Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Kim W5TIT" wrote:
Dwight, I don't know how it is where you are, but here there is no one willing to do the work a lot of our immigrant population are willing to do--and do. Nonsense, Kim. The reason most people aren't willing to do those jobs is because the wages are so low. Offer decent wages and people will gladly do those jobs. There are non-immigrant workers throughout this country busting their butts in construction jobs, laborer jobs, crappy jobs, and dangerious jobs. They do so because the wages are decent. My god, there are even people willing to walk into a nuclear reactor if the pay is good enough. Offer decent wages for almost ANY job and I'm fully convinced there will be plenty of non-immigrant workers willing to do those jobs. I see nothing to even suggest otherwise. I remember many times asking my teen-aged son to go get a job and, when he'd retort with, "there aren't any jobs," I would mention some of the things I knew were avaiable: farm work (building fences, etc.); any fast food chain, stock clerk, etc. He was indignant, at best, when he thought his mother would suggest such a thing to her own son...that was not work he was about to go do. Why should he work? He's living at home with mommy where everything is free and he's spoiled rotten. When he is old enough, throw his butt out and watch how fast his work ethic changes. In the meantime, sharply reduce the money you give him (no car, no fancy school cloths, no expensive shoes, no music CD's, no stereo, and so on) and tell him to get a job if he wants those extras. After he throws a temper tantrum for a few months, wears out of the stuff he has now, and realises you're serious, a job will look much more appealing to him. He will have to do all this eventually anyway, so now is a good time to start properly preparing him for his future. Later, once he has to start paying for them, he'll miss the free food you gave him and the free shelter you provided. Now, I meet adults with the same attitude. I am very thankful for that part of my community with people who are willing to take on the immense task of the "physical labor" jobs that many of us wouldn't be caught doing. Very thankful indeed, for no one else would do them. Like those other adults you mention, there are many jobs I will not do today, Kim. I can't afford to do those low paying jobs if I want to feed my family, live in a decent home, and make the car payments. And I'm certainly not willing to live twenty to a hotel room or apartment like you see so many poor illegal immigrants doing today. And, lets face it, I just can't physically do some of those jobs anymore. But none of that suggests for a moment that I'm not willing to work. Likewise, none of that suggests there are no younger non-immigrants willing to do those jobs if the wages were decent. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
hlink.net... "Kim W5TIT" wrote: Dwight, I don't know how it is where you are, but here there is no one willing to do the work a lot of our immigrant population are willing to do--and do. Nonsense, Kim. The reason most people aren't willing to do those jobs is because the wages are so low. Offer decent wages and people will gladly do those jobs. I don't know about you, but I sure don't want to be paying the price of your philosophy noted above. Oh. And how dare you tell me "nonsense," Dwight. I am relaying to you things from my own experience and you say to me, "NONSENSE?" Do you know how much like Larry Roll you are sounding? There are non-immigrant workers throughout this country busting their butts in construction jobs, laborer jobs, crappy jobs, and dangerious jobs. They do so because the wages are decent. My god, there are even people willing to walk into a nuclear reactor if the pay is good enough. Offer decent wages for almost ANY job and I'm fully convinced there will be plenty of non-immigrant workers willing to do those jobs. I see nothing to even suggest otherwise. And you'd better be ready to not be able to afford almost anything you buy cheaply right now BECAUSE of things as they are. I remember many times asking my teen-aged son to go get a job and, when he'd retort with, "there aren't any jobs," I would mention some of the things I knew were avaiable: farm work (building fences, etc.); any fast food chain, stock clerk, etc. He was indignant, at best, when he thought his mother would suggest such a thing to her own son...that was not work he was about to go do. Why should he work? He's living at home with mommy where everything is free and he's spoiled rotten. Uh, I don't know what home you're talking about, but my kids were not spoiled rotten. They got no car unless they bought it themselves. They did NOT get any monetary support from me for any of their wants or needs in any area except school and clothing. And, they were told they could either spend my $200.00 on one outfit at Gadzooks for the whole schoolyear, or they could go to Wal-Mart and get several pairs of Rustler Jeans and some shirts and shoes. When he is old enough, throw his butt out and watch how fast his work ethic changes. In the meantime, sharply reduce the money you give him (no car, no fancy school cloths, no expensive shoes, no music CD's, no stereo, and so on) and tell him to get a job if he wants those extras. After he throws a temper tantrum for a few months, wears out of the stuff he has now, and realises you're serious, a job will look much more appealing to him. He will have to do all this eventually anyway, so now is a good time to start properly preparing him for his future. Later, once he has to start paying for them, he'll miss the free food you gave him and the free shelter you provided. Like I said. Don't know whose home you've been peering into, but it ain't mine. My sons are long from teen-aged any more. Now, I meet adults with the same attitude. I am very thankful for that part of my community with people who are willing to take on the immense task of the "physical labor" jobs that many of us wouldn't be caught doing. Very thankful indeed, for no one else would do them. Like those other adults you mention, there are many jobs I will not do today, Kim. I can't afford to do those low paying jobs if I want to feed my family, live in a decent home, and make the car payments. And I'm certainly not willing to live twenty to a hotel room or apartment like you see so many poor illegal immigrants doing today. And, lets face it, I just can't physically do some of those jobs anymore. But none of that suggests for a moment that I'm not willing to work. Likewise, none of that suggests there are no younger non-immigrants willing to do those jobs if the wages were decent. