Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Charlie" wrote in message
... On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:37:51 +0100, gareth wrote: what's the best approach to repairing tape decks where the nylon-ish band used for take-up has gone completely squishy (and resulted in a build-up of tape inside the deck instead of on the take-up spool)? Just do the same as other people, for example, search on eBay for "tape recorder belt". But that's £10 a time for a loop of elastic! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:33:15 +0100, gareth wrote:
But that's £10 a time for a loop of elastic! Sometimes you have to shoulder the pain and dust off the wallet! Charlie. -- www.votenationalbird.com/ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015, Charlie wrote:
On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:33:15 +0100, gareth wrote: But that's £10 a time for a loop of elastic! Sometimes you have to shoulder the pain and dust off the wallet! When I needed a new turntable belt about five years ago, it cost me around $8.00, but that was at a local store that I could actually visit. It did seem expensive, but I spent quite a bit on it in 1978, and it's been fine ever since, except that belt became too loose. So eight dollars upkeep on something that old is pretty good. Michael |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael Black" wrote in message
xample.org... On Sat, 11 Apr 2015, Charlie wrote: On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:33:15 +0100, gareth wrote: But that's £10 a time for a loop of elastic! Sometimes you have to shoulder the pain and dust off the wallet! When I needed a new turntable belt about five years ago, it cost me around $8.00, but that was at a local store that I could actually visit. It did seem expensive, but I spent quite a bit on it in 1978, and it's been fine ever since, except that belt became too loose. So eight dollars upkeep on something that old is pretty good. The ITT mono deck is at least 46 years old, and not identified in the list of spare belts. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/11/2015 6:37 PM, gareth wrote:
"Michael Black" wrote in message xample.org... On Sat, 11 Apr 2015, Charlie wrote: On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:33:15 +0100, gareth wrote: But that's £10 a time for a loop of elastic! Sometimes you have to shoulder the pain and dust off the wallet! When I needed a new turntable belt about five years ago, it cost me around $8.00, but that was at a local store that I could actually visit. It did seem expensive, but I spent quite a bit on it in 1978, and it's been fine ever since, except that belt became too loose. So eight dollars upkeep on something that old is pretty good. The ITT mono deck is at least 46 years old, and not identified in the list of spare belts. No surprise there. Do you still use the B&W TV you had in 1970? How about the car you drove then? Here in the US such an old car would be considered an antique and registering with "historic" plates means you can't drive it for every day needs. People keep their turntables and tape decks running either because they have a misguided sense of sound quality or they just like keeping antiques around. Is there a reason why you don't update to something easier to use and retain the recording produced? Do you really want to manage the stack of tapes produced by the ITT deck? BTW, for the most part, a rubber band is a rubber band. Try some regular rubber bands tied together for a quick fix if you have to. -- Rick |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015, gareth wrote:
"Michael Black" wrote in message xample.org... On Sat, 11 Apr 2015, Charlie wrote: On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:33:15 +0100, gareth wrote: But that's ?10 a time for a loop of elastic! Sometimes you have to shoulder the pain and dust off the wallet! When I needed a new turntable belt about five years ago, it cost me around $8.00, but that was at a local store that I could actually visit. It did seem expensive, but I spent quite a bit on it in 1978, and it's been fine ever since, except that belt became too loose. So eight dollars upkeep on something that old is pretty good. The ITT mono deck is at least 46 years old, and not identified in the list of spare belts. You take the existing belt to the store, they don't look for "matching part number" but for belt that fits. Anyone selling belts at this point has some idea of how they stretch, so they can find you a belt of the right length, even though the current belt is likely stretched. I can't believe this belt is something so out of the ordinary that it has to be identical to what was put in there in the first place. Michael |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael Black" wrote in message
xample.org... You take the existing belt to the store, they don't look for "matching part number" but for belt that fits. Long since consigned to the dustbin in its many pieces |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 17:33:24 +0100, gareth wrote:
Long since consigned to the dustbin in its many pieces Use a piece of string to get the length. -- www.votenationalbird.com/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|