In . com " writes:

But, I digress. Your chief interest seems to be in
trying to destroy the credibility of a not-licensed in
the amateur radio service person (although one who has
been licensed as a Commercial radio operator since
1956). Have you really done that? Are you really
going to nit-pick about an old posting by another and
reference a 1968 Time magazine article? Yes, I'm sure
you really, really WANT to do that! :-)

What an obnoxious quibble. You misquote and falsely accuse Jeffrey
Herman with an absolute statement. One which only a requires a simple
rebuttal that:

- Shows what Jeffrey Herman *really* said.

- Shows convincing, third-party, evidence that supports what Jeffrey
Herman *really* said.

You choose to "rebut" with filibuster and insult, implying that it was
dumb or pedantic to even argue the point, let alone try to find the
supporting evidence. Since you're apparently fond of absolute
statements, here's another one:

No one else, not even your nominal "supporters" here, will post to this
newsgroup and agree with you on your misquote of Jeffrey Herman.
Unless, of course, you want to dig up some sock-puppets, like Avery
Fineman, again.

--
Paul W. Schleck, K3FU

http://www.novia.net/~pschleck/
Finger for PGP Public Key