? _ **By intentionally referring to the almighty..the term a mortal applies is irrelevant. _ Your statement presupposes monotheism. How so? Your interpretive skills are acting up again. You are reading what isn't there. I already gave you a lesson in prepositional phrases -- do I also need to educate you in the difference between singular and plural? _ You're a bible-thumper, Twist -- what do you think? I think some are in a sad state concerning God. Your response was just like I would expect from a bible-thumper.... you can't accept the reality that the religious and/or spiritual 'state' of anyone else is none of your concern. _ Agreed, You inquired of my "state", and opinion, which makes it your overt concern. I asked for your opinion. I did not inquire of your "state". Your interpretive skills are acting up again. You are reading what isn't there. _ Nor is it your place to judge others based on the precepts of your own personal beliefs, I don't judge upon my belief. In fact, google "benefit of the doubt" and you will find in many of my posts, that I alway give the benefit of doubt to folks. I am too trusting. ROTFLMMFAO!!!!! _ especially when you fail to live according to those precepts..... Any "precepts" are of *your* inclusion and always manufactured, just like your inquiry of my beliefs and opinions concerning religion, your communication deficits have you misinterpreting the reality of the situation. _ . remember your version of the "Golden Rule", Twist? Yes, I do, Frank, however, I do not believe that cursing and making you my topic will resolve your misfortune and maladies. Of course, telling anyone who will listen about your multi-year obsessions concerning an internet personality gives me much satisfaction. I'm not the one who needs return your awkward, abusive, angry, childlike behaviors in order to feel a temporary betterment of myself. You have the corner and patent on such behaviors, Frank. .....uh huh.... and that's why you have accused me of everything under the sun, including child molestation and alcohol abuse, right? Now according to the Golden Rule (the -real- one, not your twisted version), you should treat others the way you want to be treated. So did you make those accusations and forgeries because you really want me to accuse you of such horrendous behavior and forge your posts? Well, guess what, Twisty, I have been one step above that all this time and have done nothing of the sort. Others have, too be sure, but according to your version of the Golden Rule, you asked for it! And here's another lesson to discuss at your next church group: Just because someone treats you poorly, the -real- Golden Rule doesn't justify poor behavior in return. Quite the contrary -- see the "Turn the other cheek" rule. Or maybe your bible study class hasn't gotten that far yet..... _ Those who obviously are in dire need of spiritual direction and refer to one who believes in the God of Abraham as a "Bible-thumper",,,continue to produce the most inaccurate posts regarding anything to date. Those who are overwhelmed by the realities of science and logic usually abandon them in favor of the simplicity of religion. _ Those who suffer comprehension and interpretive problems are unaware that evolution is not an exact science, but a theory...provide the missing link, something that has been tried repeatedly and met with accute failure (something you are quite familiar with), and then you can destroy religion. Until then, you are no more educated than the religious observer..as we both have "blind faith" in our beliefs. You, despite the lack of hard evidence, assume enough is present to sustain your non-deity (except myself) belief. Religious observers believe your lack of evidence concerning evolution, coupled with their own personal dogmas, backgrounds, experiences and beliefs, is enough to believe the opposite of you. Until you understand that slamming another for their beliefs, such as you are attempting now with your personal insult falsely accusing moi of "accepting reality" when in fact, you offer nothing more than anohter spectacular belief. Minds are like books and function only when open. Your lack of understanding is demonstrated by your ignorance of the differences between inductive and deductive logic, both of which constitute the foundation of science. The evidence supporting evolution is overwhelming, especially when compared to the total lack of proof (gee, what a suprise) offered by the crowd that thinks the universe was willed into existence in six days by some supreme being, a concept which is laughable if you were capable of looking at things objectively, which you aren't (gee, another suprise). This is the 21st century, Twist; yet you, like so many others, choose to practice mythology that has existed since before the dark