Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
X-A-Notice: References line has been trimmed due to 512 byte limitationAbuse-Reports-To: abuse at airmail.net to report improper postings
NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library2.airnews.net NNTP-Posting-Time: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 10:22:27 -0500 (CDT) NNTP-Posting-Host: !^Th1k-Y,5+DF(0N'$e (Encoded at Airnews!) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 wrote in message ... I believe in keeping the CW requirement, and even adding a few more requirements, precisely to enhance the loyalty of licensees and to discourage those who wouldn't be active anyway, or would engage in bad practice. But I don't beg the original question; I've pointed out that a swimming requirement would do almost as well. Len, not to be argumentative, but there are numbers of hams who got their license even under more stringent testing requirements than the past few years, who are inactive and, of those still active, have terrible, terrible operating practices. CW doesn't prove loyalty, staying active, or provide for positive operating practices. It simply means one has passed a CW test, don't you think? Kim W5TIT IOW, I believe in weeding out those whose interest in ARS is sufficiently limited that he refuses to take and pass the swimming test--but I wouldn't say, "If you aren't interested in swimming a mile, you aren't interested in ARS." Likewise with CW. Regards, Len. Again, I don't believe in "weeding out" anyone who can and wants to pass the requirements to get a ham license. And passing CW doesn't weed out anything, heck, listen to any of the HF frequencies that we all have heard with the creeps and nitwits on. The only "area" in which the frequencies may prove out your belief is, literally, on the CW bands, where--simply because of the mode of operation--bad operating practices aren't easily facilitated. I know many hams who claim to be "pure of heart" for the sake of their fellow CW-only friends who, the minute they get on 2M or in an eyeball meeting, rival any bad practices I've heard and have the language of the rest of us when we are speaking verbally! GRIN CW alone doesn't equal good operating, etc. The mode just simply doesn't facilitate anything but a jargon based language that is difficult to spend time swearing, cursing, etc. Kim W5TIT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|