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ Didn't say you aren't willing to work. And you're comments above about how tough those jobs are for very little pay and how you wouldn't do them...just highlights exactly what I was saying. Kim W5TIT |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Kim W5TIT" wrote:
I don't know about you, but I sure don't want to be paying the price of your philosophy noted above. Oh. And how dare you tell me "nonsense," Dwight. I am relaying to you things from my own experience and you say to me, "NONSENSE?" The nonsense was directed at your conclusions, Kim. How can you possibly say "no one" is willing to do the work? As I said, the main reason most people aren't willing to (and actually cannot) do those jobs is because of the wages are too low, not because they're not willing to work. People are willing to work if the pay is decent. And you'd better be ready to not be able to afford almost anything you buy cheaply right now BECAUSE of things as they are. I've already given several ways wages can be increased without significantly increasing the costs of consumer goods. Uh, I don't know what home you're talking about, but my kids were not spoiled rotten. (snip) Your kid was used as a metaphor for all kids in general. That should have been obvious since it is clear I don't know your specific kid. Didn't say you aren't willing to work. (snip) Actually, you did pretty much say that, Kim. About me and all other non-immigrant Americans. Your exact words were "no one is willing to do the work a lot of our immigrant population are willing to do." Of course, that simply isn't true (not even close). (snip) And you're comments above about how tough those jobs are for very little pay and how you wouldn't do them...just highlights exactly what I was saying. I said nothing about how tough those jobs are. Those jobs are the venue of younger people without the aches and pains of older age. I did those jobs when I was younger, but have since moved on to more substantial work over the years to the point of owning my own businesses today. However, there are plenty of young people today more than willing to work. But, as I said, they're not going to be thrilled about working in jobs with wages so low they cannot feed their families and have to live twenty to a hotel room or apartment to help keep living costs down (like so many poor illegal immigrants do today). If this overall trend continues, Americans in the not so distant future, perhaps your grandchildren, are going to be living just like people do in third-world countries. That's the real future we're leaving future generations. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article .net, "Dwight
Stewart" writes: "Kim" wrote: I don't know about you, but I sure don't want to be paying the price of your philosophy noted above. Oh. And how dare you tell me "nonsense," Dwight. I am relaying to you things from my own experience and you say to me, "NONSENSE?" The nonsense was directed at your conclusions, Kim. How can you possibly say "no one" is willing to do the work? Dwight, I think that when Kim writes "no one" in a context like that, she really means "almost no one" or "hardly anyone" rather than the literal standard meaning "not a single person" or "nobody at all". Of course there's the economic concept, derived from supply-and-demand, that if you have something nobody seems to want, you have to make it more attractive. With a product, that can me a lower price; with a job, that can mean higher wages/better benefits. Just MHO 73 de Jim, N2EY 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
N2EY wrote:
In article .net, "Dwight Stewart" writes: "Kim" wrote: I don't know about you, but I sure don't want to be paying the price of your philosophy noted above. Oh. And how dare you tell me "nonsense," Dwight. I am relaying to you things from my own experience and you say to me, "NONSENSE?" The nonsense was directed at your conclusions, Kim. How can you possibly say "no one" is willing to do the work? Dwight, I think that when Kim writes "no one" in a context like that, she really means "almost no one" or "hardly anyone" rather than the literal standard meaning "not a single person" or "nobody at all". Of course there's the economic concept, derived from supply-and-demand, that if you have something nobody seems to want, you have to make it more attractive. With a product, that can me a lower price; with a job, that can mean higher wages/better benefits. Sure! Corning Glass which recently closed in my town, had this situation. The "hot" end of the building had work which was hot and fairly dangerous, as working with molten glass is going to be. To entice workers there, they were paid quite well. Simple supply and demand. They are history now, and won't come back, as they can't compete with the foreign sources. The foreign sources are so heavily subsidized by their respective governments that it is just about impossible to compete. I wonder what we'll do when the last manufacturing jobs are gone from the US? Run up a white flag? (made in some other country, of course!) - Mike KB3EIA - |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"N2EY" wrote:
