In article , Walt Davidson wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:36:25 GMT, Concerned Amateur
wrote:

Your about as relevant as the Monarchy....[NOT]

Interesting, then, that a majority of Australians voted to keep the
Monarchy last time they were asked.

I wonder what proportion of Brits would vote to keep on allowing
Aussies to come and live in the UK, if we were asked the question.

73 de G3NYY


Sure olle Bean, I would love to live in a country that never sees sunshine..

In article . net, Dan/W4NTI wrote:

Or can't you do so without spinning things way out of wack? ONE MORE
TIME;;;;;;IT IS NOT HAM RADIO. IT IS INTERNET CONNECTED TO RADIO. DON'T
CALL IT HAM RADIO.

Dan/W4NTI


Your so called arguements are **trolling**. It all started with a posting
about an IRLP contest. No, you added nothing about wishing to join
the contest, all you and your buddies have managed to do is make total
assess out of yourselves, ****ing about with definitions.

IRLP and Echolink have demonstrated how Amateur Radio and the Internet
can work together in harmony.

All you and your **Trolling mates** have done is act like total Pratts.

IRLP is an **extension** of Hamradio, get over it....

In article . net, Dan/W4NTI wrote:

"nana" wrote in message
...
http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/


First off....with your example of a repeater linked to another via land-line
AND NOT VIA THE INTERNET THAT CAN BE ACCESSED BY OTHERS is perfectly fine.
Narrow view or not. You sir, are attemting to confuse the issue and
comparing Apples and Oranges. Sorry, that won't play. Again...stick on
the subject.

You know dang well what the differences are. If you don't then you need an
education.

Dan/W4NTI



Dan, you really need to move out from under the stairs and begin the **LONG
PROCESS** of developing your little used SOCIAL SKILLS.

Currently you have none and hence your **TROLL** tendencies

In article , Walt Davidson wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:33:16 -0000, "DieSea"
wrote:

Finally **** Listed , a QUAINT turn of Phrase being a dim and ignorant POM I'm
having problems fathoming that one out.

Australians seem to have a preoccupation with lavatorial matters. I
discovered that a lot of them think it's amusing to fart in company
too. (An unpleasant trait that they share with Cardiff people of both
sexes!)

73 de G3NYY


Exactly why youself and Walty are **TROLLS**. Your easily distracted to
discuss matters that you have great experience at.

May I suggest you join the alt.farting.troll.uk newsgoup where you can
exchange pleasantries with your ilk...

In article , Walt Davidson wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:24:16 -0500, Mike Coslo
wrote:

Dan, why are IRLP fans so quick to tell people to shut up and go away
when someone disagrees with them. Are people like you and "concerned
amateur" typical of what we might meet if we sample the mode?

They are very typical, Mike. They all have one thing in common ...
they are CBers masquerading as radio amateurs.

73 de G3NYY


At least you add no ambiguity.. Your idiots masquerading as idiots

In article , Walt Davidson wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:42:09 GMT, Concerned Amateur
wrote:

Your ability to draw useless conclusions is only surpassed by the lack
of any support you seem to be able to muster in your fight for *TRUTH,
JUSTICE and the American WAY* :-)

Dear me. It's beginning to sound like "Everyone's out of step except
the Aussies!"

73 de G3NYY


Seems like only you and your Walty mate dont seem to get it. Everyone
else in this newsgoup seems to have no issues with IRLP, Hamradio
yet you do....

Your ability to conduct any constructive reasoning is overcome
by your **trolling** techniques....

Let enthusiastic folk expand the boundaries of Amatuer Radio and we'll
leave the bull****ting to you..

In article , Walt Davidson wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 18:56:26 +1100, G-S wrote:

Well If I use IRLP (and I don't contest btw) then I talk into my "radio" and
someone else talks into thier "radio"

"Talking into thier radio" (sic) is what CBers do. Radio hams
*operate* their radios .... and sometimes even build them.

The middle bit is "packets" like my old VFH "packet" radio

A VFH packet radio? Is that some kind of CB rig?

73 de G3NYY

**TROLL**

In article , Jock wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:08:56 +1100, Simon VK3XEM wrote:

Besides, how many operators are going to be contesting all month? Most
I would expect will just jump on in their spare time, just as they would
for normal operating.

Are you seriously labelling the morons who indulge in this sort
of nonsense "operators"? Seriously?

73 de Jock.

Morons are like you Jock....cant accept a broader concept of radio.
If it doesnt meet your **SPECIFIC** interpretation, out come the labels.

You really should go back to your Black Model-T ford

In article , Walt Davidson wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:26:02 GMT, "Stan" wrote:

Whether it is radio or not, if you are not a fan of contests, (and I am
not), then those contesting via IRLP may well result in a decrease in HF
radio traffic, leaving the DX clear for others. Which I appreciate...

I can understand where you're coming from, Stan. But unfortunately no
self-respecting contester would have anything to do with something as
banal as an "IRLP Contest".

73 de G3NYY


There you go, if it **DOESNT** meet your **NARROW** definition of Amateur
Radio, it must be nonsence.

You REALLY are a pompus **TROLL**

"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:53:39 +1100, "Martin, VK2UMJ"
wrote:

If you support the landline linking of repeaters then you MUST also
support
the IRLP system, it is the exact same concept except using technology that
makes it affordable to almost every ham....

But we don't. We don't support repeaters at all. It was when voice
repeaters were introduced on the 2m and 70cm bands in the early
seventies that the rot began to set in.

Now we see the true problem with IRLP... If it isn't HF, spark-gap and
pedal powered it just isn't amateur radio, is it! I guess you also build
your own radio gear, totally, don't you? I mean, using commercial built
gear just isn't what amateur radio is all about, is it!

So, satellites, ISS, space shuttle, packet, ATV and SSTV should all be
removed from the hobby as well? Just good old CW and spark-gap or valve
gear only, home built on a piece of ply-wood............

People like YOU are the main reason newcomers decide to dump ham radio or
not even start in the first place. Stuck up, pompass, arrogant old fossils
stuck in the past and unwilling to even consider new or changing technology.
I guess you also have your very own group of fellow hams (those that haven't
been moved to a nursing home yet) that you regularly chat to on HF, refusing
to admit any newcomers to the QSO because, let's face it, if they didn't
have to totally build their own radio using nothing but safety pins,
paperclips and the wire from an old AM wireless, AND have a written
reference from Morse himself, then they just aren't hams, are they....

Oh, and by the way, you really need to keep up with the thread - some of
your fellow 'debaters' have already admitted that repeater linking by
landline is perfectly acceptable, so you can't even manage to get your own
side to agree with your opinions!! What a JOKE!!!

Sorry Walt, but IMHO (In My Humble Opinion for the oldies) ham radio would
be far better without YOU, and those like YOU. Otherwise, the hobby will no
doubt die as operators like you constantly alienate new technology and
newcomers alike. Hope you enjoy the onset of BPL!!!


--
Martin, VK2UMJ

To reply by e-mail, replace ".invalid" with ".com.au"


"I cannot help but notice that there is no problem
between us that cannot be solved by your departure."