ages. The funny thing is that while you profess a belief that directly contradicts both science and logic, you hypocritically embrace the latter concepts as they suit you, and irrespective of your 'belief'. _ Those who are incapable of accepting the responsibilities of their own actions seek adjudication from a 'higher power'. _ Adjudication? Do you mean "abdication", as in abdication of sins? Your brush is getting wide again, and your canine teeth are showing your discontent and contempt for christianity. I meant 'adjudication', just like I said. And you really need to learn the definitions of the words you use -- sins are not subject to "abdication". _ And, according to my visiting grand-nephew, "You go to church when nobody likes you because the Bible says people who go to church -have- to like you," _ I'm not surprised. If he is related to you, it is of little wonder that he is already Twisted. Not "twisted", Twisty. Just observant. I didn't think you would pass me down through your generations, Frank. No need for you to start thinking now, Twisty. _ which mirrors the observations made throughout history that religions thrive on social rejects. Pretty god damn sharp for a 6 year old! The rejects are the ones that need attack others beliefs, as you so adepty illustrated your willingness to do such. I don't attack the true spritual beliefs of others -- I attack hypocrites like you who hide behind the veil of religion, much like you hide behind your alias in this newsgroup. And to correct your bull****, the bible says " Build not churches to worship me, but come to me directly through the Son." Church is a frame of mind, not a physical structure. You will never comprehend such things, Frank,,one needs faith,,all you have is darkness, dilemmas, and unhealthy obsessions. Right. Sure. Which no-code hammie do you think I am -this- week, Twisty? And what does the Bible say about lying? Bearing false witness? Stealing? Shooting mushroom-picking college kids? Strangely enough, I hope I'm wrong -- I hope there really is a god, because then you will have a lot of explaining to do come judgment day (and that's 'judgment', as in 'adjudicate') to someone that will see ALL your bull****. And if I'm there when you try and spin the "judge" with your misdirections, logical fallacies, pathetic justifications, misperceived conincidences and blatant lies, I'll laugh myself all the way to Hell! I can see it now..... God: "So what do you have to say for yourself?" Twisty: "....uh, HE said he was N7VCF!" God: "No he didn't." Twisty: "....well, he IMPLIED he was...." God: "No he didn't." Twisty: "...(sigh)...but he was so obsessed with that identity..." God: "No he wasn't, you were. In fact, it was you that suggested he was five different hams." Twisty: "And each one was justified!" God: "How so?" Twisty: "Well, he and Leland Scott both posted from Supernews...." God: "So did many others." Twisty: "But they both wrote the same kind of pro-legal dribble..." God: "So you reasoned that he was Leland Scott because you thought it was either impossible or highly unlikely that they could have been two different people?" Twisty: "Yes! And of course you know how everybody in the newsgroup had several different identities...." God: "No, not everybody. Only a few did, one of them being yourself." Twisty: "Well, ok. But that was before I discovered another newsgroup hammie by the name Glenn Sparks.... get it? Sparky? Sparks?" God: "....hmmm." Twisty: "But what about this: I looked up Sparky's name in the ham database and found N7VCF. I compared pictures on N7VCF's website and on Sparky's website, and guess what: They both had a beard! And N7VCF lived in Issaquah, and Sparky said he was from Issaquah...." God: "No he didn't." Twisty: "But he didn't deny it...." God: "Yes he did." Twisty: "Get over your communication deficit, God! N7VCF lived only 300 miles away from Sparky, and that was just too close to be a coincidence in a country of nearly half a billion people....." ............ ROTFL! -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In , (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Frank=A0Gilliland) In , (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Frank=A0Gilliland) , Using the "F" word is not taking the lord's name in vain. _ Interesting topic, this "taking the lord's name in vain" issue. Is that why you brought it up? You seem to think the topic is "interesting"? I have heard lots of holy-rollers whine and cry when someone says "god damn". But what really is god's name? Doesn't the bible say that god's name is unknowable? Like, when Moses asked god for his name, all he got was, "I am". So if nobody knows the name of god, how can anybody use it in vain? _ =A0=A0By intentionally referring to the almighty..the term a mortal applies is irrelevant. _ Your statement presupposes monotheism. How so? Your interpretive skills are acting up again. You are reading what isn't there. I already gave you a lesson in prepositional phrases -- Which was soundly trounced by shattering your common misconception that all Latin translates properly to English, when in fact, it does not. Insistence at remaining ignorant is your right. _ do I also need to educate you in the difference between singular and plural? If you knew what you needed from life, you wouldn't be holding on to the tail of mine. If life's lessons were learnable to you, you wouldn't repeat the same erroneous bumbles that you do. _ You're a bible-thumper, Twist -- what do you think? I think some are in a sad state concerning God. Your response was just like I would expect from a bible-thumper.... ...and yours from one who desperately needs faith in his life.Tis a sad man that inquires of a christian only to attempt condescension and insult, but then again, if God was in your life, you wouldn't be feeling as if you have no choice in your selection of me as your deity, Frank. _ you can't accept the reality that the religious and/or spiritual 'state' of anyone else is none of your concern. _ Agreed, You inquired of my "state", and opinion, which makes it your overt concern. _ I asked for your opinion. I did not inquire of your "state". _ Nor I of yours, but you somehow interpreted it as if I somehow made such a claim. Let's see it again....you said,,"you can't accept the reality that the religious and/or spiritual 'state' of anyone else is none of your concern." Again,,,*you* mentioned "state", not I. Your interpretive skills are acting up again. You are reading what isn't there and making claims and then attempting to misattribute them to myself. Signs of a pathetic, broken, desperate, and intimidated individual. You're washed up, Frank, to the point that you do not even remember what you lie about these days. _ Nor is it your place to judge others based on the precepts of your own personal beliefs, I don't judge upon my belief. In fact, google "benefit of the doubt" and you will find in many of my posts, that I alway give the benefit of doubt to folks. I am too trusting. ROTFLMMFAO!!!!! Watch the stains, I had a devil of a time getting them out of the carpet last time you acted this way. We here in rec,radio,cb prefer the carpet unstained. A little deodorizing and sanitization is all you need, but you can roll under the table with Cooter-Mae all you wish. Just watch ****ing on yourself, Frank. Others are always cleaning up after your mess. _ especially when you fail to live according to those precepts..... Any "precepts" are of *your* inclusion and always manufactured, just like your inquiry of my beliefs and opinions concerning religion, your communication deficits have you misinterpreting the reality of the situation. _ . remember your version of the "Golden Rule", Twist? Yes, I do, Frank, however, I do not believe that cursing and making you my topic will resolve your misfortune and maladies. Of course, telling anyone who will listen about your multi-year obsessions concerning an internet personality gives me much satisfaction. I'm not the one who needs return your awkward, abusive, angry, childlike behaviors in order to feel a temporary betterment of myself. You have the corner and patent on such behaviors, Frank. _ ....uh huh.... and that's why you have accused Oh, this is rich,,Frank trying to blame his juvenile behavior over the years on another,,,,,,,Of course! LOL! Its TWIST'S fault Frank has no grip on his life...LOL! me of everything under the sun, including child molestation Never happened, Frank, but it makes for good propaganda for your self-waged war and obsession, eh, Frank? LOL. and alcohol abuse, right? Oh no doubt..I definitely surmised you are an alcoholic. Your Jeckyll/Hyde syndrome gives you away every time when you are under some influence of a poison substance. You are beside yourself with the fact that you are so easy to pigeonhole...it's your own fault, despite you looking to me for blame of your misery. _ Now according to the Golden Rule (the -real- one, not your twisted version), Please illustrate with the post, this "version" you feel I hold of the Golden Rule,,,,,,,,,,,,you have my permission to post the post alongside the other nonexistent one you seem to think exists where I said you were a child molester. You can show such posts, can't you Frank? No, of course you can not,,,,as you are nothing but a trifling, overweight alcoholic that needs someone to blame for his misery. You done chased away the only good you ever had in your life through physical abuse,,see Frank,,this "crusade" you launched to find personal info on folks can backfire,,,,appears severla know your life story, Frank, only you continue