Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 23rd 05, 02:02 AM posted to de.sci.electronics,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design
Joel Kolstad
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Standard parts" for rf amps?

"Joel Kolstad" wrote in message
...
For some of the university work I've done, some of our reference papers are
from people modeling power lines as full-fledged transmission lines that are
many wavelengths long at 50Hz. No simple equivalent circuit model works for
them either!


OK, I did get a little over-excited there -- it should say "that are
significant fractions of a wavelength long," (e.g., more than 1/6th) such that
you can't use a simple circuit model for them.


  #2   Report Post  
Old November 23rd 05, 02:37 AM posted to de.sci.electronics,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,sci.electronics.components,sci.electronics.design
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Standard parts" for rf amps?

Joel Kolstad wrote:
"Joel Kolstad" wrote in message
...

For some of the university work I've done, some of our reference papers are
from people modeling power lines as full-fledged transmission lines that are
many wavelengths long at 50Hz. No simple equivalent circuit model works for
them either!



OK, I did get a little over-excited there -- it should say "that are
significant fractions of a wavelength long," (e.g., more than 1/6th) such that
you can't use a simple circuit model for them.


That's interesting -- SPICE has models for (lossless) transmission
lines, and lines of that length can also be adequately modeled with a
few LC sections. I can imagine line loss could be tricky, though. I've
modeled skin effect loss in the process of designing time-domain
circuits to compensate for delay line loss over a wide time range (and
therefore broad frequency range). But loss due to interaction of the
fields with ground underneath the wires might be more difficult. At
least you've only got one frequency to deal with -- unless harmonic
content is high enough to worry about. Perhaps you've also got to deal
with loss due to radiation?

Roy Lewallen, W7EL


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
this message is for keyclowns selling amps on ebay Keyclowns are limpwristed CB 15 December 15th 05 01:57 AM
Shunt feedback in broadband RF amps [email protected] Homebrew 15 November 1st 05 02:29 AM
Low noise -- op amps K7ITM Homebrew 0 January 7th 05 06:41 PM
Go Amps Go SteveJ CB 13 May 25th 04 02:05 PM
FCC to make CB Amps Legal again! WA3MOJ Policy 2 April 28th 04 04:07 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017