Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#121
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... "Actually, what is being discussed is freedom of choice of modes in a hobby in a free society. There is absolutely nothing prohibiting someone who wants to take full advantage of CW's many advantages from becoming skillful in the mode." --- CAM in RRAP Extended to all modes? Get rid of those darn satellite mode questions on the tests! I personally have no use for that! Good point, and I agree. If we are going to have incredibly difficult satellite questions on the Extra written exam, like the following verbatim example..... Q: Which of the following types of communications may space stations transmit? A. Automatic retransmission of signals from Earth stations and other space stations B. One-way communications C. Telemetry consisting of specially coded messages D. All of these choices are correct .....then there ought to be similarly incredibly difficult CW questions on the Extra written exam, like: Q: Which of the following alphanumeric characters corresponds to the Morse sound "di-dah" A. A B. B C. C D. All of these choices are correct After all, fair is fair, and the CW mode ought to have test questions just like all other modes. Thanks for pointing that out. I'll bet you like those schools where the students determine the curriculum! Not at all Mike. You've persuaded me that there ought to be test questions for Morse just like there are test questions for each other mode. We seem to be in complete agreement on the matter. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#122
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dee Flint wrote: "bb" wrote in message ups.com... cl wrote: "bb" wrote in message oups.com... cl wrote: [snip] I disagree. It took a great effort. What is a great effort? Many times it is a matter of perspective. In other words what we expect versus reality may make something seem like a "great effort." It took a big bite out of my life when I should have been paying attention to other things. But I wanted it, so... For some - it may! One argument I've heard, is that those musically inclined pick it up quicker than others, yet I knew some who "were" musically inclined and claimed to have a hell of a time with it. Reason? I don't know. I can't get inside their head. Steve can. He can even have them incarcerated with a simple phone calls. The biggest problem with most is "laziness". Was that your problem? If you hadn't been so lazy you could have learned the code in under a week? Eh - I had the code down in 2 weeks for the Novice exam. AND I'm now an Extra. Been licensed since the early 80s. Yeah, I probably could have learned it in under a week, if I pushed myself. That wasn't my point. My point is that everyone is different, and the length of time it takes to learn 5WPM varies greatly. The time it takes to learn 20WPM could be lifetimes. Not everyone is even capable of 13WPM. Check out the book "The Art and Skill of Radiotelegraphy." Basically anyone without a handicap can master 20wpm with the proper training tools if they are truly motivated to do so. Keep in mind that we all talk faster than that. We even talk faster than that when we spell out words phonetically! When the ARRL advocates telepathy, I'll pay attention. Communication at the speed of thought! Most anyone will tell you - it isn't good to do such. Besides, at that time, I was chasing rug rats - so study time was premium. I've been told that is absolutely no excuse. Nothing in your personal or professional life can be more important than learning the code. No one has ever said that. You're wrong. Larry Roll said that. Many of our regulars either backed him up or were silent. |
#123
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "bb" wrote in message ups.com... When the ARRL advocates telepathy, I'll pay attention. Communication at the speed of thought! Start practicing now, Brian, 30 minutes a day, and you'll be up to 5 WPM in just a few weeks! 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#124
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K=D8HB wrote: "Dee Flint" wrote in message ... We each must choose our activities based on our personal priorities. Thank you very much, Captain Obvious. The "Miss Manners" agenda should be plied on Robeson, not wasted on me. But do not whine and cry to change the requirements simply because it's not high enough on your priority list to put some time into it. I wouldn't characterize it as "whine and cry" (unless I wanted to prejudice the audience). Seems more like "this is my opinion on the matter". Besides if you haven't time to study code 15 minutes per day, you don't have time to study the theory either. Is that kinda like when you told your child "if you haven't got room for more green beans, then you don't have room for dessert either" "You can't have your pudding if you don't eat your meat." As you said, a person must get started to learn anything. The first ones are difficult for all of us. Like anything else it takes time to get good. "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way." ---Bokonon in "Cat's Cradle" "Actually, what is being discussed is freedom of choice of modes in a hobby in a free society. There is absolutely nothing prohibiting someone who wants to take full advantage of CW's many advantages from becoming skillful in the mode." --- CAM in RRAP Sunuvagun! 73, de Hans, K0HB Actual discussion on Morse Testing? Boy does that bring back memories! bb |
#125
