Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
notbob wrote:
On 2006-09-23, ken scharf wrote: I would take exception to the "windows" requirement for the PC. They should allow a solution using both "MAC" and "Linux" based PC's especially the later. Evidently, you didn't read this requirement thoroughly. "The software must run on a Windows based PC platform although multi platform support is encouraged." I assume this is to make sure a solution is not done soley on an apple or linux box, thereby leaving out 95% of computer users. I'm a linux user, but let's face it, not including Windoze would exclude way too many people. Not good for promoting ARRL programs. nb Oh I read the requirements. I meant that I didn't agree with them, and I wrote an email to ARRL with that opinion. They replied back to me with your analysis, that they wanted a solution that would be applicable to most computer users, but they also liked the idea of a multi-platform project. Maybe they might open up a category for Linux. The advantage of Linux is that the development tools are free, and Linux will run on any computer that runs windows. You can also install Linux on top of windows (on the same computer anyway) and dual boot, so you can have your cake and eat it too (or have your poison and antidote too in my opinion!). |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
AMATEUR RADIO VOLUNTEERS FILLING COMMUNICATION GAPS IN GULF REGIONfrom today's ARRL Letter | Policy | |||
Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #697 | General | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL's Incoming QSL Burro Screwing NON ARRL members! | Policy |