to make trying to find such off-topics your personal task. ASk and ye shall receive. you should treat others the way you want to be treated. Which is exactly what I have claimed in the past and those words have sent you into spasms in the past,,LOL _ So did you make those accusations You need to get past your mistaken belief that I was part of any conspiracy accusing you of such things, Frank, only then will you gain the closure, or whatever it is you seek and beg of myself. _ and forgeries because you really want me to accuse you of such horrendous behavior and forge your posts? LOL,,you give yourself way too much credit, Frank. I see I now impose my will upon thee in your real life hours away from this group. You need some help, Frank,,whether it's AA, NA (from the alleged cocaine abuse), or whatever, but your paranoia is growing leaps and bounds, Frank. That you speak of a conversation that took place years ago, and incidentally feel it was I claiming you were a child molester, shows the great impact that person had upon twisting your psyche,,,they appear to have broke it. Once again, 'twas not I that let out what appears to be your deepest, darkest, secret, Frank. Recognize such. This horrendous "behavior" you speak of is illustrated quite nicely with your colorful insults and cursing peppered throughout your posting history. _ Well, guess what, Twisty, I have been one step above that all this time and have done nothing of the sort. Mutated paranoia..LOL. You ask me to "guess" a scenario then actually begin to believe your own conjured thoughts. No doubt about it, you're an addict. Your brain is mush,,,your body poison of choice is irrelevant. _ Others have, too be sure, Yet these others you claim to speak for (too (sic) be sure) have yet to materialize. You're ego is dragging again, Frank. but according to your version of the Golden Rule, you asked for it! _ If your claim of me accusing you of molestation were true, I would agree, however, it is but merely a lie on your desperate and pathetic behalf for reasons known only to your admitted obsession of me. Then again,your deficit may be responsible for your incredible buffoonery. _ And here's another lesson to discuss at your next church group: Just because someone treats you poorly, the -real- Golden Rule doesn't justify poor behavior in return. Quite the contrary -- see the "Turn the other cheek" rule. Or maybe your bible study class hasn't gotten that far yet..... We listen to those who walk the walk and are kind and helpful and willing, unlike you with your insults, intolerance of other's religious beliefs, lies, deliberate disinformation, juvenile gutter language and malicous condescension toward any who dare disagree with your jaded and warped views of the world and electronics. Jesus turns the other cheek. I'm not Jesus. I give better than I get, It's an inherent talent, one that you prove on a regular basis. _ Those who obviously are in dire need of spiritual direction and refer to one who believes in the God of Abraham as a "Bible-thumper",,,continue to produce the most inaccurate posts regarding anything to date. Those who are overwhelmed by the realities of science and logic usually abandon them in favor of the simplicity of religion. _ Those who suffer comprehension and interpretive problems are unaware that evolution is not an exact science, but a theory...provide the missing link, something that has been tried repeatedly and met with accute failure (something you are quite familiar with), and then you can destroy religion. Until then, you are no more educated than the religious observer..as we both have "blind faith" in our beliefs. You, despite the lack of hard evidence, assume enough is present to sustain your non-deity (except myself) belief. Religious observers believe your lack of evidence concerning evolution, coupled with their own personal dogmas, backgrounds, experiences and beliefs, is enough to believe the opposite of you. Until you understand that slamming another for their beliefs, such as you are attempting now with your personal insult falsely accusing moi of "accepting reality" when in fact, you offer nothing more than anohter spectacular belief. Minds are like books and function only when open. Your lack of understanding Thereis no lack of understanding on my behalf, merely more of your impotent claims. Your impotence and ignorance do not equate another misunderstanding, but once again, you nicely illustrate how you blame the rest of the world for your problems and dillemas. _ is demonstrated by your ignorance of the differences between inductive and deductive logic, both of which constitute the foundation of science. The evidence supporting evolution is overwhelming, especially when compared to the total lack of proof (gee, what a suprise) offered by