| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
February 15th 05, 03:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:29:58 -0500, Dave Hall wrote:
That's a far cry from you claiming it was a "requirement" the Pa. police *give* you the extra speed of a few miles per hour. Nevertheless, you illustrate once again you speak of things you know nothing of (the law) and do not need Frank to make you reverse your earlier position. Since you realized your error, there is no need to provide you with the Pa. vehicle code. Flip-flop. You're right. I shouldn't have deviated from my original stance since, as it turns out, I was right about it. See: http://members.aol.com/StatutesP1/75PA3368.html Pay particular attention to 3368 (c) number 4., which states: "No person may be convicted upon evidence obtained through the use of devices authorized by paragraphs (2) and (3) unless the speed recorded is six or more miles per hour in excess of the legal speed limit. Furthermore, no person may be convicted upon evidence obtained through the use of devices authorized by paragraph (3) in an area where the legal speed limit is less than 55 miles per hour if the speed recorded is less than ten miles per hour in excess of the legal speed limit. This paragraph shall not apply to evidence obtained through the use of devices authorized by paragraph (3) within a school zone" So what were you saying about knowing the law? Ouch. Vinnie S. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Type "miserable failure" at a Google search and see what the first hit is... LMFAO | Shortwave | |||
| Icom R8500 failure | Shortwave | |||
| Have you had an FT-817 finals failure? | Equipment | |||
| Have you had an FT-817 finals failure? | Equipment | |||
| A Moral Failure | Shortwave | |||
Threaded Mode
