LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
Old January 5th 05, 07:16 AM
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote:
Lenof21 wrote:
In article , "JAMES HAMPTON"
writes:

I've had some interesting conversations off group with a number of

folks
that get involved with flames. For the most part, they simply

deal
back
what they were dealt. I think it might be better if we found

common
ground,
rather than point out differences.


Heh heh...the "common ground" is usually just capitulation to

those
which could use the Latin phrase "Primus Inter Pares" as their

motto.
["First Among Equals"] :-)


Do you see other posters here as equals, Len?

As to license numbers, the regular poster of those


Do you mean me, Len?

You seem to be unable to refer to me by first name or callsign. Why

is
that?


To call you by your given name would be to treat you with dignity
and respect, and we all know Lennie is incapable of that.

To address you by your callsign would be to acknowledge that you
have something he doesn't have...And again, Lennie can't do that.

uses massaged data


What do you mean by "massaged data", Len?

The plain, simple fact is that there is a brief, clear explanation of
the numbers I post - each time they are posted. They are the number

of
*current* FCC amateur licenses held by *individuals*.

Which means that club, military, RACES and other station-only

licenses
are not included. Also, licenses which are expired but in the grace
period are not included.

Only currently-licensed individual amateurs are listed in the totals

I
post.


Simple. Plain English is not to Lennie's liking. For it is by
creative wordsmitihing and deception that he can hide his own failures
and inadequacies. And he has plenty of both.

The rationalizations for using "massaged" data have been and no
doubt will continue to be great. :-)


I don't use "massaged" data. What you see is exactly what the posts

say
it is: the total number of current FCC amateur licenses held by
individuals.

Why do you have a problem with that, Len?

As I said....

73

Steve, K4YZ

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access Lloyd Mitchell Antenna 43 October 26th 04 01:37 AM
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 private General 0 May 10th 04 09:39 PM
First BPL License Awarded - Biz WDØHCO Boatanchors 2 October 1st 03 08:51 PM
First BPL License Awarded - Biz WDØHCO Boatanchors 0 October 1st 03 08:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017