libel and VE Testing
 

wrote:

Completely meaningless. The "local" VE team could consist of people who
have
to drive 200 miles to administer a VE session.

nice of you to finaly agree to my point the number of Chassel in
meeaningless

meaning Steve was blowing smoke when he brought it up

Quite the opposite. It illustrates the fact concisely that given the low
number of licensed amateurs in your town (19), 1 of which is you and the
other of which is your wife (meaning there are 17 others) and the fact that
statistically only 1/6th of those hams are going to be Extra-class operators
(17 * .16 = 2.8), that means there are not enough licensed extra-class
operators in your town to administer you an examination -- even assuming
100% of those Extra-class operators were also VEs.


Why not lodge a formal complaint with the ARRL VEC regarding this VE
Teams'
actions?

why?

You claim you were discriminated against by evil procoders. If this is true,
wouldn't you want those VEs punished so they couldn't likewise discriminate
against other nocoders in the area?


your word is meaningless then I see

Not at all. Sleet happens. There have been cases locally where VE teams have
called around looking for other VEs to help out at test sessions when one or
more of the VEs scheduled to show up for some reason didn't.


That's correct. A VE team is under no obligation to conduct a session at
the
whim of the testee. A VE team that refuses to conduct a session on the
basis
that the applicants are codeless techs, however, risks having their
credentials pulled by the VEC they work under.

where is that rule you making up Mike

Again, ask the ARRL if they allow their VE teams to discriminate against
codeless techs. I virtually guarentee you such a team would get their
credentials revolked.


Now indeed I am or more properly soon will be

I'm sure the FCC will oh so enjoy attempting to decypher your submittals.

not agin where did I say I was becomeing a VE?

In the same message you said you're getting your extra-class operator
ticket.

Perhaps if you limited yourself to a dozen posts a day rather than 300,
you'd remember what you said.


mike do any besides myself and my wife need to upgrade at all?

Nobody "needs" to upgrade, if they're happen with their operating privileges
in their current form. Some folks are happy with their existing license
class and have no intention on upgrading.


If you do Mark, good for you.

cuting your remark where you claimed in corrtect I had to wiat for
april

always editing the responses to your mistakes Mike

I'm not familiar with the "AES Hamfest" in MI. My source of area VE
examinations is the ARRL web site, which lists upcoming examination sessions
for both the W5YI and ARRL VECs. According to that published data, the only
upcoming session sponsored by the VE team you've libeled is their session in
April.


then your knowledge base is all but non existant and your postion flip
flip almost as fast as John Kerry

If my knowledge base is "all but" non-existant, what's that makes yours?
Negative territory?

Morkie and VE Testing
 

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Mar 11, 12:03 pm, "Dee Flint" wrote:
"KH6HZ" wrote in message

...

wrote:

Dee was an unwitting accomplice in Robesin's plan. She could have
snipped that part out if she had read it and understood what she was
reading.

More rubbish.

Besides it's not my job to edit Steve's posts simply to make other's
happy.

That's easy to say when you are not the target of Robesin's attacks.

I was replying sole to the error.

Which one? Robesin made several.

When I have the time to do some snipping,
I'll do so on longer posts but don't bother on shorter ones as it's not
worth the effort.

Dee, N8UZE

So if Robesin's attacks are short and sweet, you're good with it?


I ignore all attacks by everyone. I refuse to play those games. Any
snippage that I choose to do is to simply shorten the post so the reader
does not have to wade through hundreds of words to get to my comments.

Dee, N8UZE

libel and VE Testing
 

wrote:

then why do you suport and Encourage Robeson et all in doing so?

I'm responsible for what I write. I'm not responsible for what other people
write.


You seem to want to use the concept of "passive acceptance" on everyone.

If that is the case, Mark, I sure hope you spend a lot of time publically
denouncing all the travesties occuring thruout the world -- since, if you do
not, clearly you agree with them.

For example, can you please point out your public posting condemning the
tribal violence in Rwanda? With all the women and children getting hacked to
death, certainly you posted something condemning these deaths.

If you didn't... well, clearly according to the logic you apply to other
people's postings, you support murdering women and children.

VE Testing Rules
 

wrote:

How about this one:

;-^

I'll add it for future reference.


How's that?

That seems to be a very well thought-out list.


Possibly. The problem is that such retesting would
place a burden both on the licensees and the VE
system.

Given that there are many changes to the regulations over the course of 10
years, would it be a tremendous burden to have every ham take a small
examination covering current rules and regulations at the time of renewal?
Not being a VE I cannot say for sure, but I would think the impact would be
fairly minimal on most VE teams. In reality you're talking (on average) 5k
renewals per month spread out over the entire USA.


Actually it's quite rare. But it's certainly a lot
more common than such violations by young amateurs.

Well, I didn't mean amateurs, I was referring more to how old people seem to
get bitter with age.


He *chose* to wait all those years.

One has to wonder (if even for a brief moment) why you would purposely deny
yourself years of enjoyment.

My level of activity in ham radio varies depending on my parental
obligations. With the birth of my 3rd in '98 I found I had almost no time by
2000. Now that he is 8, I find I have more time as he begins to assert his
independence and my other two are into their teens.

As my life proceeds, I may experience various levels of active/inactivity,
but I'll always have a ham ticket to enjoy.

