Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Leo" wrote in message ... Paul, Fully agreed - I found the survey quite by accident when I was looking up sonething on the RAC web site in August, otherwise I would not have missed it too.. Was it advertised in the magazine? If so, I don'rt recall seeing it! Hopefully, the ARRL won't try to pull the same stunt....whatever way the vote goes, it should fairly represent the wishes of the Amateur community, not a small (and perhaps biased??) sampling. 73, Leo Given that: 1) the ARRL's membership represents 25% of US licensees and 2) that the membership is HEAVILY stacked with long-time hams (Techs have stayed away in droves - in my view because they correctly have viewd ARRL's Morse policy as designed to keep them off of HF) I would, even giving the ARRL credit for the best of intentions, submit that any survey of ARRL membership is unlikely to be TRULY representative of the views of the majority of US hams. Carl - w3kc |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|