I think that when Kim writes "no one" in a context like that, she really means "almost no one" or "hardly anyone" rather than the literal standard meaning "not a single person" or "nobody at all". I know what she means, but it's not what she wrote, Jim. And if we can't get past the absoluteness of that "no one," there is little way to continue the discussion. If we're instead talking about "almost no one" or "hardly anyone," then the obvious question becomes why bring in immigrants to take even those few people's jobs or drive down their wages. Of course, I don't really expect Kim to answer those questions. Few seem to care about the Americans who are losing their jobs, or are seeing their wages reduced, as a result of immigration and other government policies. They have their pro-immigration blinders on and refuse to see the obvious fallout of these government policies. I look around and see many in my hometown (a small town) unemployed or working in low paying jobs while every factory in the area closes and immigrants move in to take jobs. A friend, who has been doing lawn care for almost three decades, recently lost a long-standing contract to another out-of-state company using all immigrant employees. As a result, he filed for bankruptcy and had to fire his entire workforce - Americans who were willing to work. I'm feeling the pressure right now. One of my companies (wetland maintenance) is facing competition from a company with almost all illegal immigrant employees. I just barely held onto a county contract last time, but profits are now dismal. To hold onto that contract next time, either I cut my employee's wages sharply or I replace them with illegal immigrants. The only other option is to not even bid at all, which means the other company (with it's illegal immigrants) is assured the contract (and I let employees go). The economy of this country is quickly heading to hell in a handbasket and few seem to even notice or care. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
ink.net... "N2EY" wrote: I think that when Kim writes "no one" in a context like that, she really means "almost no one" or "hardly anyone" rather than the literal standard meaning "not a single person" or "nobody at all". I know what she means, but it's not what she wrote, Jim. And if we can't get past the absoluteness of that "no one," there is little way to continue the discussion. If we're instead talking about "almost no one" or "hardly anyone," then the obvious question becomes why bring in immigrants to take even those few people's jobs or drive down their wages. And, if you want to argue symantecs, Dwight, then you have a roadblock that won't allow for reasonable discussion of the topic. I am telling you that my experience has been that people who are customarily born in this country feel that the jobs we are speaking of are beneath them. Period. Now, the only areas of this country that I have lived in with enough time to gather that opinion is in NE NY and down here in the DFW area. If your experience is different--sobeit. But, how dare you dismiss the experiences I have seen. Not only am I basing the opinion I have off true experience and observations, I am also an above-average (or was) politically active person. When topics like this come up on radio talk-shows, television news magazine shows, and in Congress--which I used to spend hours and hours every day watching--the discussion is that "immigration" is killing jobs in this country vs. that the jobs in this country immigration fills are those that will not customarily be done by people born here. I wish I could say to you, "prove to me that there are people born here who will ______" and you fill in the blank. But that is both unrealistic and not constructive. So, the only mechanism I have by which to comment on the topic *is* from my experience. I even added enough honesty into the discussion to say that, neither now or when I *was* young enough to do it, would *I* do those jobs. And, as Jim/N2EY pointed out, *immigrant* farming is a whole other ballgame than just farming. Immigrant farming involves migrant lifestyles that few of us are even familiar with--let alone willing to do. Of course, I don't really expect Kim to answer those questions. Few seem to care about the Americans who are losing their jobs, or are seeing their wages reduced, as a result of immigration and other government policies. They have their pro-immigration blinders on and refuse to see the obvious fallout of these government policies. And, how dare you again, Dwight. You are being as overhanded with your remarks about my character, related to this conversation as anyone like Larry Roll would be--so don't even bother calling him on the carpet for his behavior!! How dare you imply that I "don't care" about bad policies in this country. Have I once said I don't care? Furthermore, the obvious fallout that you believe is not what I see--and I've just told you I am basing that on experience. Go to the Unemployment lines. I haven't--but I *BET* the majority of people in those lines are not looking for work on farms, at Wal-Mart, with municipalities, landscape companies, construction firms, asbestos abatement firms, chemical and biological hazard waste firms, and our ever-famous convenience stores such as 7-Eleven--all of which need people constantly. I reiterate *CONSTANTLY* because there is no one who will "take" those jobs--*EXCEPT* people who recognize them as a job to take when one is desperate. (An aside--if you want to break off into symantecs and argue about defining "no one," go debate with yourself, Dwight). Those jobs, and so many more that I could think of, are *generally* not taken by people who have been born in this country. There are some who do--and they are in what used to be the ethnic miniorities. All one need do is look around them to see where our youth find important and meaningful employment: McDonald's and other fast food joints, light dining restaraunts, and