73
kh6hz

VE Testing Rules
 

wrote:

Given that there are many changes to the regulations over the course of 10
years, would it be a tremendous burden to have every ham take a small
examination covering current rules and regulations at the time of renewal?
Not being a VE I cannot say for sure, but I would think the impact would
be
fairly minimal on most VE teams. In reality you're talking (on average) 5k
renewals per month spread out over the entire USA.

some bruden certainly but the idea certainly has merit and something
like has figured in my coment and letter to the FCC over the years

The regulations can change so much in a decade, I really do not think it is
a major burden to have a licensed ham take a small examination covering
topical material which has changed over the past decade. This would help
ensure our "pool of trained radio operators" are knowledgable about all the
latest rules, regs, etc.


is that something you personaly empathize with?

I'm busy enjoying life and ham radio. I made 2 contacts late this morning
before I started working on my motorcycle engine rebuild project. How 'bout
you?

Morkie and VE Testing
 

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Mar 10, 1:02 pm, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 10, 11:07 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 10, 12:15 am, "Dee Flint" wrote:
wrote in message
egroups.com...
On Mar 9, 9:53 pm, "Mork" Dork@anon wrote:
[snip]
So less than two dozen ( 24) amateurs aren't enough to make up a
VE
team? That IS news to me.
If the numbers presented earlier were correct, it would not matter
if they
were all VEs. They could not have tested Mark since only one of
them held a
license class higher than General. To conduct a General license
exam, they
must hold either an Advanced or Extra license.
Dee is a cheerleader for Morse Code and the ARRL. That's known as
"bias."
My support of Morse code has no bearing on the number of VEs in
Mark's area
who are eligible to administer the General exam.
Dee, N8UZE
Fair enough.
I was just disgusted by your legitimizing Robesin's sexual inuendo
and
accusations that Mark's wife is a man.
That is all.
I sometimes get the feeling that you're about as peculiarly wired as
Mark.
Sometimes? Don't hold back. What do you think of me the rest of the
time?

I wasn't writing about the rest of the time. I expressed my view
concisely.

Nothing was said about your inability to express a view concisely.
And I asked for you to cover all of the bases.

Since you've asked: Much of the time, you write like an
insecure fellow with a chip on his shoulder.

See? I knew you could do it. All it took was a little gentle
coaxing.

There have been occasions
though, when you've posted something in a fairly rational manner.

To ascribe some sinister motivation to Dee Flint is at best, absurd.

Dee was an unwitting accomplice in Robesin's plan. She could have
snipped that part out if she had read it and understood what she was
reading.
And then your butt-buddy Mark would have accused her of post editing.
You are becomming as bizarre as Mark.

libel and VE Testing
 

wrote in message
s.com...
On Mar 11, 5:01 am, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote:
nope it is becuase I did not yeaild to the blackmail of Steve J
robeson 9 years agao

Blackmail is a very serious crime. One has to wonder why the Houghton
County
Prosecuting Attorney didn't haul Steve in 8.5 years ago...

Robesin has an attorney on retainer - gratis.

Then he started guessing who the attorney's new bride was sleeping
with, right here on RRAP.

I wonder if Robesin will be well represented by such an attorney who
offers to work for free then suffers Robesin's insults?

With Robesin, it's always about the wives...

And with you and your socially dysfunctional buddy Mark, it's always about
Robesin.

VE Testing Rules
 

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Mar 10, 8:32 pm, "Dean M" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...

On Mar 10, 11:29 am, "Dean M" wrote:

How's that report on me going. Should be at least 500 words double
spaced

The report was completed back when I said I made it.

I so doubt that. You're all bluster like your trainer

I so don't care. But here's an interesting little factoid so that
you'll sleep better at night:

You asked for my State's Attorney General and I gave his info to you,
but I had merely reported you to your ISP.

You jump to conclusions then harass me when the AG office doesn't
check on you. What an idiot.

Awwww....did you go crying to somebody's ISP? Poor baby.
That is so Wiseman of you.

Morkie and VE Testing
 

"KH6HZ" wrote in message
...
wrote:

Dee was an unwitting accomplice in Robesin's plan. She could have
snipped that part out if she had read it and understood what she was
reading.

More rubbish.

Since there are several states which allow same-sex marriages, it is not
outside the realm of possibility that Mark's 'wife' is male.

I also think that the majority of the legitimately signed participants
here
could care less one way or the other if Mark's wife is male, female, or a
holstein cow.

(Do we get to take a vote? I vote number 3.)

libel and VE Testing
 

wrote in message
ups.com...
On Mar 11, 4:52 am, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote:
I spuse I confused stave when I said Local as oposed to
houghton/hancock area

and mike just followed suit

Not at all. You're the one who claims Steve "lied".

Steve made a factual statement, as did I. There are 19 licensed amateurs
in
Chasell. That is not a "lie". Anyone can go to QRZ and see for
themselves

How many licensed amateurs are in Hermann's PO Box? Where should they
be?

Do what Steve did. Research it yourself.

libel and VE Testing
 

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 09:16:20 -0400, "KH6HZ" wrote:

wrote:

Dee was an unwitting accomplice in Robesin's plan. She could have
snipped that part out if she had read it and understood what she was
reading.

More rubbish.

Since there are several states which allow same-sex marriages, it is not
outside the realm of possibility that Mark's 'wife' is male.

why is it your affair

I also think that the majority of the legitimately signed participants
here
could care less one way or the other if Mark's wife is male, female, or a
holstein cow.

now you are realy geting insulting Mike

Poor Morkie. He is so "insulted". Maybe you can make some cruel remarks
about Mike's daughter, too.

Libel and VE Testing
 

wrote in message
...
On 11 Mar 2007 06:27:11 -0700, wrote:

On Mar 11, 4:55 am, "KH6HZ" wrote:
"Dee Flint" wrote:
I was thinking more along the lines of irate applicants posing a
threat to
the Volunteer Examiners.

