Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... N2EY wrote: In article , "Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net writes: When they drop the morse code test requirement, it's fairly clear to me they just won't "drop" it all by itself with a stroke of an administrative pen; Why not? That's all that most of the anticodetest petitions are asking for. Both the NCI and NCVEC petitions simply ask for the dropping of Element 1 and nothing else. I don't think it can work by "just" dropping the test. Too many loos ends. Tech plus, novices, that kind of thing. - Mike KB3EIA - Actually it would work quite easily. Everyone keeps their current privileges except that all varieties of Techs are combined to one class of Tech with the privileges of the Tech with HF. However, as you know I think they ought to keep the code test. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Change of frequency of EM signal | Antenna | |||
SWR will change with Source Z if you measure AT the Source | Antenna |