that's about it. Why did I break-out to light dining restaraunts? Because I don't see teen-agers in the "finer" dining restaraunts--and my husband and I love to eat out so we have some experience. Know why *I* think they (teen-agers) aren't there? Because there, the customer service is higher scale, which demands more personality, better etiquette, and of course--greater work ethic. Guess who we do see serving us in those restaraunts? My husband has been at his formerly family-owned business for 27 years. His mom sold the company last year. For most of those 27 years, until about 10 years ago, they had a great crew of folks. Since then, the main focus of my husband's every day work has been to get someone in there who wants a job and will work. Know how many nieces nephews, and his own kids and my son, he has had through those years? Ten. Not one of them has ever, ever worked there. Know how many great nieces and nephews he has had who, of course, have been old enough to work through those years? They are just now getting in to their early-mid teens. A quick count of those that could work there is somewhere around seven. Not one has ever done it. Oh, I take that back. My husband's daugher worked there--for literally four days. For goodness sake, here's a great example: I am privvy to a situation where I know a kid of coworker's who had "no prospect" (yeah, right) of a job after completing a 2-year program with one of these "tech" type training institutions. So, she's back living with mummy and daddy and pining and sighing every day. I have a co-worker who is from India. He's brought his wife over here and she'd been here for about, oh, three months before they both learned of the medical transcritption service industry that's been popping up over the past few years. He has a problem with his wife going out in the workforce, but she wanted to work to contribute to the recovery of costs it took to get her here, etc. She went to a 6-week (I think it was) school to learn medical transcription, blah, blah, blah, she now has her own home-business with her family doctor as her first customer and she'll get more, I'm sure. We were all talking about this at work. He mentions this to this coworker whose kid has no prospect for a job. Know what the kid's response was? I think you do. So, it isn't only you who has your own company, Dwight, whose livelihood is at stake with things such as they are. I'll come full circle with my indignation again: how dare you imply that I don't care. I look around and see many in my hometown (a small town) unemployed or working in low paying jobs while every factory in the area closes and immigrants move in to take jobs. If the factories are closing, then what jobs are the immigrants moving in to take? And, have you any friends or casual acquaintances that you can ask if they have tried to get those jobs? I am still curious to know if factories are closing, what jobs are available for anyone to take? I take your comment above to be pretty dismal. I've been in dismal (the NE when the oil crisis happened--talk about getting dismal) and I had to move down here to make it. A friend, who has been doing lawn care for almost three decades, recently lost a long-standing contract to another out-of-state company using all immigrant employees. As a result, he filed for bankruptcy and had to fire his entire workforce - Americans who were willing to work. Well, excuse me for the honesty--you'll call it having my blinders on or not caring, maybe even because I am a "liberal"--but, if one contract put this company out of business, then perhaps the person should have gone on to some form of vocational or higher level training in business practices before they took such a jump. I've had my own company too, years ago. And, if I'd had just one "large" job/contract, I would have been in a constant state of panic. And, as an aside, if this person's seeing other companies get the contracts...then go get a job with those companies as a Salesperson, or whatever. Maybe he/she *won't* make the money he's accustomed to--but we gotta do whatever it takes to make adjustments to the things we have no control over. And, if we have no control over the employment situation in this country--we don't whine about it. We knuckle under, get the menial jobs, sell the big house, get the little house, sell the SUV and get the Saturn, and we begin the task of seeing what we can do--if anything--to change the route of what we perceive as being awful. I'm feeling the pressure right now. One of my companies (wetland maintenance) is facing competition from a company with almost all illegal immigrant employees. Then, report the company to INS. REPORT THEM. If the company is getting contracts based on their employment of illegeal aliens, then I am sure the firms they are doing services for will want to know this. For goodness sake, REPORT their ass. I just barely held onto a county contract last time, but profits are now dismal. To hold onto that contract next time, either I cut my employee's wages sharply or I replace them with illegal immigrants. Don't you dare buy in to the illegal and unethical side of this. To join is not to change or conquer. The only other option is to not even bid at all, which means the other company (with it's illegal immigrants) is assured the contract (and I let employees go). And, if it illegal immigration that is nulling you out, you use the laws and shouting as loud as you can shout to fight it. The economy of this country is quickly heading to hell in a handbasket and few seem to even notice or care. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ I don't know who's not noticing or caring. I see a lot of doing nothing to get involved against it, or to even lift a finger of their own to change it. Kim W5TIT |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew | |||
FS Large LOT Of NEW Tubes | Boatanchors | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew |