Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"N2EY" wrote in message ... btw, we *don't* test all hams for Morse skill now. Rephrased then... we DO test all hams that have or want a license to operate HF for morse skill... but hey, maybe we should reinstitute waivers again since the treaty is no longer mandating the 5 wpm which the FCC never waivered before. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article et, "Bill Sohl"
writes: "N2EY" wrote in message ... btw, we *don't* test all hams for Morse skill now. Rephrased then... we DO test all hams that have or want a license to operate HF for morse skill... but hey, maybe we should reinstitute waivers again since the treaty is no longer mandating the 5 wpm which the FCC never waivered before. Perhaps! But by the same token, why not waivers for some of the written tests? Since it doesn't require any more technical knowledge to operate on, say, 3.755 than it does on 3.995.... 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"N2EY" wrote in message ... In article et, "Bill Sohl" writes: "N2EY" wrote in message ... btw, we *don't* test all hams for Morse skill now. Rephrased then... we DO test all hams that have or want a license to operate HF for morse skill... but hey, maybe we should reinstitute waivers again since the treaty is no longer mandating the 5 wpm which the FCC never waivered before. Perhaps! But by the same token, why not waivers for some of the written tests? Since it doesn't require any more technical knowledge to operate on, say, 3.755 than it does on 3.995.... If that's something you want to do, feel free to file the petition. Cheers :-) :-) Bill K2UNK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
ARRL FUD about BPL | General |