Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ARRL "Homebrew Challenge"
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:26:24 -0400, "xpyttl"
wrote: "ken scharf" wrote in message . .. The advantage of Linux is that the development tools are free, and Linux will run on any computer that runs windows. Not entirely true. Linux doesn't always have the hardware support, especially on newer boxes. You can also install Linux on top of windows (on the same computer anyway) and dual boot, so you can have your cake and eat it too (or have your poison and antidote too in my opinion!). And why would you? Why would you suffer the complexity and frustration of Linux if Windoze is working just fine for you? Personally, I fully enjoy having Linux servers an Windoze desktops on my home LAN, and with the magic of Cygwin, I can have Linux tools on my Windoze box, and seamless access to my Linux apps, withough fully suffering the clumsy Linux desktop. But that is just me. Most folks want to use the applications, not the OS. Most hams aren't going to write programs, and the features of Linux will be lost on them, but the complexity sure won't. For them, all they want is a little Digipan and email, why on earth would they subject themselves to yet another set of stuff to learn? As far as i can tell, the only ham app on Linux that is better than what is available on Windoze is gEDA. Everything else is harder to use and less capable. Now, I have a lot of ham apps on Linux that I have personally written. These provide me with functions that aren't easily available on Windoze, and the Linux environment makes it much easier. But I'm not most people. Not too many hams are comfortable writing their own applications, or even if they could, that isn't how they enjoy the hobby. For most people, including most hams, Windoze serves the purpose. Everyone has their own set of needs, and one size doesn't fit all. I suspect there may even be some people for whom the Mac is the best answer, although I can't imagine who they might be. But the getting in price for Linux is still pretty high in terms of learning curve, and for most hams, the return is close to zero. So why bother? .. Excellent response. I too have a Linux system on my shack computer dual-booting with Winders. I removed Linux from my main computer as after several months of searching I could never find a decent driver for my video card and wasn't about to buy another card when there was nothing wrong with one I have except there aren't any Linux drivers for it. Plus setting the sucker up is a PITA. Kind of a cross between DOS and Window '98. Finding extensions, plugins, or what ever you may call them is some what like a scavenger hunt and takes a LOT of time and effort. If one takes the time and endures the learning curve the results are often quite good. The system is very stable and works well. 73, Danny, K6MHE |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ARRL "Homebrew Challenge"
Danny Richardson wrote:
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:26:24 -0400, "xpyttl" wrote: "ken scharf" wrote in message ... The advantage of Linux is that the development tools are free, and Linux will run on any computer that runs windows. Not entirely true. Linux doesn't always have the hardware support, especially on newer boxes. You can also install Linux on top of windows (on the same computer anyway) and dual boot, so you can have your cake and eat it too (or have your poison and antidote too in my opinion!). And why would you? Why would you suffer the complexity and frustration of Linux if Windoze is working just fine for you? Personally, I fully enjoy having Linux servers an Windoze desktops on my home LAN, and with the magic of Cygwin, I can have Linux tools on my Windoze box, and seamless access to my Linux apps, withough fully suffering the clumsy Linux desktop. But that is just me. Most folks want to use the applications, not the OS. Most hams aren't going to write programs, and the features of Linux will be lost on them, but the complexity sure won't. For them, all they want is a little Digipan and email, why on earth would they subject themselves to yet another set of stuff to learn? As far as i can tell, the only ham app on Linux that is better than what is available on Windoze is gEDA. Everything else is harder to use and less capable. Now, I have a lot of ham apps on Linux that I have personally written. These provide me with functions that aren't easily available on Windoze, and the Linux environment makes it much easier. But I'm not most people. Not too many hams are comfortable writing their own applications, or even if they could, that isn't how they enjoy the hobby. For most people, including most hams, Windoze serves the purpose. Everyone has their own set of needs, and one size doesn't fit all. I suspect there may even be some people for whom the Mac is the best answer, although I can't imagine who they might be. But the getting in price for Linux is still pretty high in terms of learning curve, and for most