I stand corrected.

Wouldn't that be a good reason for VEs to "pack heat"?

The RF Commando's will deal with any such issues!

amazing how fast he and steve get to tlaking about guns

And even more amazing is how you always get to talking about Steve. Do you
keep a photo of him atop your rigs?

Morkie and VE Testing
 

On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:43:14 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:39:49 -0400, "Dee Flint"

I ignore all attacks by everyone.

i contiue to take part in them myslef

I refuse to play those games.

"lessor hams soldat Piggly Wiggly"
Any
snippage that I choose to do is to simply shorten the post so the reader
does not have to wade through hundreds of words to get to my comments.

i choose and you are responible for my choices Dee

Very odd writings indeed. Why are you stlaking Dee?

Stalking Steve
 

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 13:35:06 -0000, "Dean M" wrote:


wrote in message
roups.com...
On Mar 10, 8:32 pm, "Dean M" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...

On Mar 10, 11:29 am, "Dean M" wrote:

How's that report on me going. Should be at least 500 words double
spaced

The report was completed back when I said I made it.

I so doubt that. You're all bluster like your trainer

I so don't care. But here's an interesting little factoid so that
you'll sleep better at night:

You asked for my State's Attorney General and I gave his info to you,
but I had merely reported you to your ISP.


Oh my gosh gee whiz there Bry You stated previously that you reported
this
to the Ohio AG. Now you back pedal and state you reported to my ISP.

you lack any sense of time don't you?

Which
one is the truth there Bry?

which moment of time are you asking about

Taking lessions from Marcus Stupideous I C.

No problem, My ISP, if indeeed I am posting from them gave you comlaint
the
same weight and thoght as I imagine the Ohio AG did NONE!!!! ha ha he he

You make me raff


You jump to conclusions then harass me when the AG office doesn't
check on you. What an idiot.

How can you be harrassed in a public forum there BRY?

by being harrassed

No one forces you to
read anything, no one forces you you to reply.

no one forces people out in public where they can be harrassed either
and yet they can be harrassed


Hey Bry could be a new Batman villian... Bluster Man a villian who
attempts to defaet his enemies with lies, inneuendo and various blustery
phrases

that fellow already exist His secert is ID is Steven J Robeson

More Morkie stalking, I see.

libel and VE Testing
 

wrote in message
...
On 11 Mar 2007 07:06:22 -0700, wrote:

On Mar 11, 9:16 am, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote:
Dee was an unwitting accomplice in Robesin's plan. She could have
snipped that part out if she had read it and understood what she was
reading.

More rubbish.

Since there are several states which allow same-sex marriages, it is
not
outside the realm of possibility that Mark's 'wife' is male.

Is Michigan one of those states?

no and it has laws forbiding the legal reconition of same sex marragie
s and has amended it's constitution to that effect

You need to check your facts before
running your mouth.

he like steve never lets facts get in the way of what he wants

Oh, my. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black....

libel and VE Testing
 

"Dean M" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:25:35 -0000, "Dean M" wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 09:11:28 -0400, "KH6HZ" wrote:
If you feel there is adequate demand for more than 2 test sessions per
year
in Chasell, then you're welcome to take the requisite examinations,
obtain
VE certifications, and form your own VE team.

Now indeed I am or more properly soon will be


You can't even read at a 1st grade level without screwing up.

interesting fantasy you have

How the hell
are you going to be able to grade papers without making mistakes.

it is easyenough in college I used to get paid to do that


I'm sorry, you didn't pass but you got 45 out of 35 wrong.

get some therapy

Don't argue with
me..I have a 249 IQ and was a commissioned, yet drafted officer in the
CSA
Chemical Corpse

gee I never read about any serious WMD program of the south

I still love the part how ytou were a Drafted Officer in the military.
That
is great stuff. Where do you get your material Marcus?





Know give me another $14 and shut up Just remember EVA A MA I and now
what's what

you like posting such crap on purpose how do you expeect to be taken
seriously?

or do you?

I can guess the ARRL will not have anything to do with you

you assume i want something to do with THEM

I can imagine
that Fred will be happy to take you money to make you a VE right up
until
the first complaint from a person taking a test who is unhappy with how
you
run things

I doubt Fred would have any cuase to complain

but I have never expressed any real intent to become a VE

EXSQUEEZE ME!!! Read the following qute from this very post..a quote
from
a post YOU made in regards to becoming a VE/VEC

If you feel there is adequate demand for more than 2 test sessions per
year
in Chasell, then you're welcome to take the requisite examinations,
obtain
VE certifications, and form your own VE team.

Now indeed I am or more properly soon will be

You are an "idoit" Marcus

And a liar, as well.

Morkie and VE Testing
 

"Larry" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:43:14 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:39:49 -0400, "Dee Flint"

I ignore all attacks by everyone.

i contiue to take part in them myslef

I refuse to play those games.

"lessor hams soldat Piggly Wiggly"
Any snippage that I choose to do is to simply shorten the post so the
reader does not have to wade through hundreds of words to get to my
comments.

i choose and you are responible for my choices Dee

Very odd writings indeed. Why are you stlaking Dee?

I pity anyone who is not responsible for their own choices. It must truly
be hell to be at the mercy of everyone in the world.

Dee, N8UZE

Morkie and VE Testing
 

"Dee Flint" wrote in message
. ..

"KH6HZ" wrote in message
...
wrote:

Dee was an unwitting accomplice in Robesin's plan. She could have
snipped that part out if she had read it and understood what she was
reading.

More rubbish.



