LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #29   Report Post  
Old January 16th 07, 07:02 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,027
Default One way to promote learning of code ...

wrote:
wrote:
On 15 Jan 2007 17:46:45 -0800, "
wrote:


wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
wrote:

As long as there is a single one out there...

Sigh...that's about the ONLY thing that justifies their mean
way of acting.

How do you justify your behavior here, Len?

How do you justify your behavior here, Dave?

Heil thinks about his rank-title-status and decides he
is "better than anybody" who can't do as "good" as
himself.

Heil is SELF-JUSTIFYING! :-)

he is a soiciopth like most of the extras

hopefully I can soon let some fresh air into that crowd

care to jion me Len?


I can hardly wait for that!


Brian, I've said it before and I'll say it again: My advocacy
was for the elimination of the code test for any US amateur
radio license. Since that is almost a legal fact, I won't be
bothering the happy little in-group of middle-aged-crisis
morse mavens that the moderated group evidences
becoming. I find NO joy in keeping up the farcical fantasy
of amateur radio constantly recreating "pioneer" times in
radio a half century after the actual pioneering...or, worse
yet, their idea that having a radio hobby is somehow
"serving their country." The way that most of the
morsemen act is like the re-enacters of old battles such
as the American Civil War...AS IF they are the "generals"
who - this time - will ensure that the South won, not lost.
:-( [in their minds maybe, but not in reality]

I've found that ALL of electronics ("radio" is a subset of
that) is a fascinating subject and still find it so. By itself.
I don't need some "national organization" to tell me so or
pump up my wish-fulfillment. There's an infinity more yet
to come as the technology continues to evolve. I'll keep
on with that. Those that strive for Control, for putting up a
facade of being "better" at ancient skills, can go have their
opinion orgasms in a tight little enclave of elite "gods of
radio" full of "contests" and exhortations of "mastering"
morse (because they think they did) and all "should" be
nearly as good as they are.

...just waiting for FCC 06-178 to become legal law...



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So who won the "when does NoCode happen" pool? robert casey Policy 115 January 9th 07 12:28 PM
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine Policy 803 January 23rd 04 01:12 AM
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine Shortwave 185 January 6th 04 06:05 PM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 04:23 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017