Dan/W4NTI wrote:
Any chance you guys that have worked them or even heard them could put it on
here so the rest of the folks could stand a chance.

Seems every time I get on where there supposed to be the signals are poor to
say the least.

They've been plenty loud on 30m (I forget where - 10103?) and 40m (7023)
fairly often. Just keep a watch on those frequencies. Unfortunately
the pileup behavior has also been worst on those frequencies.

They were a lot weaker (but still well within the capability of your
station) on 15 and 17m, where the piles were a lot better-behaved.
21023 may be worth staking out.

I heard them here on 12 meters but nowhere near well enough to work.
--
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66
http://www.w9wi.com

Ham stuff for sale:
http://www.w9wi.com/articles/4sale.htm

"Doug Smith W9WI" wrote in message
...
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
Any chance you guys that have worked them or even heard them could put it
on here so the rest of the folks could stand a chance.

Seems every time I get on where there supposed to be the signals are poor
to say the least.

They've been plenty loud on 30m (I forget where - 10103?) and 40m (7023)
fairly often. Just keep a watch on those frequencies. Unfortunately the
pileup behavior has also been worst on those frequencies.

They were a lot weaker (but still well within the capability of your
station) on 15 and 17m, where the piles were a lot better-behaved. 21023
may be worth staking out.

I heard them here on 12 meters but nowhere near well enough to work.


17 has been the easy band from out here in the NW.

In fact, they were calling CQ on 18.143 a bit ago,
with no takers and a good signal

--

... Hank

http://home.earthlink.net/~horedson
http://home.earthlink.net/~w0rli