Besides it's not my job to edit Steve's posts simply to make other's
happy.
I was replying sole to the error. When I have the time to do some
snipping,
I'll do so on longer posts but don't bother on shorter ones as it's not
worth the effort.

Dee, N8UZE

Oh, my. Now you did it again. You called him "Morkie". No, not directly, but
in the message topic. Mark will twist that for sure.
Of course had you changed the topic line, he'd have whined that you hijacked
the thread.
It is best to never again deal with Mark, Dee. He is our "professional
victim", if you've not already discerned that for yourself.

Morkie and VD Testing
 

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Mar 11, 12:03 pm, "Dee Flint" wrote:
"KH6HZ" wrote in message

...

wrote:

Dee was an unwitting accomplice in Robesin's plan. She could have
snipped that part out if she had read it and understood what she was
reading.

More rubbish.

Besides it's not my job to edit Steve's posts simply to make other's
happy.

That's easy to say when you are not the target of Robesin's attacks.

I was replying sole to the error.

Which one? Robesin made several.

When I have the time to do some snipping,
I'll do so on longer posts but don't bother on shorter ones as it's not
worth the effort.

Dee, N8UZE

So if Robesin's attacks are short and sweet, you're good with it?


My, how you whine. Mark is no longer the only one in this group that sounds
like a petulant six year old.

libel and VD Testing
 

wrote in message
ups.com...
On Mar 10, 5:37 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote:
A quick search of Chassel, MI shows 19 licensed amateurs, 1 of which
you
live with.

so?

You can't claim someone "lied" simply because their figures are
different.

You can't? Tell that to Jim.

Mark does. And he accuses them of "stlaking" as an added bonus.

Morkie and VE Testing
 

"Morkie" anon@anon wrote in message ...

"Dee Flint" wrote in message
. ..

"KH6HZ" wrote in message
...
wrote:

Dee was an unwitting accomplice in Robesin's plan. She could have
snipped that part out if she had read it and understood what she was
reading.

More rubbish.



Besides it's not my job to edit Steve's posts simply to make other's
happy.
I was replying sole to the error. When I have the time to do some
snipping,
I'll do so on longer posts but don't bother on shorter ones as it's not
worth the effort.

Dee, N8UZE

Oh, my. Now you did it again. You called him "Morkie". No, not directly,
but
in the message topic. Mark will twist that for sure.
Of course had you changed the topic line, he'd have whined that you
hijacked
the thread.
It is best to never again deal with Mark, Dee. He is our "professional
victim", if you've not already discerned that for yourself.



I've known this for a very long time and never respond to him. He is on my
blocked senders list. Although I clean the list out now and then, he gets
put right back on it.

Dee, N8UZE

Morkie and VD Testing
 

"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...

"Larry" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:43:14 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:39:49 -0400, "Dee Flint"

I ignore all attacks by everyone.

i contiue to take part in them myslef

I refuse to play those games.

"lessor hams soldat Piggly Wiggly"
Any snippage that I choose to do is to simply shorten the post so the
reader does not have to wade through hundreds of words to get to my
comments.

i choose and you are responible for my choices Dee

Very odd writings indeed. Why are you stlaking Dee?

I pity anyone who is not responsible for their own choices. It must truly
be hell to be at the mercy of everyone in the world.

Dee, N8UZE

As I said previously. Morkie is our resident, perpetual victim.
(whisper, nudge-nudge He ain't all there, ya know.)

VE Testing Rules
 

From: on Sun, Mar 11 2007 5:14 am

On Mar 10, 9:59 pm, wrote:

Jim, get over yourself. The story presented in QST is preposterous.
Only you believed it.

He CANNOT, Brian...:-) He's been dogging this one since 1999
and it must be eating him out internally. It's his own
albatross hung around his neck...and that ancient mariner
just can't make it all rhyme.

For example, Jimmie thinks that "AF6AY" wrote a comment to
the FCC in 1998 (accepted on FCC 98-143 on 13 Jan 99) but
that is clearly WRONG. Callsign AF6AY wasn't even close on
the sequential callsign list back then. Jimmie was first
licensed in US amateur radio at age 14 so he bridles at any
mention, even suggestions that a minimum age be set at 14.
Jimmie is a champion of OOK CW morse code and gets upset
when others don't think that is "important." Jimmie gets
all upset when others don't worship St. Hiram and all the
things that are old in ham radio. Sigh...

I replied to Jim Weir of Grass Valley, CA, and a former
Primary candidate for Governor of California. Jimmie
Miccolis of Pennsylvania has never run for any government
elected position and certainly never served in the military.
But, Jimmie runs his newsgroup "transceiver" at "full break-
in" whenever he hears my "signal." :-)

It be QRM, with heavy QRN on top of it.

73, Len AF6AY

VE Testing Rules
 

From: on Sun, Mar 11 2007 8:34 am


And even when AF6AY pointed out the story to
FCC in his Reply Comments to 98-143, FCC still
believed it.

Sweetums, NOBODY with the callsign AF6AY replied to FCC 98-143
on, before, or after 13 Jan 99. It wasn't issued yet. :-)


There have been other verified stories about
young amateurs. Since 2000, a six-year-old has
passed the General, and a seven-year-old has
passed the Extra. Both stories in QST.
FCC had no problem believing either.

In fact that seven-year-old broke the previous record,
held by an eight-year-old who passed the old pre-2000
Extra, complete with 20 wpm code and five written tests.

All those young amateurs still have their licenses. They
haven't gotten into any problems with FCC.

