![]() |
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:03:42 +1100, Simon VK3XEM wrote:
What is there to debate, there is a large network of IRLP nodes all over the world on Amateur Radio which proves it is a popular and valid part of the hobby. There are probably thousands of 6 MHz (and other) pirates and illegal CB-ers around. Are you saying they too are a valid part of the hobby? 73 de Jock. -- "Maybe this world is another planet's Hell." - Aldous Huxley (1894-1963) |
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:59:45 -0000, "Brian Reay"
wrote: "Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message k.net... It seems to me the ONLY person here having a problem is Brian. The problem I have is understanding the bitterness I see over something that, for most people, would rank below picking tomorrow's breakfast cereal. . If someone wants to call VOIP 'amateur radio' so what? Because it demeans the hobby and brings it down to a level akin to that of CB. That doesn't bother you? 73 de Jock. -- "Maybe this world is another planet's Hell." - Aldous Huxley (1894-1963) |
"Simon VK3XEM" wrote in message ... Dan/W4NTI wrote: "Brian Reay" wrote in message ... "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Brian Reay wrote: Well, in that case why don't you call it something else. Then come back when someone makes you call it by the name that upsets you. Untill then, 'mellow out'. Dan, why are IRLP fans so quick to tell people to shut up and go away when someone disagrees with them. Are people like you and "concerned amateur" typical of what we might meet if we sample the mode? I don't think anyone is saying "shut up" etc. I'm saying unless ILRP impacts you, why worry? Over the years I've come across many amateurs who hated some aspect of the hobby- packet, anything computer based,........ Not one ever seems to have found a niche they really do like. -- Brian Reay www.g8osn.org.uk www.amateurradiotraining.org.uk FP#898 There you go putting words into my mouth again Brian. I never said I hate IRLP. I said I don't like it being called Ham Radio. And I don't much care if you like my opinion or not. So there. Dan/W4NTI What I don't like is the way you are putting down a legitimate part of the hobby. Whether you like it or not it IS a legitimate part of Amateur Radio. -- The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to. 73 de Simon, VK3XEM. http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/cli...IENT_NO=157452 VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/ You STILL don't get it do you? Try addressing what I am complaining about. Or can't you do so without spinning things way out of wack? ONE MORE TIME;;;;;;IT IS NOT HAM RADIO. IT IS INTERNET CONNECTED TO RADIO. DON'T CALL IT HAM RADIO. Dan/W4NTI |
"Martin, VK2UMJ" wrote in message ... "Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message k.net... [SNIP] Gawd Almighty you Ausies are a thick headed bunch, ain't ya? Ham RADIO is communications with a RADIO or a RADIO system. INTERNET is communications with a NETWORK of interconnected computers organized in such a manner to send "packets" of data world-wide. Do you see any mention of RADIO there? Yes, as a matter of fact, because the correct name for IRLP is Internet Radio Linking Project. See www.irlp.net Note that is a USA website describing IRLP, not an Aussie site... A quote from the irlp.net website: "The aim of this project is to reliably and inexpensively link amateur radio systems without the use of RF links, leased lines, or satellites." So, next question? -- Martin, VK2UMJ Not a question, a statement. If it is linked by ANY means other than radio, it is not ham radio. End of discussion. Dan/W4NTI |
"Jock." wrote in message
... Because it demeans the hobby and brings it down to a level akin to that of CB. That doesn't bother you? Firstly I don't agree that VOIP systems brings a "CB element" to the hobby, any more than any other facet does. Secondly, if I look across all the bad elements I've come across in the hobby, only a few entered it via the CB route. -- Brian Reay www.g8osn.org.uk www.amateurradiotraining.org.uk FP#898 |
http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/
You STILL don't get it do you? Try addressing what I am complaining about. Or can't you do so without spinning things way out of wack? ONE MORE TIME;;;;;;IT IS NOT HAM RADIO. IT IS INTERNET CONNECTED TO RADIO. DON'T CALL IT HAM RADIO. Dan/W4NTI There are mighty linked repeater networks across the USA. These are Ham Radio? If I choose to link two Ham Radio Repeaters via a landline - This isn't Ham Radio? Even though two Ham Radio service areas may be served? I've been using my computers on PSK31, but one is in the family room, connected to this computer via CAT5 cable, and then to my HF radio. Is this NOT Ham Radio? You guys have a very NARROW view of what constitutes Ham Radio. It appears that NOTHING less than a 100% Radio circuit is good enough for you, yet if you analyse systems around the world, MANY are not 100% Radio. Brad. |