hams, the return is close to zero. So why bother? .. Excellent response. I too have a Linux system on my shack computer dual-booting with Winders. I removed Linux from my main computer as after several months of searching I could never find a decent driver for my video card and wasn't about to buy another card when there was nothing wrong with one I have except there aren't any Linux drivers for it. Plus setting the sucker up is a PITA. Kind of a cross between DOS and Window '98. Finding extensions, plugins, or what ever you may call them is some what like a scavenger hunt and takes a LOT of time and effort. If one takes the time and endures the learning curve the results are often quite good. The system is very stable and works well. 73, Danny, K6MHE Those of us that have gone through the trouble of getting there know the rewards of Linux. I agree, it's not something for everyone, but I would think that if you have the brains to get a ham ticket and build your own gear, you can figure it out. Also Ubuntu, Linspire (and Freespire) provide a brainless install that usually just works. As for hardware support, it's much better than it used to be. Almost every sound card chipset found on today's motherboards are supported. Nvidia and Ati both have Linux drivers for their latest video cards (though they are binary drivers and must be downloaded and installed by the end user....complete instructions on the manufacturer's wwebsites). Intel's own graphics chips are supported directly by the kernel. About the only thing I find lacking is Macromedia Flash support for Linux, though there is a GNU project to provide it (gnash). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ARRL "Homebrew Challenge"
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:39:34 -0400, ken scharf
wrote: Danny Richardson wrote: On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:26:24 -0400, "xpyttl" wrote: "ken scharf" wrote in message ... The advantage of Linux is that the development tools are free, and Linux will run on any computer that runs windows. Not entirely true. Linux doesn't always have the hardware support, especially on newer boxes. You can also install Linux on top of windows (on the same computer anyway) and dual boot, so you can have your cake and eat it too (or have your poison and antidote too in my opinion!). And why would you? Why would you suffer the complexity and frustration of Linux if Windoze is working just fine for you? Personally, I fully enjoy having Linux servers an Windoze desktops on my home LAN, and with the magic of Cygwin, I can have Linux tools on my Windoze box, and seamless access to my Linux apps, withough fully suffering the clumsy Linux desktop. But that is just me. Most folks want to use the applications, not the OS. Most hams aren't going to write programs, and the features of Linux will be lost on them, but the complexity sure won't. For them, all they want is a little Digipan and email, why on earth would they subject themselves to yet another set of stuff to learn? As far as i can tell, the only ham app on Linux that is better than what is available on Windoze is gEDA. Everything else is harder to use and less capable. Now, I have a lot of ham apps on Linux that I have personally written. These provide me with functions that aren't easily available on Windoze, and the Linux environment makes it much easier. But I'm not most people. Not too many hams are comfortable writing their own applications, or even if they could, that isn't how they enjoy the hobby. For most people, including most hams, Windoze serves the purpose. Everyone has their own set of needs, and one size doesn't fit all. I suspect there may even be some people for whom the Mac is the best answer, although I can't imagine who they might be. But the getting in price for Linux is still pretty high in terms of learning curve, and for most hams, the return is close to zero. So why bother? .. Excellent response. I too have a Linux system on my shack computer dual-booting with Winders. I removed Linux from my main computer as after several months of searching I could never find a decent driver for my video card and wasn't about to buy another card when there was nothing wrong with one I have except there aren't any Linux drivers for it. Plus setting the sucker up is a PITA. Kind of a cross between DOS and Window '98. Finding extensions, plugins, or what ever you may call them is some what like a scavenger hunt and takes a LOT of time and effort. If one takes the time and endures the learning curve the results are often quite good. The system is very stable and works well. 73, Danny, K6MHE Those of us that have gone through the trouble of getting there know the rewards of Linux. I agree, it's not something for everyone, but I would think that if you have the brains to get a ham ticket and build your own gear, you can figure it out. Also Ubuntu, Linspire (and Freespire) provide a brainless install that usually just works. I really don't want to debate this but will add this comment: I did not find that true with Ubuntu. Try playing videos or mp3s without addding a bunch of stuff after the install. Its not a slam-dunk yet. It really a choice thing and we don't all make the same choices. G very 73, Danny, K6MHE [snip] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ARRL "Homebrew Challenge"