Wonderful. I'll just think of all you worshippers
of St. Hiram as pre-teeners, mentality and reasoning
"maturity" to match... :-)

Now, just WHY are you continuing your "age limit"
diatribe past the 8 year and 2 months time of that
particular Comment on an NPRM that got settled by
a Report and Order?

Is it the usual "nyah, nyah" to be followed by a
call to mommy by all you mental pre-teeners?

Quit sucking your thumb on that theme...

LA

VE Testing Rules
 

On Mar 11, 2:13 pm, "Dean M" wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 11 Mar 2007 10:27:30 -0700, wrote:
On Mar 11, 10:38 am, "Dean M" wrote:
wrote in message
egroups.com...
On Mar 11, 9:35 am, "Dean M" wrote:
wrote in message
groups.com...
On Mar 10, 8:32 pm, "Dean M" wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Mar 10, 11:29 am, "Dean M" wrote:

How's that report on me going. Should be at least 500 words
double
spaced

The report was completed back when I said I made it.

I so doubt that. You're all bluster like your trainer

I so don't care. But here's an interesting little factoid so that
you'll sleep better at night:

You asked for my State's Attorney General and I gave his info to
you,
but I had merely reported you to your ISP.

Oh my gosh gee whiz there Bry You stated previously that you
reported
this
to the Ohio AG.

No. You jumped to a conclusion because you're a paranoid little
freak. I let you work under a false assumption all this time.

I did HHmmmm

Yep. You did. Are you now admitting to harassing behavio[u]r?

This post from your stubby little fingered keyboard sez you're
wrong

Nope, it proves I'm right.

indeeed unless (after the quoted message

I hope this guys doesn't play with sharps.

Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
From:
Date: 10 Feb 2007 18:52:28 -0800
Local: Sun, Feb 11 2007 2:52 am
Subject: Schlecks' Schlock!
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Feb 10, 11:38 am, "Dean M" wrote:

why? don;t you like getting male

"Getting male?" Are you a pervert?

Suspicious US mail is opened by the postal inspector.

Suspicious packages from other carriers get opened by the Sheriff.

Harassing emails are both forwarded to the state attorney general, and
printed and mailed to the attorney general.

Your stalking is now documented. Proceed at your own risk. Best of
Luck.

Note the mention of attorney general at least twice

I see what I wrote. Do you see what I wrote?

.....did dean send you harrassing email?

nope, wouldn't waste the time, besides, a private e-mail wuldn't allow
everyone else the ability to see good ol Mr Bluster in action

It is Mr Riff-Ralph's actions that are so amusing. He probably broke
a sweat jumping to conclusions.

Whay have fun with invitations all around to join in watching the Circus
side show. It's more fun to see "superior intellect" with a group than a
one on one, even if that's your sort of thin

Whay what? What sort of thin?

if did then you did or did forward and report him or then maybe you
could be lying

definitely the former and complete true about the latter, or is it the other
way around. Either case, Ol Phineas T was all bluster or as you'll say, he
am a lier

he's not the notorious Batman villian Mr Bluster for nothing

Mr. Riff-Ralph refuses to accept that he's been played.

Now you back pedal and state you reported to my ISP. Which
one is the truth there Bry? Taking lessions from Marcus Stupideous I
C.

No backpedalling. I'm just not responsible for how your freaky little
mind works.

Backpedaliing. Classic example Now you'll refute

No backpedalling. See what I wrote. Understand what I wrote. Then
compare it to your actions.

No problem, My ISP, if indeeed I am posting from them gave you
comlaint
the
same weight and thoght as I imagine the Ohio AG did NONE!!!! ha ha
he he

I never contacted the AG's office. You made that assumption up all by
yourself.

See above

Yep. I see above. Do you see above?

Oh that's right You're Bluster Man.

I am? I've never claimed to be him.

Say one thing but don't do another.

Huh? It's supposed to be, "Say one thing but DO another."

Kinda like when monkeys bear their teeth in an attempt to bluster
their way out of a situation.

Monkey's "bare" "thier" teeth.

Are you bearing your teeth right now Bluster
Man??

Am I, Mr. Riff-Ralph?

You make me raff

You make yourself riff and raff.

You jump to conclusions then harass me when the AG office doesn't
check on you. What an idiot.

How can you be harrassed in a public forum there BRY? No one forces
you
to
read anything, no one forces you you to reply. Taking lessons from
thae
ither trained monkey Marcus Idiotous I C

You you make all kinds of assumptions. Too bad for you.

You continue to operate under false assumptions. Too bad for you.

and blame others for his mistakes

Sorry Marcus Ridiculous , we can't all emulate you and be Professional
Victims

You're just too stupid to understand that you're a victim of your own
making.

Feel free to report me to the FCC as well there Bry. I am sure
they'll
give
you the same consideration as the others

Nah. I'll wait for you to really screw up, then... "Dialing..."

You very funny man, you make me raff or on this case ralph

So now you're claiming to be Riff-Ralph? How appropriate.

That's you're claim Phineas T.

Awww. You act stupid and now it's my fault?

of course it is juist like with Robeson

To a "T."

Ta ta Turtle man give my regards to the rest of the Bizzaro people

Hey Bry could be a new Batman villian... Bluster Man a villian who
attempts to defaet his enemies with lies, inneuendo and various
blustery
phrases

Maybe you should go back to Michigan there Bry, I am sure Marcus
Deviatous
would puit you up

It's been fun Have a week

Sayonara Mr. Riff-Ralph.

Sayonara Mr. Rfff-Ralph.

too bad we can't realy say goodbye to his ilk

You could, trying putting your head in the oven, playing with a loaded gun,
catching moving cars out on the freeway. There are loads of ways for you to
say good bye

Please feel to try several until you succeed

Sayonara, Mr. Riff-Ralph.

VE Testing Rules
 

On Mar 11, 2:18 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:13:04 -0000, "Dean M" wrote:

nope, wouldn't waste the time, besides, a private e-mail wuldn't allow
everyone else the ability to see good ol Mr Bluster in action

then there is no reason to believe he forwarded nonexistentat email to
the AG
flush

Dean M isn't very bright.

Libel and VE Testing
 

On Mar 11, 3:32 pm, "Morkie" anon@anon wrote:
wrote in message

...

On 11 Mar 2007 06:27:11 -0700, wrote:

On Mar 11, 4:55 am, "KH6HZ" wrote:
"Dee Flint" wrote:
I was thinking more along the lines of irate applicants posing a
threat to
the Volunteer Examiners.

I stand corrected.

Wouldn't that be a good reason for VEs to "pack heat"?

The RF Commando's will deal with any such issues!

amazing how fast he and steve get to tlaking about guns

And even more amazing is how you always get to talking about Steve. Do you
keep a photo of him atop your rigs?

No need to.
http://hometown.aol.com/k4yz/myhomepage/profile.html

libel and VE Testing
 

"Morkie" anon@anon wrote:

Oh, my. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black....

Perhaps he can remind the group about my "12 vanity callsigns".

VE Testing Rules
 

wrote:

their are question are you proposing changing to int he other pools as
well like require this rules pool and element 2 for techs (and then
wed like pull the ruls questions of element 3 and 4)

I'm not sure if there needs to be a separate question pool. Perhaps a 10 or
20 question exam pulled from the rules and regs in the appropriate pool
you're renewing in (e.g. extra renewals would pull questions from the
rules/regs section, etc.)

libel and VE Testing
 

wrote:

and yet you hold ME responsble for the actions of other I only seek to
hold you to the same standards as you hold me

Who others do I hold you responsible for? I hold you responsible for your
own postings.


but since I did and do denouce

Can i have the message id of the posting?

libel and VE Testing
 

wrote:

how? since I never made anyclaim th e VE team was lcoal to chassell

they can indeed as gruop break their word to memebers of the CCARS
about scheduling addtional test session upon request

not the same issue

not according to Summner with whom it has come up in passing during a
set of email we have been exchanging over the last few months
He stated something like they can shce a session or based on any whim
they like


In the same message you said you're getting your extra-class operator
ticket.

no I said no such thing

Ok, I guess I misunderstood, I thought you were getting an Extra-class
ticket at the AES Hamfest.


I said i was NOW eleible to be not that I was going to become one

That's too bad. It would seem the local nocoders would be happy to be free
from the clutches of those nasty procoder VE teams.


again I haven't made 300 post in 24 hours Mike

In the first 11 days of March 2007, you've posted 550 messages according to
Google.

Can we say "obsessed"?


then why did you bring it up?

You did, with your claims of being unable to upgrade due to the actions of
procoders.


according Steve and I believe yourself it isn't lible if it is true

Let's see how George feels about that.


further why am I required to deal with the local team

Most people like to deal with a local team, because it is closer, more
convenient, etc., however, there is no requirement you do so.


bigger than yours

If you're talking about your level of obsession with RRAP, I agree.

Libel and VE Testing
 

"Morkie" anon@anon wrote:

And even more amazing is how you always get to talking about Steve. Do you
keep a photo of him atop your rigs?

Probably on their nightstand next to their bottle of hand lotion.

libel and VE Testing
 

wrote:

You have stated I am respoble for steve posting about my personal life
here on RRAP and presumly by extention all the annymouses doing the
same

Nope. That's not what I said. What I said was: if you put aspects of your
private life into USENET (read: public) forums, they become legitmate
topics of discussion.


when you hack so much I am sure the message you are referring to so
the answer is NO

In other words, you never posted a message denouncing the violence against
women in Rwanda.

Therefore, using Morgan-logic, we are to conclude that you support hacking
women and children to death with machetes.

libel and VE Testing
 

"KH6HZ" wrote:


not according to Summner with whom it has come up in passing during a
set of email we have been exchanging over the last few months
He stated something like they can shce a session or based on any whim
they like

Can I have a copy of this letter?

As an ARRL Life Member, it concerns me greatly that the League would support
discriminating against any license class.

libel and VE Testing
 

wrote:

no the exact terms of our text of our conversation is something he
asked me not to disclose since we are being VERY frank with each
other, if I dislclosed it further I fear he would nto be as candid as
he has been

In other words, it never happened. Just as I suspected.

VE Testing Rules
 

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Mar 11, 2:13 pm, "Dean M" wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 11 Mar 2007 10:27:30 -0700, wrote:
On Mar 11, 10:38 am, "Dean M" wrote:
wrote in message
egroups.com...
On Mar 11, 9:35 am, "Dean M" wrote:
wrote in message
groups.com...
On Mar 10, 8:32 pm, "Dean M" wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Mar 10, 11:29 am, "Dean M" wrote:

How's that report on me going. Should be at least 500 words
double
spaced

The report was completed back when I said I made it.

I so doubt that. You're all bluster like your trainer

I so don't care. But here's an interesting little factoid so
that
you'll sleep better at night:

You asked for my State's Attorney General and I gave his info to
you,
but I had merely reported you to your ISP.

Oh my gosh gee whiz there Bry You stated previously that you
reported
this
to the Ohio AG.

No. You jumped to a conclusion because you're a paranoid little
freak. I let you work under a false assumption all this time.

I did HHmmmm

Yep. You did. Are you now admitting to harassing behavio[u]r?