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message ink.net... "Martin, VK2UMJ" wrote in message ... "Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message k.net... [SNIP] Gawd Almighty you Ausies are a thick headed bunch, ain't ya? Ham RADIO is communications with a RADIO or a RADIO system. INTERNET is communications with a NETWORK of interconnected computers organized in such a manner to send "packets" of data world-wide. Do you see any mention of RADIO there? Yes, as a matter of fact, because the correct name for IRLP is Internet Radio Linking Project. See www.irlp.net Note that is a USA website describing IRLP, not an Aussie site... A quote from the irlp.net website: "The aim of this project is to reliably and inexpensively link amateur radio systems without the use of RF links, leased lines, or satellites." So, next question? -- Martin, VK2UMJ Not a question, a statement. If it is linked by ANY means other than radio, it is not ham radio. End of discussion. Dan/W4NTI So basically, what you're saying is that if you have a few repeaters linked together by a landline, then those ham repeaters aren't ham radio? Or if a club likes to control a repeater site via a phone line, then that too isn't ham radio? I used to be very active on the TCP/IP packet nets, using my VHF radio and TNC to link to a gateway and on into the world wide converse net. Again, the very thing you say isn't ham radio. I'd say your definition is way too pure for the rest of us hobbyists, and we'll all keep right on enjoying the part of our *hobby* that we find we like the best, and if that just happens to be IRLP, Echolink, SSTV, CW, ATV or whatever other mode/method then, sorry, that's the way it is. Deal with it. Kate vk4xyl |
Jock. wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:03:42 +1100, Simon VK3XEM wrote: What is there to debate, there is a large network of IRLP nodes all over the world on Amateur Radio which proves it is a popular and valid part of the hobby. There are probably thousands of 6 MHz (and other) pirates and illegal CB-ers around. Are you saying they too are a valid part of the hobby? 73 de Jock. You are a *FOOL*, what has that got to do with *LICENSED* operators using IRLP? You really are clutching at straws now. **** off and leave IRLP alone, it does *NOT* interfere with your use of Amateur Radio in anyway what so ever. -- The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to. 73 de Simon, VK3XEM. http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/cli...IENT_NO=157452 VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/ |
Walt Davidson wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:03:42 +1100, Simon VK3XEM wrote: What is there to debate, there is a large network of IRLP nodes all over the world on Amateur Radio which proves it is a popular and valid part of the hobby. There are plenty of CBers all over the world, but that doesn't prove CB is part of amateur radio. 73 de G3NYY You are clutching at straws now, only *LICENSED* Amateur operators can use IRLP, so why bring CB into it. IRLP does *NOT* interfere with your use of Amateur Radio, so **** off and leave it alone! -- The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to. 73 de Simon, VK3XEM. http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/cli...IENT_NO=157452 VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/ |
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"Simon VK3XEM" wrote in message ... Dan/W4NTI wrote: "Brian Reay" wrote in message ... "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Brian Reay wrote: Well, in that case why don't you call it something else. Then come back when someone makes you call it by the name that upsets you. Untill then, 'mellow out'. Dan, why are IRLP fans so quick to tell people to shut up and go away when someone disagrees with them. Are people like you and "concerned amateur" typical of what we might meet if we sample the mode? I don't think anyone is saying "shut up" etc. I'm saying unless ILRP impacts you, why worry? Over the years I've come across many amateurs who hated some aspect of the hobby- packet, anything computer based,........ Not one ever seems to have found a niche they really do like. -- Brian Reay www.g8osn.org.uk www.amateurradiotraining.org.uk FP#898 There you go putting words into my mouth again Brian. I never said I hate IRLP. I said I don't like it being called Ham Radio. And I don't much care if you like my opinion or not. So there. Dan/W4NTI What I don't like is the way you are putting down a legitimate part of the hobby. Whether you like it or not it IS a legitimate part of Amateur Radio. -- The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to. 73 de Simon, VK3XEM. http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/cli...IENT_NO=157452 VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/ You STILL don't get it do you? Try addressing what I am complaining about. Or can't you do so without spinning things way out of wack? ONE MORE TIME;;;;;;IT IS NOT HAM RADIO. IT IS INTERNET CONNECTED TO RADIO. DON'T CALL IT HAM RADIO. Dan/W4NTI You *MUST* be a licensed Amateur to use IRLP, you *MUST* use a radio to access IRLP. Therefore it is getting *LICENSED AMATEURS* on air. It in *NO* way interferes with your on air activities so leave it alone and enjoy your hobby without *INTERFERING* with others. -- The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to. 73 de Simon, VK3XEM. http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/cli...IENT_NO=157452 VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com