Also, I will be lobbying FCC OET and the Commissioners in the
coming weeks against BPL ... and I've been out in the Emmaus, PA
BPL "pilot" area with local reporters SHOWING them just how bad
BPL really is (after showing them what S0-S9 signals sound like on
a quiet band away from the BPL area so that when they see/hear the
"wall to wall" S9+ "hash" from BPL they understand just how bad
it really is.

So don't give me this "sock-puppet for the broadband cartel" crap.

Carl - wk3c


Well there it is folks, Karl the Nut is going to save Ham Radio. Just think
Karl is going to put these Billion dollar companies in there place. Lets all
bow to Karl the Nut for saving Ham Radio.

WA8ULX wrote in message
Karl is going to put these Billion dollar companies in there place. Lets
all
bow to Karl the Nut for saving Ham Radio.

You mean "in their" as in "in their place" instead of "there" as in put it
over "there". Nothing like a third grade education.

You mean "in their" as in "in their place" instead of "there" as in put it
over "there". Nothing like a third grade education.


Its sure good to know your good for something other than Ham Radio.

In article ,
(WA8ULX) writes:

Also, I will be lobbying FCC OET and the Commissioners in the
coming weeks against BPL ... and I've been out in the Emmaus, PA
BPL "pilot" area with local reporters SHOWING them just how bad
BPL really is (after showing them what S0-S9 signals sound like on
a quiet band away from the BPL area so that when they see/hear the
"wall to wall" S9+ "hash" from BPL they understand just how bad
it really is.

So don't give me this "sock-puppet for the broadband cartel" crap.

Carl - wk3c


Well there it is folks, Karl the Nut is going to save Ham Radio.

Did you read his comments to the FCC? I did. Lots of good, sound, rational
stuff against BPL. Including actual firsthand accounts of the noise.

Hardly the work of a "nut", I'd say.

Just think
Karl is going to put these Billion dollar companies in there place.

Not by himself. But his stuff will surely help.

I filed comments against BPL, Carl filed comments, ARRL filed comments, lots of
folks filed comments - did you file comments, Bruce?

did you file comments, Bruce?


No I dont care

On 28 Sep 2003 14:06:57 GMT, (WA8ULX) wrote:

did you file comments, Bruce?


No I dont care

Why does that not surprise me one bit?


73 DE John, KC2HMZ
Tonawanda, New York

Why does that not surprise me one bit?


73 DE John, KC2HMZ
Tonawanda, New York

Because I think BPL is a good thing.

"N2EY" wrote in message
...
In article ,
(WA8ULX) writes:

Also, I will be lobbying FCC OET and the Commissioners in the
coming weeks against BPL ... and I've been out in the Emmaus, PA
BPL "pilot" area with local reporters SHOWING them just how bad
BPL really is (after showing them what S0-S9 signals sound like on
a quiet band away from the BPL area so that when they see/hear the
"wall to wall" S9+ "hash" from BPL they understand just how bad
it really is.

So don't give me this "sock-puppet for the broadband cartel" crap.

Carl - wk3c


Well there it is folks, Karl the Nut is going to save Ham Radio.

Did you read his comments to the FCC? I did. Lots of good, sound, rational
stuff against BPL. Including actual firsthand accounts of the noise.

Hardly the work of a "nut", I'd say.

Thanks Jim ... while we continue to disagree on the code/nocode
issue, your sense of fairness in this unrelated matter is appreciated.

Just think
Karl is going to put these Billion dollar companies in there place.

Not by himself. But his stuff will surely help.

I filed comments against BPL, Carl filed comments, ARRL filed comments,
lots of
folks filed comments - did you file comments, Bruce?

I can hardly wait to hear Bruce's excuse ... on the other hand, the way
he comes across, we'd be better off if the FCC never, ever, heard from
him.

Carl - wk3c

I can hardly wait to hear Bruce's excuse ... on the other hand, the way
he comes across, we'd be better off if the FCC never, ever, heard from
him.

Carl - wk3c


We you say we, I hope you are referring to your CBplusser Buddies, because you
sure dont speak for REAL HAMS.

In article ,
(WA8ULX) writes:

I can hardly wait to hear Bruce's excuse ... on the other hand, the way
he comes across, we'd be better off if the FCC never, ever, heard from
him.

Carl - wk3c


We you say we, I hope you are referring to your CBplusser Buddies, because
you
sure dont speak for REAL HAMS.

On the issue of BPL, Carl sure does speak for me. I agree with everyhting he
wrote in his comments on BPL. Does that mean I'm not a "real ham", Bruce?