This post from your stubby little fingered keyboard sez you're
wrong

Nope, it proves I'm right.

indeeed unless (after the quoted message

I hope this guys doesn't play with sharps.

Nope, but if I did, I wouild have the proper disposal containers



Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
From:
Date: 10 Feb 2007 18:52:28 -0800
Local: Sun, Feb 11 2007 2:52 am
Subject: Schlecks' Schlock!
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Feb 10, 11:38 am, "Dean M" wrote:

why? don;t you like getting male

"Getting male?" Are you a pervert?

Suspicious US mail is opened by the postal inspector.

Suspicious packages from other carriers get opened by the Sheriff.

Harassing emails are both forwarded to the state attorney general,
and
printed and mailed to the attorney general.

Your stalking is now documented. Proceed at your own risk. Best of
Luck.

Note the mention of attorney general at least twice

I see what I wrote. Do you see what I wrote?

.....did dean send you harrassing email?

nope, wouldn't waste the time, besides, a private e-mail wuldn't allow
everyone else the ability to see good ol Mr Bluster in action

It is Mr Riff-Ralph's actions that are so amusing. He probably broke
a sweat jumping to conclusions.

Not at all. You are really no challenge there Bluster Man




Whay have fun with invitations all around to join in watching the Circus
side show. It's more fun to see "superior intellect" with a group than a
one on one, even if that's your sort of thin

Whay what? What sort of thin?

You know..Lucy, I have a thin to discuss wit you That sort of thin

You're pretty thick whenj it comes to play on word games there Phineas T



if did then you did or did forward and report him or then maybe you
could be lying

definitely the former and complete true about the latter, or is it the
other
way around. Either case, Ol Phineas T was all bluster or as you'll say,
he
am a lier

he's not the notorious Batman villian Mr Bluster for nothing

Mr. Riff-Ralph refuses to accept that he's been played.

Actually there Bry, you've been played, flayed and fried



Now you back pedal and state you reported to my ISP. Which
one is the truth there Bry? Taking lessions from Marcus
Stupideous I
C.

No backpedalling. I'm just not responsible for how your freaky
little
mind works.

Backpedaliing. Classic example Now you'll refute

No backpedalling. See what I wrote. Understand what I wrote. Then
compare it to your actions.

No problem, My ISP, if indeeed I am posting from them gave you
comlaint
the
same weight and thoght as I imagine the Ohio AG did NONE!!!! ha
ha
he he

I never contacted the AG's office. You made that assumption up all
by
yourself.

See above

Yep. I see above. Do you see above?

Oh that's right You're Bluster Man.

I am? I've never claimed to be him.

Say one thing but don't do another.

Huh? It's supposed to be, "Say one thing but DO another."

Kinda like when monkeys bear their teeth in an attempt to bluster
their way out of a situation.

Monkey's "bare" "thier" teeth.

Are you bearing your teeth right now Bluster
Man??

Am I, Mr. Riff-Ralph?

You make me raff

You make yourself riff and raff.

You jump to conclusions then harass me when the AG office
doesn't
check on you. What an idiot.

How can you be harrassed in a public forum there BRY? No one
forces
you
to
read anything, no one forces you you to reply. Taking lessons
from
thae
ither trained monkey Marcus Idiotous I C

You you make all kinds of assumptions. Too bad for you.

You continue to operate under false assumptions. Too bad for you.

and blame others for his mistakes

Sorry Marcus Ridiculous , we can't all emulate you and be Professional
Victims

You're just too stupid to understand that you're a victim of your own
making.

You're comfusing me with your trainer, the Professional Victim Marcus
Cantspellicus



Feel free to report me to the FCC as well there Bry. I am sure
they'll
give
you the same consideration as the others

Nah. I'll wait for you to really screw up, then... "Dialing..."

You very funny man, you make me raff or on this case ralph

So now you're claiming to be Riff-Ralph? How appropriate.

That's you're claim Phineas T.

Awww. You act stupid and now it's my fault?

of course it is juist like with Robeson

To a "T."

Ta ta Turtle man give my regards to the rest of the Bizzaro
people

Hey Bry could be a new Batman villian... Bluster Man a villian
who
attempts to defaet his enemies with lies, inneuendo and various
blustery
phrases

Maybe you should go back to Michigan there Bry, I am sure Marcus
Deviatous
would puit you up

It's been fun Have a week

Sayonara Mr. Riff-Ralph.

Sayonara Mr. Rfff-Ralph.

too bad we can't realy say goodbye to his ilk

You could, trying putting your head in the oven, playing with a loaded
gun,
catching moving cars out on the freeway. There are loads of ways for you
to
say good bye

Please feel to try several until you succeed

I think some complaints to your ISP for TOS violations are in order. Yes,
that's the ticket
Posting on a newsgroup using other than your real e-mail address...guess
you're screwed there Bluster Man



Sayonara, Mr. Riff-Ralph.
Ta TA



Brian Burke
(614) 833-0979 | 430 Longview St Pickerington, OH 43147

and say hello to

Patti Burke
(614) 833-0979 | 430 Longview St Pickerington, OH 43147

I am sure she's very proud of you

VE Testing Rules
 

On Mar 11, 8:14 pm, "Dean M" wrote:
wrote in message

I think some complaints to your ISP for TOS violations are in order. Yes,
that's the ticket
Posting on a newsgroup using other than your real e-mail address...guess
you're screwed there Bluster Man

And who's going to report me?

Have you been stupid all your life or did you Momma drop you on your
head as an adult?

Thanks for the comedy. It was a nice way to end the weekend. Great
weather, took the kids fishing and played a little basketball.

