In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:

I have never used "Avery Fine" as a screen name.

Yes, you have. Here's just one example - there are more.

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...000514%40nso-c
v.aol.com&output=gplain

BEGIN QUOTE:

From: (Avery Fine)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
Subject: PSK31 Sked
Lines: 65
NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder07.news.aol.com
X-Admin:
Date: 16 Sep 2000 23:17:20 GMT
References:
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
X-Newsreader: Session Scheduler
Message-ID:


In article , Sig Heil writes:

You remain a bitter and ancient child.

Now, now, you are looking into the mirror again when you write. :-)

It is now quite obvious that you
have no intention of ever obtaining an amateur radio license exam.

That is YOUR suppository, er, supposition, Herr Standartenfuhrer.

Why do you continue to post these lengthy diatribes having nothing to do
with amateur radio?

On the contrary, YOUR lengthy diatribes address nothing but an
attempt to suppress dissent and to "get even" with being taken
to task two years ago on your braggadoccio of radio expertise.
You've never forgotten and want vindication. You get none. This
makes you whiney and petulant. Poor baby.

The restructuring in amateur radio is not yet complete. More
needs to be done to bring US amateur radio regulations closer
to 1980s standards (it had been at 1950s standards, more or
less). You and a few others who achieved their "qualifications"
(!) from high-rate code and 1-by-2 or 2-by-1 callsigns cannot take
the new rules and insist that all be "qualified" under the old ones
or you will not "recognize them."

Those who do not accept YOUR definition are objects of your
highly-negative, follow-the-law-as-it-is-NOW criticsm.

Just the same, in other threads on other subjects, Herr Heil
hasn't spoken out on any technical subjects that can affect
policy of now or even later...except to go on at length on a
non-relationship of surname Heil in regards to microphones.

[ for shame! 'real' hams don't bark into microphones! :-) ]

Have you nothing else in your life?

Considerably more, four-neuroned-brain Heil. The attitudes of
national socialist partei one-by-twos who think they are
wielding two-by-fours of arrogant superiority make the
prospect of "proper" and "right" licensing unattractive to be
placed at the top of any agenda. YOU are in such a category
by public observation of anyone accessing this newsgroup.

Perhaps your many years of public service at the State
Department have made you oblivious to the fact that the
FCC (that's another government agency that regulates
civil radio in the USA) sets licensing standards for US
radio amateurs. It also grants licenses. It granted yours
(apparently). The US amateur radio community does not
grant licenses...nor does it "rule" on the "motivations" it
thinks citizens have in regards to radio licenses. You
seem to think that you "know" everything about those
who post contrary opinions to yours. Have fun in your
self-important ignorance, go ahead and post more of
your "hate" allegations as if you represent the entire
US ARS community. I don't care to message with
you further (as if I ever did to your libelous postings),
Herr Standartenfuhrer. I'm going to a college reunion.
QRT.

didit


END QUOTE