the crowd that thinks the universe was willed into existence in six days by some supreme being, a concept which is laughable if you were capable of looking at things objectively, which you aren't (gee, another suprise). Depends on the subject. Holding to your attempted and presented logic, neither are you. You are predisposed to hate and no tolerance of another's religious belief. You are biased against those who refuse to acknowledge your way is the "right" way. World doesn't conform to you, Frank,,it's part of why you have such a difficult time in it. _ =A0=A0This is the 21st century, Twist; yet you, like so many others, choose to practice mythology that has existed since before the dark ages. You are speaking of your own examples, Frank,,,,like the dead language rule derived from Latin that you can't comprehend nor let go. This is the 21st century, Frank, yet you grasp to some ancient rule that doesnt apply, merely because your ego is so destroyed and you can't handle anymore bungles. I this instant, you should take a deep breath, and think about what you are going to type, as your uncontrollable anger towards myself has your fingers working ahead of your tiny brain...again. _ For every "fact" you can bring concerning evolution, it can be countered with another supporting Christianity. Your science is but a mere theory, something that others have illustrated your failure to recognize concerning real world applications when applied to electronic and radio theory. The funny thing is that while you profess a belief that directly contradicts both science Science doesn't prove your belief, Frank,,it's a theory,,,a theory is a far cry from a fact, and until then, you can whine until the cows come home, it will not elevate your opinion above believers in Christ. That is the funny thing. _ and logic, you hypocritically embrace the latter concepts as they suit you, and irrespective of your 'belief'. =A0=A0Of course I embrace them as they suit "me". That is part of what religion is, an extreme personal and profound relationship with one who is more real than you....God. Just because a tangible doesn't exist you prefer to deny the possibility of the existence? This isn't science, Frank. In fact, your poor example contradicts scienc and any point you are trying to portray concerning science, showing you have no clue about acual science. You are way off the mark here and rambling in areas you know nothing of. Science embraces all possibilities until they are exhausted via the process of elimination. You have not done so, and neither has science, hence,,the missing link, but that hasn't stopped you from making up your mind and insulting those who share another belief other than your Twisted version. _ Those who are incapable of accepting the responsibilities of their own actions seek adjudication from a 'higher power'. _ Adjudication? Do you mean "abdication", as in abdication of sins? Your brush is getting wide again, and your canine teeth are showing your discontent and contempt for christianity. _ I meant 'adjudication', just like I said. And you really need to learn the definitions of the words you use -- sins are not subject to "abdication". LOL,,you profess to not believe in God yet believe in his word enough to quote it? LOL! Ahahaha! And yes, sins are most definitely subject to abdication via religion. Ask any catholic for an explanation of the sacrament of confession for an inside look at your buffoonery and smack talk of a subject you haven't a clue.. _ _ And, according to my visiting grand-nephew, "You go to church when nobody likes you because the Bible says people who go to church -have- to like you," _ I'm not surprised. If he is related to you, it is of little wonder that he is already Twisted. Not "twisted", Twisty. Just observant. Oh no! Those who have no belief system, other than the belief you will have another drink, are not only doomed, but probably deserve their earthly self-created hell. Was this nephew of yours observant when you beat your old lady, Frank? _ I didn't think you would pass me down through your generations, Frank. No need for you to start thinking now, Twisty. You keep bringing children into the equation, Frank. It's enough to get anyone remotely familiar with you, thinking. _ which mirrors the observations made throughout history that religions thrive on social rejects. Pretty god damn sharp for a 6 year old! Your observations are clouded by personality conflicts. I point to your repeated retardations concerning the inability to comprehend a basic law of English whereas the preposition is perfectly acceptable in ending a sentence. But it illustrates your hypocrisy and personal strife magnificently. You began menstruating all over the group concerning my vernacular, claiming it was too high-brow. I toned it down