| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote
Most verticals need radials, and the radials must be installed properly 4 r adials are not good practice. My 20 some radial setup was not ideal, but in to diminishing returns. Since I installed them over time, I was able to not ice that the signals were not getting any louder, a rough and ready test of efficiency. But verticals do work. Yes, they do, when properly installed and configured --- according to all I have read. ;-) (I have never used a vertical on HF.) Wasn't it Jerry Sevick who years ago experimented with raised vs. buried radials? My recollection (not to be trusted) is that four *elevated* 1/4 wave radials work well. But if you cannot elevate them and must lay them on the ground or bury them, then you need... a lot of them. I forget if he used 96 or 120 of them.... Of course there are diminishing returns, and Michael's 20-radial arrangement should be plenty adequate - as he demonstrated. In any case, you just have to get the near field to become highly conductive for a vertical to perform as it should. Howard N7SO |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Reflections on good and evil | Shortwave | |||
| Reflections on rrap | Policy | |||
| Reflections on rrap | Policy | |||
| Reflections on rrap | Antenna | |||
| Reflections on rrap | Policy | |||