Danny Richardson wrote:
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:39:34 -0400, ken scharf wrote: Danny Richardson wrote: On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:26:24 -0400, "xpyttl" wrote: "ken scharf" wrote in message ... The advantage of Linux is that the development tools are free, and Linux will run on any computer that runs windows. Not entirely true. Linux doesn't always have the hardware support, especially on newer boxes. You can also install Linux on top of windows (on the same computer anyway) and dual boot, so you can have your cake and eat it too (or have your poison and antidote too in my opinion!). And why would you? Why would you suffer the complexity and frustration of Linux if Windoze is working just fine for you? Personally, I fully enjoy having Linux servers an Windoze desktops on my home LAN, and with the magic of Cygwin, I can have Linux tools on my Windoze box, and seamless access to my Linux apps, withough fully suffering the clumsy Linux desktop. But that is just me. Most folks want to use the applications, not the OS. Most hams aren't going to write programs, and the features of Linux will be lost on them, but the complexity sure won't. For them, all they want is a little Digipan and email, why on earth would they subject themselves to yet another set of stuff to learn? As far as i can tell, the only ham app on Linux that is better than what is available on Windoze is gEDA. Everything else is harder to use and less capable. Now, I have a lot of ham apps on Linux that I have personally written. These provide me with functions that aren't easily available on Windoze, and the Linux environment makes it much easier. But I'm not most people. Not too many hams are comfortable writing their own applications, or even if they could, that isn't how they enjoy the hobby. For most people, including most hams, Windoze serves the purpose. Everyone has their own set of needs, and one size doesn't fit all. I suspect there may even be some people for whom the Mac is the best answer, although I can't imagine who they might be. But the getting in price for Linux is still pretty high in terms of learning curve, and for most hams, the return is close to zero. So why bother? .. Excellent response. I too have a Linux system on my shack computer dual-booting with Winders. I removed Linux from my main computer as after several months of searching I could never find a decent driver for my video card and wasn't about to buy another card when there was nothing wrong with one I have except there aren't any Linux drivers for it. Plus setting the sucker up is a PITA. Kind of a cross between DOS and Window '98. Finding extensions, plugins, or what ever you may call them is some what like a scavenger hunt and takes a LOT of time and effort. If one takes the time and endures the learning curve the results are often quite good. The system is very stable and works well. 73, Danny, K6MHE Those of us that have gone through the trouble of getting there know the rewards of Linux. I agree, it's not something for everyone, but I would think that if you have the brains to get a ham ticket and build your own gear, you can figure it out. Also Ubuntu, Linspire (and Freespire) provide a brainless install that usually just works. I really don't want to debate this but will add this comment: I did not find that true with Ubuntu. Try playing videos or mp3s without addding a bunch of stuff after the install. Its not a slam-dunk yet. Ubuntu tries to be a totally free (as in freedom) distro so they don't distribute closed source drivers and plugins by default. As you noticed it's possible but requires user intervention. There are scripts available to do this for your with one click. It really a choice thing and we don't all make the same choices. G very 73, Danny, K6MHE [snip] Yes! choice is good! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
ARRL "Homebrew Challenge"
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:39:34 -0400, ken scharf wrote:
About the only thing I find lacking is Macromedia Flash support for Linux, though there is a GNU project to provide it (gnash). Flash working fine here on Mepis 3.4-3. Even runs my LinkSys WPC54G wireless card when other distros wouldn't. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
ARRL "Homebrew Challenge"
About the only thing I find lacking is Macromedia Flash support for Linux,
though there is a GNU project to provide it (gnash). Flash working fine here on Mepis 3.4-3. Even runs my LinkSys WPC54G wireless card when other distros wouldn't. =================================== Question : Do you run 'Simply Mepis' from a live CD or have you installed that distro on your HD ? 'Simply Mepis' upgrades come hard and fast ; last month the Linux Format magazine's DVD carried version 6.0 Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
