He will anyway. Wouldn't you if you had the wife he has??????

On 27 Oct 2004 15:48:49 -0700, (Stephen) wrote
in :

He will anyway. Wouldn't you if you had the wife he has??????


Aw, come on, she's pretty hot for her age. But his daughter -- now
that's a different story. Mighty tasty AND she has some brains. In
fact, I think she did a better job in the spin room than her dad did
in the debate!





----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 27 Oct 2004 15:48:49 -0700, (Stephen) wrote
in :

He will anyway. Wouldn't you if you had the wife he has??????

Aw, come on, she's pretty hot for her age. But his daughter -- now
that's a different story. Mighty tasty AND she has some brains. In
fact, I think she did a better job in the spin room than her dad did
in the debate!

The choices suck canal water. This is the best we have!!??

On 27 Oct 2004 23:50:37 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 27 Oct 2004 15:48:49 -0700, (Stephen) wrote
in :

He will anyway. Wouldn't you if you had the wife he has??????

Aw, come on, she's pretty hot for her age. But his daughter -- now
that's a different story. Mighty tasty AND she has some brains. In
fact, I think she did a better job in the spin room than her dad did
in the debate!

The choices suck canal water. This is the best we have!!??


www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 27 Oct 2004 23:50:37 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 27 Oct 2004 15:48:49 -0700, (Stephen) wrote
in :

He will anyway. Wouldn't you if you had the wife he has??????

Aw, come on, she's pretty hot for her age. But his daughter -- now
that's a different story. Mighty tasty AND she has some brains. In
fact, I think she did a better job in the spin room than her dad did
in the debate!

The choices suck canal water. This is the best we have!!??

www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.

True enough but he has as much chance as you or I getting elected. Funny
sorta that it sticks in my mind about Ralph fighting for the Corvair
owners. My Dad had one that was loads of fun, in fact he used to put
that Corvair up on the railroad tracks and half deflate the tires.. That
car would hum down those tracks and my old man would be laughing his
ass off yelling "look no hands"!

Me and my dad have done some crazy **** over the years, but I never
figured Ralph Nader would be a common bond for him and I. That kind
of change probably won't happen in our lifetime, Frank.

On 28 Oct 2004 03:34:35 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

snip
www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.

True enough but he has as much chance as you or I getting elected.


I don't vote for someone based on their chances to win. What good is
that? What message are you sending? That you are content with the
lesser of two evils? You should vote for whoever you think will do the
best job.

Because people keep voting for who they think will be the 'winner',
the next president will either be tweedle-dum or tweedle-dee (thank
you, Helen Keller, for your wonderful insight), and partisan politics
will always take precedence over common sense and public interests.
The two parties like it that way. Both were scared ****less when Perot
made a strong showing in his first run. But instead of choosing better
candidates to compete against third parties, they shut-out the other
parties as much as possible.

I vote for independence -- independence from the two-party cartel. We
will never be given better choices until we begin to -make- better
choices. IMHO.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 28 Oct 2004 03:34:35 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

snip
www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.

True enough but he has as much chance as you or I getting elected.

I don't vote for someone based on their chances to win. What good is
that? What message are you sending? That you are content with the
lesser of two evils? You should vote for whoever you think will do the
best job.

We could write in people too. Maybe Ross Perot or Captain Kangaroo, that
won't change reality much tho, now will it?

Hey, at least you and I vote, I wish more people would.

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On 28 Oct 2004 03:34:35 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

snip
www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.

True enough but he has as much chance as you or I getting elected.


I don't vote for someone based on their chances to win. What good is
that? What message are you sending? That you are content with the
lesser of two evils? You should vote for whoever you think will do the
best job.

Because people keep voting for who they think will be the 'winner',
the next president will either be tweedle-dum or tweedle-dee (thank
you, Helen Keller, for your wonderful insight), and partisan politics
will always take precedence over common sense and public interests.
The two parties like it that way. Both were scared ****less when Perot
made a strong showing in his first run. But instead of choosing better
candidates to compete against third parties, they shut-out the other
parties as much as possible.

I vote for independence -- independence from the two-party cartel. We
will never be given better choices until we begin to -make- better
choices. IMHO.





But Frank, even though I agree with you 100%, do you think it's possible to
pound this in to the voter's minds?

That's easy to do when you only answer to 3% of the population. If you
depended on pleasing over 50%(to get re-elected), his answers would be VERY
different.

Don

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On 27 Oct 2004 23:50:37 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 27 Oct 2004 15:48:49 -0700, (Stephen) wrote
in :

He will anyway. Wouldn't you if you had the wife he has??????

Aw, come on, she's pretty hot for her age. But his daughter -- now
that's a different story. Mighty tasty AND she has some brains. In
fact, I think she did a better job in the spin room than her dad did
in the debate!

The choices suck canal water. This is the best we have!!??


www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000
Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:09:21 -0400, "M-Tech"
wrote in :

That's easy to do when you only answer to 3% of the population. If you
depended on pleasing over 50%(to get re-elected), his answers would be VERY
different.


If over 50% of the voters made their choices based on facts and logic
instead of picking the candidate that makes them "feel good", his
answers wouldn't need to be ANY different.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---