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Mike Coslo wrote: K=D8HB wrote: "Dee Flint" wrote in message ... We each must choose our activities based on our personal priorities. Thank you very much, Captain Obvious. But do not whine and cry to change the requirements simply because it's not high enough on your priority list to put some time into it. I wouldn't characterize it as "whine and cry" (unless I wanted to prejudice the audience). Seems more like "this is my opinion on the matter". Besides if you haven't time to study code 15 minutes per day, you don't have time to study the theory either. Is that kinda like when you told your child "if you haven't got room for more green beans, then you don't have room for dessert either" As you said, a person must get started to learn anything. The first ones are difficult for all of us. Like anything else it takes time to get good. "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way." ---Bokonon in "Cat's Cradle" Wow, talk about prejudicing the audience! This assumes that those of us who support Morse testing simply do it because we had to. That is one conclusion. With my problems with it, that would make me the meanest SOB in the valley. The actuarial tables got you a promotion. Perhaps, just perhaps, some of us believe that it is a good idea simply because it is a good idea, a mode that cant be performed by picking up a mic and talking, or typing on a keyboard, and needs to be learned? It the explaining of why it is a good idea where you run into trouble. "Actually, what is being discussed is freedom of choice of modes in a hobby in a free society. There is absolutely nothing prohibiting someone who wants to take full advantage of CW's many advantages from becoming skillful in the mode." --- CAM in RRAP Extended to all modes? Get rid of those darn satellite mode questions on the tests! I personally have no use for that! For a strict appliance operator who is going to buy everything they use and have someone else install it? No one should have to do anything they don't want to do! Ditch all those unneeded questions. The Miccolis argument goes farther. He's advocated dropping all requirements testing. Why don't you go over the deep end, too? Sunuvagun! Huzzanga! - Mike KB3EIA - You can add all the CW quesstions, within reason, that you want. Let CW stand with the other modes in the written test. And drop the code test. |
#126
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K=D8HB wrote: You probably get the drift. =20 73, de Hans, K0HB Don't be so sure. |
#127
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
KØHB wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... "Actually, what is being discussed is freedom of choice of modes in a hobby in a free society. There is absolutely nothing prohibiting someone who wants to take full advantage of CW's many advantages from becoming skillful in the mode." --- CAM in RRAP Extended to all modes? Get rid of those darn satellite mode questions on the tests! I personally have no use for that! Good point, and I agree. If we are going to have incredibly difficult satellite questions on the Extra written exam, like the following verbatim example..... Q: Which of the following types of communications may space stations transmit? A. Automatic retransmission of signals from Earth stations and other space stations B. One-way communications C. Telemetry consisting of specially coded messages D. All of these choices are correct .....then there ought to be similarly incredibly difficult CW questions on the Extra written exam, like: Q: Which of the following alphanumeric characters corresponds to the Morse sound "di-dah" A. A B. B C. C D. All of these choices are correct After all, fair is fair, and the CW mode ought to have test questions just like all other modes. Thanks for pointing that out. I'll bet you like those schools where the students determine the curriculum! Not at all Mike. You've persuaded me that there ought to be test questions for Morse just like there are test questions for each other mode. We seem to be in complete agreement on the matter. Ahh, appearing to agree with me to discount my point! I could ace the entire test if asked is dih-dah meant "A". But that isn't the point. You did of course leave out my point that you can argue yourself out of any testing via your argument...... such as.... Extended to all modes? Get rid of those darn satellite mode questions on the tests! I personally have no use for that! For a strict appliance operator who is going to buy everything they use and have someone else install it? No one should have to do anything they don't want to do! Ditch all those unneeded questions. 0 question test. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#128
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K=D8HB wrote: "bb" wrote in message ups.com... When the ARRL advocates telepathy, I'll pay attention. Communication at the speed of thought! Start practicing now, Brian, 30 minutes a day, and you'll be up to 5 WPM in just a few weeks! =20 73, de Hans, K0HB I can already read Steve's mind at 20WPM. ;^) |
#129
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Alun L. Palmer wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in : cl wrote: which required code. 5 WPM is not impossible to learn. It only takes a few minutes a day and about 2 weeks at least to get enough to pass a test. Took me 45 minutes a day for over 6 months, plus one failed test to get to 5 wpm. I'm all in favor of Morse code testing, but you guys have to show some understanding that it isn't that easy for a lot of people. I aced the writtens, without a whole lot of study by comparison to a lot of people. I don't go around calling them retards or stupid. - Mike KB3EIA - You have a good point Mike. I have seldom had any problems with written exams, but passing a Morse test was hell. Those of us who have had trouble learning Morse have taken a lot of abuse in this group. Dee says otherwise. You hit the nail on the head when you said you wouldn't do the same if someone had trouble with the theory. The only person I've given a hard time about the tests was Bruce/WA8ULX. |
#130
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: Mike Coslo wrote: bb wrote: Mike Coslo wrote: I've heard of some pretty wild times long before things were "dumbed down"! - Mike KB3EIA - Mike, I've been meaning to ask. Are you still sore at me for not giving your grief about the balloon project? HEH! Now you confused me Brian. But seriously, that you *didn't* give me grief was duly noted! I've been stressing over Steve's label of "antagonist" for not giving you grief for some time now. I'm such a terrible person. Hi! Ohh, you know how newsgroups are..... I know how they are, Mike! They're populated by people who don't have the intestinal fortitude to sign their names to their posts and they make up allegations to try and hide behind. Lie #27. You refer to billybeeper as "Brain" and as "Brian." Mike just referred to billybeeper as "Brian." You just need somehting to **** and moan about. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BBC Says Morse Code Still Alive and Well In UK | Policy | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |