Menu

Gerritsen Sentenced

Search this Thread

Prev

Previous Post

Next Post

Next

#11

Report Post

Old

September 28th 06, 01:53 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

[email protected] hot-ham-and-cheese@hotmail.com is offline

hot-ham-and-cheese@hotmail.com is offline

external usenet poster

First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006

Posts: 1,554

Default

Convinced Again

wrote:
wrote:
From: on Tues, Sep 26 2006 7:22 pm

wrote:
wrote:

To further that, he feigns some kind of outrage and
demands that the challenger "prove" it by going back
to archives and extracting the challenger's charge.

Brian Burke, N0IMD, claimed that a now-dead person wrote something.
If the now-dead person wrote what Brian claimed, what's the problem
with asking to see the original?

There's nothing wrong with a now-living person asking that question.
There's also nothing wrong with a now-living person from answering as
Heil has - "do your own homework."

who wants to demean
...
with HIS "definition" of "pay,"
that of "being subsidized by the taxpayer."

Why do you think the word "subsidized" is demeaning, Len?

I quoted a definition for "subsidy" from the Webster's New Collegiate
Dictionary:

"a grant to a private person or company to assist an enterprise deemed
advantageous to the public"

A serviceman or woman is not a private person. Nor are they a private
company.

Do you even know what they are?

What is demeaning about that?

What isn't demeaning about it?

"subsidize" is defined in the same book as "to furnish with a subsidy"

So?

Now of course it's clear that someone who is directly employed by the
government is not "a private person or company", so the word doesn't
really apply to anyone who gets a direct government paycheck.

You don't say.

Reply With Quote

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine	N9OGL	Policy	89	April 18th 06 06:16 AM
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine	N9OGL	General	34	December 21st 05 03:03 AM
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine	[email protected]	General	0	December 5th 05 03:22 PM
FCC levies $10,000 fine for unlicensed operation	Mike Terry	Broadcasting	11	January 31st 05 07:43 PM
FCC issues forfeiture order against Jack Gerrittsen, formerly KG6IRO	Splinter	Policy	1	December 14th 04 11:16 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:44 PM.

About Us

"It's about Radio"

Contact Us RadioBanter forum home Privacy Statement

Copyright © 2017