ARRL "Homebrew Challenge"
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:56:18 +0100, Highland Ham wrote:
About the only thing I find lacking is Macromedia Flash support for Linux, though there is a GNU project to provide it (gnash). Flash working fine here on Mepis 3.4-3. Even runs my LinkSys WPC54G wireless card when other distros wouldn't. =================================== Question : Do you run 'Simply Mepis' from a live CD or have you installed that distro on your HD ? 'Simply Mepis' upgrades come hard and fast ; last month the Linux Format magazine's DVD carried version 6.0 They shouldn't be coming "hard and fast" from here on out. Mepis is now Debian-based and will follow that distro's roll-out schedule(s). There can be/will be security updates -- which I believe is A Real Good Thing. The updates are done with ease. But new, full releases will appear less often. 'Tis said, as well, that Mepis release's will each now come with "Long Term Support". Dunno what that means in actuality, but I've gotten damn tired of Mandrake deprecating my installations each time I finally get them fully fleshed out, fine tuned, and stable. Then it is upheaval all over again. I will be moving off the Mandrake ("Mandriva" - yeech!) distro (MDK 10.2 on my primary box), and I have recently installed Mepis 6.0 on my 'down-level' box (was MDK 9.1). Mepis 6.0 installed as slick as you'd ever want an install to go. Recommended. Jonesy -- Mikro$oft free since 1991 -- Marvin L Jones | jonz | W3DHJ | linux 38.24N 104.55W | @ config.com | Jonesy | OS/2 *** Killfiling google posts: http//jonz.net/ng.htm |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
ARRL "Homebrew Challenge"
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:56:18 +0100, Highland Ham wrote:
About the only thing I find lacking is Macromedia Flash support for Linux, though there is a GNU project to provide it (gnash). Flash working fine here on Mepis 3.4-3. Even runs my LinkSys WPC54G wireless card when other distros wouldn't. =================================== Question : Do you run 'Simply Mepis' from a live CD or have you installed that distro on your HD ? 'Simply Mepis' upgrades come hard and fast ; last month the Linux Format magazine's DVD carried version 6.0 I originally ran it from a Live CD to test it. It found and set up all of my hardware without any messing about or configuring on my part. After a few days I wiped out Mandrake and installed it to the HD. The only thing I really miss is Midnite Commander...and a partition that got munged when I disregarded previous experience and was bopping back and forth between Partition Magic and QTParted. I could re-write the partion table by hand with a hex editor but it's tedious work and I'm not sure that what's gone is worth the effort. This machine is set up to dual-boot with Win 98, but the only reason I keep it is for one business app that manages my inventory and invoicing. I'm used to the way it works and too lazy to port it over or try to convert it to something else. I have the Mepis 6.0 Live distro but this is working fine. It ain't broke, so I'm not going to "fix" it. But if I decide to build a new laptop with one of those nice 17" screens and a dual-core AMD CPU, that is most likely what will go on it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
ARRL "Homebrew Challenge"
Leroy wrote:
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:39:34 -0400, ken scharf wrote: About the only thing I find lacking is Macromedia Flash support for Linux, though there is a GNU project to provide it (gnash). Flash working fine here on Mepis 3.4-3. Even runs my LinkSys WPC54G wireless card when other distros wouldn't. There are TWO different flash plugins. Macromedia is NOT supported under linux. There is another pluging also called flash that is. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
ARRL "Homebrew Challenge"
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:28:05 -0400, ken scharf wrote:
There are TWO different flash plugins. Macromedia is NOT supported under linux. There is another pluging also called flash that is. The Macromedia flash plugin works fine on my Linux box. You can get it from: http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get...7_linux.tar.gz or with this shorter URL: http://tinyurl.com/prmdd I think it is closed-source, binary only, so it will probably only work with X86 versions of Linux. Note that Macromedia are called Adobe these days. Anyway, thats enough OT for me. This is turning into a Linux advocacy group :-) 73, Ed. EI9GQ. -- Remove 'X' to reply by e-mail Linux 2.6.17 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
AMATEUR RADIO VOLUNTEERS FILLING COMMUNICATION GAPS IN GULF REGIONfrom today's ARRL Letter | Policy | |||
Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #697 | General | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL's Incoming QSL Burro Screwing NON ARRL members! | Policy |