merely to suit you, now you have a problem with it yet again, and (sigh) you are wrong,,,,again. _ The rejects are the ones that need attack others beliefs, as you so adepty illustrated your willingness to do such. I don't attack the true spritual beliefs of others You're lying, Frank. You have indeed done exactly that in the past. Denying it won't change your posts, it merely illustrates you know how wrong it was, so you have the need to lie about your behavior.. _ -- I attack hypocrites like you who hide behind the veil of religion, =A0 =A0Where did I ever do that? Oh, I know, that post must reside with the non-existent one that you claim exists where I said you were a child molester....LOL! How about placing them both side by side, right here, for all to see my hypocrisy? Can ya' manage that, Frank? Put them alongside the post you claimed exists where I said the Golden Rule was about something other than treating those the way they treat another. Three posts you lied about, let's see how many you can produce..LOL..you know,,,to show me how wrong I am...LOL. _ much like you hide behind your alias in this newsgroup. =A0=A0Gee Frank,,,,doing what all ISP's tell you, what all internet security experts tell you, and what all of society tells you,,,...sure gets you riled and crying. And now we now why,,,,,,,it's to keep such information out of the hands of the likes of YOU. YOU are the poster-child for the software companies selling privacy software. As many times as you parroted the "If you didn't do anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about", this is a fitting time to hold you to such standards. In fact, I submit, that you protest and bitch and moan so much concerning my, and other's personal identity, that you couldn't possibly want the information for anything but malicious and wanton acts, otherwise, you wouldn't worry about it to the point it controls alll facets of your sub-life. _ And to correct your bull****, the bible says " Build not churches to worship me, but come to me directly through the Son." Church is a frame of mind, not a physical structure. You will never comprehend such things, Frank,,one needs faith,,all you have is darkness, dilemmas, and unhealthy obsessions. Right. Sure. Which no-code hammie do you think I am -this- week, Twisty? I nderstand the mild retardations and communication deficits prevent you from following a chian of related thoughts, but I would like to take this small opportunity to illustrate how you ran like hell from your bible misquotes and change your direction and topic to one of identity again...(sigh)..I like to indulge you when you;re ****ed, Frank,,you make your bed just fine when you;re upset. Who do you want to be this week, Frank? If I change my mind next week, will that prevent you from dropping to your knees, blessing yourself with the sign of the "T", and asking me again? Who do yo think I am, this week, Frank? This identity game has you over a barrel and the crack of your big, stinky ass is showing. Again, since my identity controls your sanity, it can be had for the right price. But you're too lazy and too poor to actually find it yourself, you want something for nothing and when told "No", you react accordingly,,like a toddler. _ And what does the Bible say about lying? Bearing false witness? Stealing? Shooting mushroom-picking college kids? How are any of your above warblings in any manner relevant to your mild retardations and blatantly false accusations and lies that I accused you of being a child molester, Frank? Appears someone else knows you a bit better than I and knew exactly which chain to jerk. She dropped charges against you before she left, eh Frank? All there for the reading,,IF you know where to look, which, you ahve proved over the last several years, you are incompetent and impotent when it comes to such tasks.. _ Strangely enough, I hope I'm wrong -- You're always wrong, frank, ,,,,everyone realizes that, it's why you are held in such esteem by Dogie and the AKC. _ I hope there really is a god, because then you will have a lot of explaining to do come judgment day (and that's 'judgment', as in 'adjudicate') to someone that will see ALL your bull****. And if I'm there when you try and spin the "judge" with your misdirections, logical fallacies, pathetic justifications, misperceived conincidences and blatant lies, I'll laugh myself all the way to Hell! You won't need to, Frank. I can see it now..... Hoo-Boy,,,you sure have a way of tricking your damaged mind into believing your conjured images..LOL. God: "So what do you have to say for yourself?" Twisty: "....uh, HE said he was N7VCF!" God: "No he didn't." Twisty: "....well, he IMPLIED he was...." God: "No he didn't." Twisty: "...