We gotta do this again more often. Thanks for being such a good
sport.

VE Testing Rules
 

wrote in message
...
On 11 Mar 2007 18:10:15 -0700, wrote:

On Mar 11, 8:14 pm, "Dean M" wrote:
wrote in message

I think some complaints to your ISP for TOS violations are in order.
Yes,
that's the ticket
Posting on a newsgroup using other than your real e-mail address...guess
you're screwed there Bluster Man

And who's going to report me?

I will and did. It's amazing what you can come up with.


and for what?

Whos' asking dipschitt

go back to picking your nose



Have you been stupid all your life or did you Momma drop you on your
head as an adult?

WOW what a put down. I dunno Bry. Was that your momma sucking dick for a
dollar over at the TKE house last week. I heard she could suck the chrome
off a trailer hitch

The best part of you Bry ran down your mamma ass and made a brown stain on
the bedspread

Does your wife know you play with potential HIV carriers

whanna keep playing BRY you son of DOS (yes I know what it means)

I understand you were unit punk when you were in the military, got lost of
experience mixing desel fuel with the laterine ****

whanna keep playiing?? We can start on your wife and kids..after all you
openined this door




now now there is better explanation that does get so personal
raditation damage by OOK narrow band RF

Marcus, go back to chasing DX




Thanks for the comedy. It was a nice way to end the weekend. Great
weather, took the kids fishing and played a little basketball.

catch anything?

probably a STD



We gotta do this again more often.

liek turn of the cnetiry:)

Thanks for being such a good
sport.

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

goitta run. Off to the North for some skiing while the wx allows

talk about me behijnd my back 2 losers Bry and Mark..perfect together

Maybe they can hook up at the AES hamfest

Bry can be the giant prick and Marcus can bring the full body rubbers

Ta dipschitts

VE Testing Rules
 

On Mar 11, 10:15 pm, wrote:
On 11 Mar 2007 18:10:15 -0700, wrote:

On Mar 11, 8:14 pm, "Dean M" wrote:
wrote in message

I think some complaints to your ISP for TOS violations are in order. Yes,
that's the ticket
Posting on a newsgroup using other than your real e-mail address...guess
you're screwed there Bluster Man

And who's going to report me?

and for what?

Posting with my hot-ham identity.

Have you been stupid all your life or did you Momma drop you on your
head as an adult?

now now there is better explanation that does get so personal
raditation damage by OOK narrow band RF

I don't think Robesin actually uses OOK.

Thanks for the comedy. It was a nice way to end the weekend. Great
weather, took the kids fishing and played a little basketball.

catch anything?

Nope. We had to cast between the broken ice.

We gotta do this again more often.

liek turn of the cnetiry:)

Thanks for being such a good
sport.

VE Testing Rules
 

On Mar 11, 10:30 pm, "Dean M" wrote:
wrote in message

...

On 11 Mar 2007 18:10:15 -0700, wrote:

On Mar 11, 8:14 pm, "Dean M" wrote:
wrote in message

I think some complaints to your ISP for TOS violations are in order.
Yes,
that's the ticket
Posting on a newsgroup using other than your real e-mail address...guess
you're screwed there Bluster Man

And who's going to report me?

I will and did. It's amazing what you can come up with.

Oh,no. Oh, no. When will the AG knock on my door? I'm skeered.

and for what?

Whos' asking dipschitt

go back to picking your nose

Poor thing is getting all touchy about being made fun of.

Have you been stupid all your life or did you Momma drop you on your
head as an adult?

WOW what a put down. I dunno Bry. Was that your momma sucking dick for a
dollar over at the TKE house last week. I heard she could suck the chrome
off a trailer hitch

You got all my hot-buttons with that one. Now I'm so mad that I could
make a typo.

The best part of you Bry ran down your mamma ass and made a brown stain on
the bedspread

Does your wife know you play with potential HIV carriers

Do you know that everyone is a potential HIV carrier? Especially
emergency room nurses.

whanna keep playing BRY you son of DOS (yes I know what it means)

You do? I didn't think you knew who your daddy was.

I understand you were unit punk when you were in the military, got lost of
experience mixing desel fuel with the laterine ****

My lost of military experience is lost on no-servers such as yourself.

whanna keep playiing?? We can start on your wife and kids..after all you
openined this door

Poor demented thing. Now he's gots to terrorize the wimmin and the
kiddies. Next thing you know, he'll be slashing tires and throwing
bricks through windows.

now now there is better explanation that does get so personal
raditation damage by OOK narrow band RF

Marcus, go back to chasing DX

That's Heil's job.

Thanks for the comedy. It was a nice way to end the weekend. Great
weather, took the kids fishing and played a little basketball.

catch anything?

probably a STD

Poor demented thing. Thinks he can give folks STD's over the web.

We gotta do this again more often.

liek turn of the cnetiry:)

Thanks for being such a good
sport.

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

goitta run.

Try waddling, you'll get farther.

Off to the North for some skiing while the wx allows

Right. More like a sleigh ride hauled by two draft horses.

talk about me behijnd my back

I'll wait for you get back. You give me so much material to work with
it just wouldn't be the same without you.

2 losers Bry and Mark..perfect together

But I like wimmin.

Maybe they can hook up at the AES hamfest

Never been to AES, but have done a fair amount of mail order with them
in years gone by.

Bry can be the giant prick and Marcus can bring the full body rubbers

Doesn't sound like a fun time to me, but if that's what you need to
fantasize about when you're with your soul-mate...

Ta dipschitts

Sayonara, Mr. self-described Riff-Ralph.