Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Hall" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 May 2004 13:45:36 GMT, "Landshark" wrote: There's a difference with "community" involvement and State involvement. While I might say something to someone in my town, I will not bother with some guy on the highway, that would never see me again in a million years. So, can I assume then that you have no alternative answer? Should we just allow society to regress in much the same manner as operators on CB radio did? There's not much you can do about society as a whole. You can only make your part of society the best you can. Raise the children with good values and to respect their elders. I can not see the regress of CB as the eminent downfall of society. Any cop will tell you not to confront a law breaker, call them and let them know, that is their job. Throw a ball in front of a speeding car, make him swerve, possibly crash, injure himself or someone other, you will be the law breaker, not the speeder. That would not be a good idea. But leaving a little "note" on the offender's car every time it happens, including the forwarding of their license number to the cops, might make someone think a little. To get a ticket, an officer must see the offence happen, just telling him that Jimmie was speeding won't do anything. Maybe if we all lived in Mayberry RFD something might happen, but not in this day & age. Maybe that needs to change to some degree. You're right of course, and that knowledge just enables lawbreakers. Perhaps if people could be cited without a LEO physically witnessing the offense, the problem would diminish. Never happen, due process of the law. We are not deputized by the local government to enforce the law. Also, same issue as with enforcing FCC rules by local law, we would have to go through many hour or training, do you have the time? I don't raising two kids working 9+ hours a day. Technology offers yet another solution. GPS technology and OBD-II emission control systems can be integrated to the point where all functions of the car can be monitored. If the car travels down a road over the posted speed limit, it sends a little "On-Star" type message to a LEO, and a ticket in then issued. This has the added benefit of enabling the tracking of the car if it were to be stolen. This is similar to the idea of mounting cameras to take pictures of people running red lights. People will scream "Big Brother". But maybe that's what it takes when you can't trust people to behave on their own. Already done, dismissed in the courts. A rental car agency was doing that, issuing speeding tickets to thier customers, the courts ordered them to stop. There's a difference between a rental car agency and a provision in the law. If the law were changed, it would be allowed. Your testimony only proves that the technology is viable. Yes Technology is available, but it won't be used, at least probably not in our lifetime. As for the rental car agency, they were turning them into the state troopers, the DA then threw the cases out of court. As a parent, I have become very conscious of people speeding through residential neighborhoods. I would hate to have my kid or an neighbor's kid fall victim to someone who's ignoring a "nuisance" law. Good Luck! I've gone to the city and county councils, tried to get the street closed at one end, to prevent all the people from speeding down my street to get over to their street faster, but not a chance. Speed bumps? Yeah right! I don't want to hear the sound of cars "jumping" the speed bumps at all hours of the night & day. So the best they can offer is "selective" enforcement, LOL!! Useless! Hmm.... I'm not sure how I want to proceed here. On the one hand I can lambast you for your duplicitous position with regard to "selective" speeding (It's ok, just don't do it on my street). Yeah you could, but then this thread will have gone from a civil thread to an abusive thread. Not really. I don't lambast people directly, only their ideas. I am a little that way, as for around town I don't really speed, out in the coutry side, on the bike, yeah. But again about the worst that can happen there is tha I kill myself. As for on the freeway, Bronco doesn't go over 70MPH, so don't speed there. My other cars on the freeway, I'll admit that I ocassionally go over the speed limit, but nothing dramatic, most cars are still passing me, so the cops go by me and catch the guy that's going 20-30 MPH over the speed limit. Same thing here. I never speed in a residential area. I may push it to 60 or 62 MPH on the highway, since they can't cite you in Pa, until you exceed 5 MPH over the limit. Speed limit in this state on the highways and freeways is between 55 & 75 MPH. On the other hand, I might be tempted to say that you give up too easily. Politicians have to answer to the people, usually those who make the most noise. Record the problem. Present the issue to the town council, their decisions are public record. Make it known that if, at some point in the future, a kid does get killed due to a speeding car, that they can be held as a party to the crime, due to their negligence, and refusal to act to mitigate the situation in the face of irrefutable evidence. That's correct, petitions, 80% of residents, they still didn't care. Yes, it usually takes a fatality for locals to install stops signs, speed enforcement etc etc in the state of California. You usually can not hold a California politician accountably unless they show gross disregard or criminal activity. Those petitions and other actions that you take can be admitted as evidence. Their lack of response can then be interpreted as "gross negligence". Most juries would be more inclined to side with the dead kid's parents than a do-nothing politician. Again, good luck trying in this state. I'm sure there is some sort of immunity laws that protect the *******s. Maybe if a few cases set precedent, other local politicians will sit up and take notice. Doubtful, look at the how we had to spend billions to get rid of a governor, that took a surplus of billions of dollars and made it a deficit of billions of dollars in only a couple of years. Dave "Sandbagger" Landshark -- The world is good-natured to people who are good natured. |