(sigh)...but he was so obsessed with that identity..." God: "No he wasn't, you were. In fact, it was you that suggested he was five different hams." Twisty: "And each one was justified!" God: "How so?" Twisty: "Well, he and Leland Scott both posted from Supernews...." God: "So did many others." God wouldn't lie for you. Many others did NOT post from supernews at the time. Only you mongoloids of trouble and chaos both were posting from supernews and both had your accounts yanked. _ Twisty: "But they both wrote the same kind of pro-legal dribble..." God: "So you reasoned that he was Leland Scott because you thought it was either impossible or highly unlikely that they could have been two different people?" Twisty: "Yes! And of course you know how everybody in the newsgroup had several different identities...." God: "No, not everybody. Only a few did, one of them being yourself." Twisty: "Well, ok. But that was before I discovered another newsgroup hammie by the name Glenn Sparks.... get it? Sparky? Sparks?" God: "....hmmm." Twisty: "But what about this: I looked up Sparky's name in the ham database and found N7VCF. I compared pictures on N7VCF's website and on Sparky's website, and guess what: They both had a beard! And N7VCF lived in Issaquah, and Sparky said he was from Issaquah...." God: "No he didn't." Twisty: "But he didn't deny it...." God: "Yes he did." God also knows you are a habitual liar that was forced into admitting such when your bull**** was thrown back to your overweight, physically abusive self. _ Twisty: "Get over your communication deficit, God! N7VCF lived only 300 miles away from Sparky, and that was just too close to be a coincidence in a country of nearly half a billion people....." ........... ROTFL! =A0=A0 I like when you get all ****ed, Frank, You forget yourself..LOL. Well, I'm glad to see you laugh, Frank, no matter if you need to continually be underfoot on the floor in order to accomplish such. One needs a sense of humor when it appears by your claims that so many have accused you of such a horrendous crime against children. That you continue to cling to the belief it was myself sheds some light on your obsessive nature toward myslef, but Frank, you have never been more wrong in your life, but just like the Latin lesson, you have the right to insist you remain ignorant, even if such beliefs contribute to your own detriment. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I compared pictures on N7VCF's website and on Sparky's website, and
guess what: They both had a beard! ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Frank Gilliland wrote: In , (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Frank Gilliland) In , (Twistedhed) wrote: snip Using the "F" word is not taking the lord's name in vain. _ Interesting topic, this "taking the lord's name in vain" issue. I have heard lots of holy-rollers whine and cry when someone says "god damn". But what really is god's name? Doesn't the bible say that god's name is unknowable? Like, when Moses asked god for his name, all he got was, "I am". So if nobody knows the name of god, how can anybody use it in vain? _ By intentionally referring to the almighty..the term a mortal applies is irrelevant. Your statement presupposes monotheism. _ You're a bible-thumper, Twist -- what do you think? I think some are in a sad state concerning God. Your response was just like I would expect from a bible-thumper.... you can't accept the reality that the religious and/or spiritual 'state' of anyone else is none of your concern. Nor is it your place to judge others based on the precepts of your own personal beliefs, especially when you fail to live according to those precepts...... remember your version of the "Golden Rule", Twist? Those who obviously are in dire need of spiritual direction and refer to one who believes in the God of Abraham as a "Bible-thumper",,,continue to produce the most inaccurate posts regarding anything to date. Those who are overwhelmed by the realities of science and logic usually abandon them in favor of the simplicity of religion. Those who are incapable of accepting the responsibilities of their own actions seek adjudication from a 'higher power'. And, according to my visiting grand-nephew, "You go to church when nobody likes you because the Bible says people who go to church -have- to like you," which mirrors the observations made throughout history that religions thrive on social rejects. Pretty god damn sharp for a 6 year old! -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- good post frank... |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
money | Antenna | |||
21st Century E-Commerce Money Making Formula | Antenna | |||
F6FBB to Internet email? | Digital | |||
HAMS...be aware of the AFRICAN diamond email scam, heres some info and diamond quality scam | General | |||
F6FBB to Internet email? | Digital |